Universe Has No Other Relatioship

Author: ebuc

Posts

Total: 20
Topic's author
#1
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,263
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Universe { @ } has not relationship to other-ness i.e. finite Universe is isolated within itself only aka no lines-of-relationship to other-ness.
Universe is alone in macro-infinite, truly non-occupied space.

.....Space..........................................................................Space......
.....Space................................@.......................................Space.....
.....Space...........................................................................Space.....

There exists no logical, common sense critical thinking alternative to this scenario.

Only integrity counts. 

Integrity..' 2. the state of being whole and undivided. '....

Aka as connected-ness ergo the one-ness the whole-ness.

2D { area } wholeness begins with a triangular enclosure of space  /\

3D { volume } wholeness begins with tetrahedral enclosure of space.

marcusbanks5x5....." Quantum entanglement and quantum physics provide a scientific explanation of spirituality by revealing the interconnectedness and wholeness inherent in the universe. This is demonstrated through the concept of entanglement, which highlights how particles can be instantaneously connected regardless of distance, suggesting a deeper level of unity beyond physical boundaries.

....Quantum mechanics challenges reductionist views by emphasizing holistic systems and undivided wholeness, aligning with spiritual notions of interconnectedness and oneness within the universe.

...Therefore, quantum entanglement offers a scientific basis for understanding spiritual concepts of unity and interconnectedness. "...

Topic's author
#2
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,263
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
MIT trained engineer and 6th man to walk on the moon. Time Stamp .34 she { Noetic Sciences } begins the story of Edgars trip back to Earth that caused his inter-connected-ness as a one-ness with all existence.

We are our microbes 9:00 ..the old we are what we eat etc...

10:40 our DNA genetics respond to our experiences

Socially mediated  inter-connected-ness 11:36

#3
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,212
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@ebuc
Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen pointed out an apparent problem with quantum entanglement in 1935 that prompted Einstein to describe quantum entanglement as 'spooky action at a distance. 
#4
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@FLRW
Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen pointed out an apparent problem with quantum entanglement in 1935 that prompted Einstein to describe quantum entanglement as 'spooky action at a distance.

What was Einstein's problem with quantum mechanics?
Einstein saw Quantum Theory as a means to describe Nature on an atomic level, but he doubted that it upheld "a useful basis for the whole of physics." He thought that describing reality required firm predictions followed by direct observations.

Topic's author
#5
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,263
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen pointed out an apparent problem with quantum entanglement in 1935 that prompted Einstein to describe quantum entanglement as 'spooky action at a distance.

Ive posted in some few months two good videos on that after Googles announcment they had perforemed quantum entanglement. The did a simulation only with their quantum computer.



These two may not be the ones I posted, just grabbed these on quick search as I didnt have any bookmarks of such. Darn!
#6
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@FLRW
Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen pointed out an apparent problem with quantum entanglement in 1935 that prompted Einstein to describe quantum entanglement as 'spooky action at a distance.

The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox is a thought experiment proposed by physicists Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, which argues that the description of physical reality provided by quantum mechanics is incomplete.
#7
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,212
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
I asked AI, Quantum entanglement does not explain spirituality does it?
The response was:
This statement is correct; while quantum entanglement might seem to suggest a deep interconnectedness at the subatomic level, it does not provide any scientific basis for explaining spiritual concepts or experiences, as spirituality often deals with subjective and metaphysical ideas that are currently beyond the scope of physics. 


#8
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@FLRW
I asked AI, Quantum entanglement does not explain spirituality does it?
The response was:
This statement is correct; while quantum entanglement might seem to suggest a deep interconnectedness at the subatomic level, it does not provide any scientific basis for explaining spiritual concepts or experiences, as spirituality often deals with subjective and metaphysical ideas that are currently beyond the scope of physics. 
If spirituality is beyond the scope of science. You should have asked , Is it beyond the scope of A.I.?
#9
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 406
Posts: 2,191
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@ebuc
Are you artificial intelligence?
#10
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Mall
Are you artificial intelligence?
Good trick question.
Topic's author
#11
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,263
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@Shila
Shila, please take a hike from any thread ive started. Please back off with your polluting of DArt atmosphere.
#12
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Mall
Are you artificial intelligence?
No, it is just natural intelligence.
#13
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 406
Posts: 2,191
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Shila
Just asking based off how this individual formats and uses language.
#14
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Mall
Just asking based off how this individual formats and uses language.
To call his responses AI is a compliment.
#15
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,212
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

You all know that ebuc is a Borg, don't you?
#16
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@FLRW
You all know that ebuc is a Borg, don't you?
I wish his math would improve.
Topic's author
#17
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,263
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@FLRW
You all know that ebuc is a Borg, don't you?

Eborg is correct terminology and FL, please F, dont encourage Shila to continue with his polluting of threads ive started.
#18
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@FLRW
You all know that ebuc is a Borg, don't you?
I wish his math would improve and that he can tell the gender  of Shila correctly.
#19
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,212
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@ebuc

OMG, you think Shila is really Gp don't you.
#20
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,253
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@FLRW
OMG, you think Shila is really Gp don't you.
Another bad guess.