NJ drones are Iranian

Author: WyIted
Iran
mothership
drones
new jersey

Posts

Total: 21
Topic's author
#1
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,900
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9


It could be a false flag but it seems that a few congressman have hinted at it and  Heff Van Drew has risked going to prison for disclosing classified information for informing the public that an Iranian mothership was off the coast of the Unired States. 

It looks like Iran has declared war on the United States or that somebody wants us to think they have so I would expect a war with Iran shortly after Trump takes office, which means it's likely in the best interest of the United States to keep Russia tied up in the Ukraine so expect increased action there as well. 
#2
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,075
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Yay! More wars!
#3
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,805
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@WyIted

They just want to see where to deliver their nukes.
#4
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,841
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
If they nuke New Jersey, it will be an improvement.
Topic's author
#5
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,900
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Sidewalker
If they nuke New Jersey, it will be an improvement.
I don't disagree but we also want let them think they can just roll up with drones. I get the feeling that mouths are sealed because they don't want to militarily intervene if it is somebody like China but sending Arial vehicles to surveillance our nuclear sites should be a red line. 
#6
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,146
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@WyIted
It looks like Iran has declared war on the United States or that somebody wants us to think they have so I would expect a war with Iran shortly after Trump takes office, which means it's likely in the best interest of the United States to keep Russia tied up in the Ukraine so expect increased action there as well.
Have you read the link you attached?

Pentagon refuted Van Drew's drone claim

During a press conference Wednesday afternoon, Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Sabrina Singh stated that there is not any truth to Van Drew's statements, saying, "There is no Iranian ship off of the coast of the United States and there is no so-called mothership launching drones towards the United States."


At this time, according to Singh, there is no evidence that the reported drone activities are coming from a foreign entity or the work of an adversary. She added that, while the Pentagon is continuing to monitor the situation, no installations have been threatened when this activity was occurring.

"These are not U.S. Military drones. This is being investigated by local law enforcement," said Singh. "Our initial assessment here is that these are not drones or activities coming from a foreign entity or adversary.".

Topic's author
#7
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,900
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Shila
Yes I read that the pentagon said that. The woman was also choosing her words wisely. I watched the press conference. When asked about the mothership her response is

"There is no mothership"

It's weasel language. Was there one there or not. Nobody asked "is"

Also asked if it came from the US government. She says

"IT IS not military drones" 


Another answer that tells you nothing because it could be CIA drones or some other organization. So she isnusing weasel language to not admit anything. And to be fair if she reveals classified information she can go to prison so I understand why she would. The point is that you don't want to take her denials too seriously 
#8
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,841
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Shila
Have you read the link you attached?
Of course he hasn't, NOBODY reads the links Wylted attaches.


#9
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,146
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@WyIted
Another answer that tells you nothing because it could be CIA drones or some other organization. So she isnusing weasel language to not admit anything. And to be fair if she reveals classified information she can go to prison so I understand why she would. The point is that you don't want to take her denials too seriously 
The drones were is plain sight.
Topic's author
#10
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,900
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Shila
Yes they were in plain site if that's what you were asking though it  was dark and when there were eyes on them they seemed to go dark. 
Topic's author
#11
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,900
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Shila
Are you insinuating that the technology being in plain sight would declassified them. 

That's notnreally how it works if so. To this day the Snowden leaks are considered classified and if you work in the government and talk about the information in them you can go to prison despite the information being public knowledge
#12
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,146
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@WyIted
Yes they were in plain site if that's what you were asking though it  was dark and when there were eyes on them they seemed to go dark.

"These are not U.S. Military drones. This is being investigated by local law enforcement," said Singh. "Our initial assessment here is that these are not drones or activities coming from a foreign entity or adversary.". See your link.
Topic's author
#13
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,900
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Shila
Okay I already knew all thay. If you are trying to make a point by pointing those things out please state what the point is
#14
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,146
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@WyIted
Okay I already knew all thay. If you are trying to make a point by pointing those things out please state what the point is
"These are not U.S. Military drones. This is being investigated by local law enforcement," said Singh. "Our initial assessment here is that these are not drones or activities coming from a foreign entity or adversary.". See your link.

The point is these are not drones or activities coming from a foreign entity or adversary based on the Military’s initial assessment.
#15
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,841
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@WyIted
The middle earth dwelling, shape shifting Reptiloids have drones you know.
#16
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,841
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
This link explains everything about it.

Topic's author
#17
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,900
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Sidewalker
This link explains everything about it.
This changes everything. Wow. 
#18
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,567
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
That reminds me of the time when Bush claimed that Irak had nuclear bombs. Politicians in the US never change. Lol.

It's really weird what it's going on there. I heard that in the UK is happening the same, maybe Victor can tell us if he heard something about it. It's really interesting to note that these drones only show up in the US and in a country allied to the US which is the UK.

There is a witness that says having observed a drone the size of a bus, I don't know any country that developed a drone that big. I mean, I'm not saying it's impossible to develop a drone with such characteristics, it's utterly possible. So the only possibility left is that the US army owns these drones.

I like the idea of alien drones but according to the contactees the final contact between aliens and humans will be very different. Before the alien mothership comes down to introduce themselves to humans, there will be a lot of big alien crafts from different alien races and different types hovering all over the world so that no one has any doubt about it. That event will be spectacular.

I also heard that the deep state, represented by the US military corporations, developed these drones with the help of aliens. Well, it's true that there are two alien factions, the one that is in charge of the human project in the earth, and the other that is against the project and tries to sabotage the project by all means, but I'm not sure about it because the observed drones are basic and don't have capabilities out of this world.
Topic's author
#19
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,900
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@IlDiavolo
It's really weird what it's going on there. I heard that in the UK is happening the same, maybe Victor can tell us if he heard something about it. It's really interesting to note that these drones only show up in the US and in a country allied to the US which is the UK.
It's mostly Republicans politicians and lawmakers talking about it here. Who is talking about it in the UK? It would only take like 5 well placed Americans to create this sort of psyop to justify increasing military budget on drones and also hinting at Iran to justify potential military action. 

#20
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,190
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@IlDiavolo
Yep, weapons of mass destruction.

And there was Saddam hidden down a hole.

And the English Channel is one of the busiest shipping lanes in the World.

What with Russian warships and Chinese cargo ships going one way, and migrants on day trips from France in rubber dinghy's going the other.

It's a job to keep tabs on them all.

Certainly drone sightings over U.S. Airforce bases in East Anglia recently.

And lots of drone activity over prisons bringing in essential supplies like drugs and mobile phones.

Nothing big though.
#21
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,146
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Sidewalker
This link explains everything about it.

Why did they try to explain the drones if they did not want you to know. Now everyone knows about it.