Right wing talking heads are grifters

Author: WyIted

Posts

Total: 11
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,900
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Before I get into the retarded conservative commentators. I want you to know that I listed to your liberal icons this week quite a bit as well to stay on top of luigi the assassin. I enjoyed destiny and hassan piker dabbing on Ben Shapiro about how his audience disagrees with them. However you don't get a free pass because every single left wing commentator thought Daniel Penny committed murder. I guess they would have been okay with Jordan Neely being unrestrained to commit mass murder like he promised. 

If you switched races we all know that everyone would 100% see that the person who stopped a potential mass killing was a hero even if they fucked up and accidentally applied to much pressure for too long in a choke hold.adrenaline does some crazy stuff.

Seriously, every left wing commentator thinks penny went hunting for black people to murder that day and don't really see how retarded that take is. 

Now whether it is Ben Shapiro or Matt Walsk or any of these freaks, they all have the same corporate approved narrative.

"The left is supporting political violence"

In the comments on their videos you can see the audience correcting them and saying "no we also approve of this act, it isn't just the left" it doesn't matter how often they get corrected. Each and every one is saying it is the left, and it's not just the left. It's maybe 50% the left but even if it was 60% it's still a bipartisan sentiment. 

I fucking opened up Twitter and Riley Gaines was commenting on how sick the left is. These people are either really out of touch or liars,  but probably both. 

We need a third party. This little take over of the republican party just isn't going to last but Bernie Sanders is on to something here and we need to just unite left and right with some class conscious action. We can fight about the details and have an internal party vote between Bernie bros and the paleocon working class folks. We have an internal vote and whether some freer version of healthcare decides to replace the current system or they get their single payer, we just vote like a single unit in congress and senate while the Republicans and democrats struggle to stop the takeover of this 3rd position movement. 

As a matter of fact since we will be uniting Bernie bro socialists and people who take nationalism serious we can call the party national socialists. It doesn't matter what we call it though just a 3rd positioning party to reform the nation on behalf of the working class. We will give you single payer, you give us closed borders etc. Whatever we do it just has to be better than leaving the corporate democrat or corporate Republicans in power.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,900
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
I don't even care anymore. We won't even need healthcare once RFK makes food great again 
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@WyIted
Lobbies will start ww3 before they allow an administration to destroy their monopoly in DC
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,841
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
Lobbies will start ww3 before they allow an administration to destroy their monopoly in DC
Will this be before or after Luigi Mangione crashes the economy from inside a jail cell?
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,841
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@WyIted
I don't even care anymore. We won't even need healthcare once RFK makes food great again 
All you need is a worm in your brain, I'm sure that will make everything better.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Sidewalker
You mean the FBI plant that's supposed to keep people poor and stupid and compliant?

Good luck I guess.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Sidewalker
All you need is a worm in your brain, I'm sure that will make everything better.
Why do you support evil? Did you really think people would somehow magically be happy with the current system that treats them like parasites with a few words and slogans?
Swagnarok
Swagnarok's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 1,266
3
2
6
Swagnarok's avatar
Swagnarok
3
2
6
-->
@WyIted
I'm of the disposition that "grifter" as a term is waaaaaaaay overused in politics. Yeah, somebody makes a living by being political. So do congressmen and presidents. Doesn't mean they're actual conmen.

The main problem with the right is that we lack friendly infrastructure above a certain threshold of competency. For example, if somebody somewhere in the halls of academia does research and finds that X Democratic policy had Y positive effects, the mainstream media will catch wind of it and widely report it so that the general public knows. But if an academic does research and finds something that Republicans could use as evidence for their positions? It's likely to stay buried. For example, I watched a few minutes of the SCOTUS hearing on United States v. Skrmetti, and mentioned was a governmental report from the UK which found that transitioning is the opposite of helpful for many minors who do it. Would I have ever stumbled across this report if I hadn't watched the judiciary's equivalent to C-SPAN? Probably not.

I'd argue this isn't even the mainstream media's fault, since at this point everyone knows they're partisan institutions. They're obviously not going to work to find research that undermines the message they exist solely to spread. Instead, it's right wing media's fault for not serving its constituents in the way that left-wing media does its own. The "intellectuals" of the right spend all of their time moaning about how woke a movie with a green-skinned main character is because she was played by a black woman, or screeching about like that one woman who was murdered several years ago by one of the 20+ million illegal immigrants in this country. There's little to no substance to their content, and this dearth of meaningful friendly information is what's turning the right anti-intellectual. Heck, it puts us at a disadvantage in online debates since it's often much harder for us to find evidence than it is for our opponents, hence the right has turned away from platforms like this and toward optics and meming instead.
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,841
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Greyparrot
All you need is a worm in your brain, I'm sure that will make everything better.
Why do you support evil? Did you really think people would somehow magically be happy with the current system that treats them like parasites with a few words and slogans?
I don't know, call me old fashioned I guess, but when I see a guy come along and tell people that America is evil, Americans are your enemy, and Putin is your friend,  and over half of the people swallow that horseshit, I think the country is going to hell in a handbasket. 

I don't really think we need a fascist dictator to get the price of eggs to go down.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,288
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Sidewalker
 America is evil,
DEI is based on that premise.

Americans are your enemy,
AKA: "Garbage"

and Putin is your friend,
Because making enemies is how you stop wars. Sure.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,900
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Swagnarok
, it's right wing media's fault for not serving its constituents in the way that left-wing media does its own. The "intellectuals" of the right spend all of their time moaning about how woke a movie with a green-skinned main character is because she was played by a black woman, or
It might be best just to not play by their rules. For example I saw a journalistell Trump about economists who disagreed with a position of his. Instead of quoting economists who do, he pointed out that economists were also retarded enough to support NAFTA. 

So if we can just get around their game, perhaps we don't need our institutions to match theirs in terms of cherry picking data