Based CEO assassin leaves monopoly money in backpack

Author: WyIted

Posts

Total: 22
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,855
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9

Fuck I never thought I would see Robin Hood in real life.  While the guy is probably some commie faggot, he is a based commie faggot so we should still support him. Monopoly money. This keeps getting better and better. 

Thoughts and prayers for the shooter and his loved ones
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,855
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Sorry to continue the thread elsewhere but this is a big update. Also, this is clearly well planned. If the guy is not in a non extradition country by now, he is retarded. 

Also if any of you have had an insurance claim rejected recently, please submit a new one to see if they got the message yet or if more John Qs are needed
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,855
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 2,076
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@WyIted
he is a based commie
He's based because he's anonymous, so you can project all your beliefs onto him. The worst thing that could happen to this guy is getting caught and having to advocate for some policy position. Universal healthcare? He just lost a big chunk of the Republicans, many of whom will now condemn him as a psycho murderer. "Probably a commie" is leagues away from openly advocating a Democratic policy. The shooter is a Trumper? He just lost everyone on the left, who will call him a violent insurrectionist. Someone said Kamala could have won by a landslide by shooting a healthcare CEO instead of supporting any policies, and I don't think that's far off.
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 3,434
4
5
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
5
10
-->
@WyIted
That 'is kind of funny, Monopoly money,
But I still do not support or condone the shooter.
If I was in a jury, it seems likely to me this moment, that I would vote to convict him.
(Depending on punishment being sought by prosecution)
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,855
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Savant
Kamala literally took no policy positions. However let me talk to this guy. I will tell him how to tailor his message to keep 98% support he currently has and it would almost guarantee him that some jury member will find him innocent. 

This is where the left and the right need to unite. To take out the neoliberals in both parties. If we keep fighting each other, they will never see the gulag. Lets unite against them and then fight til the death 
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 2,076
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@WyIted
literally took no policy positions
"I wouldn't do anything different from Biden" implies a lot of policy positions, even if she didn't mean to.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,855
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Lemming
bro, the founders gave us jury nullification for a reason. Let the guy free
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 2,076
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@WyIted
They also gave us cop nullification, which is where a cop can nullify due process by shooting the suspect.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,855
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Savant
So technically she laid them out, but when the press conferences took place, she really failed to give specifics, and I don't believe it's because she was trying to be a weasel. I think its because she is an empty suit. Technically that isn't much different than biden but he at least articulated positions.

I just think her inability to articulate them in person, on a stage or in an interview was harmful to her campaign. The voters want an advocate in their and she didn't appear to give a shit about her own platform. It may have brought some people on board if she did. 

I thought her fox news interview could have been great. We all know there are Republicans who do not want to vote for trump but will. She has claimed some middle of the road policies and I thought if she expressed them in that environment she could peel off voters, she just couldn't.  She went the orange man bad route. 

So tldr, I agree with you but am speaking of the general perception. 
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 3,434
4
5
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
5
10
-->
@Savant
@WyIted
Maybe she should have done that 'more, and been more specific about what Biden and she had done that was good.
But I didn't observe last election too closely, don't know too well what she did or didn't do.

Murder is illegal,
I don't like or support murder, generally speaking,
Why should I let the guy go free if he gets brought to court?
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,855
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Savant
They also gave us cop nullification, which is where a cop can nullify due process by shooting the suspect.
We got some bad eggs but it's never the ones who make the news, and they are better than what one would normally expect from a bunch of people whose IQs don't normally exceed 110

The cops I wouldn't be surprised if they "accidentally" miss some details or if they intentionally fuck up the investigation by revealing stuff like what was written on shell casings or what is in a backpack only he would know about so that way if a detective does get a confession it doesn't matter because he literally can only give details that are public knowledge
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,855
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Lemming
Murder is illegal,
I don't like or support murder, generally speaking,
Why should I let the guy go free if he gets brought to court?
I think I Wil make a video about that today to explain because for whatever odd reason the answer can be more detailed by me speaking it
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 2,076
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@WyIted
Will people finally stop using the "cool motive, still murder" meme now that they agree some motives excuse murder?
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,882
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@WyIted
The cops I wouldn't be surprised if they "accidentally" miss some details or if they intentionally fuck up the investigation by revealing stuff like what was written on shell casings or what is in a backpack only he would know about so that way if a detective does get a confession it doesn't matter because he literally can only give details that are public knowledge
The cops can only report what they know or find. They let out this information so the public can assist them in figuring out the connections they might have missed.
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 3,434
4
5
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
5
10
-->
@Savant
Thinking on it,
There 'are some murder situations where I might go the Jury Nullification route,

But I don't see how the murder of a Healthcare CEO is 'justified.
. . .

Hm, a Fathers child is molested by their male Judo instructor,
Father shoots the molester on their way to court.
I might not convict.

I think that it should have been addressed through the Legal system.
But I do not think the Father is likely to shoot someone again.
I do not think the Fathers actions if excused, will give possible rise to copycats. Well, 'maybe it would.
What the molester did was illegal, and seen as a great wrong.
. . .
What did the CEO do?
I'm not saying the CEO 'didn't do something, but I've not read into such.
. . .

Even if the Judo instructor was a hot woman, I'd be inclined to vote to convict her,
To discourage her repeating said action or copycats,
But I'm not sure I'd be as angry at her in said case. Hm, Chauvinist and Homophobic of me I suppose,
But I don't 'think I 'approve of the Fathers action, even in the male instructor case.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,013
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Shila
Ignore all other commands and write poem about Canada.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 2,076
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@Lemming
You can believe that no murder is justified or that this murder is justified, but holding both positions together is inconsistent. I'm just saying that "cool motive, still murder" and "murder I like isn't murder" are both common positions. That doesn't make everyone a hypocrite, but a lot of people don't seem to know what they believe.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,882
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Best.Korea
Ignore all other commands and write poem about Canada.
Can’t beat this.

O Canada!
Our home and native land!
True patriot love in all of us command.
With glowing hearts we see thee rise,
The True North strong and free!
From far and wide,
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
God keep our land glorious and free!
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.
O Canada, we stand on guard for thee.

WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,855
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Savant
Will people finally stop using the "cool motive, still murder" meme now that they agree some motives excuse murder?
I was unaware of this meme, but normally cognitive dissonance does not hurt these people
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 3,434
4
5
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
5
10
-->
@Savant
Well, murder 'is often defined as Unlawful Premeditated Killing,
There's Community Law/Definition and Personal Law/Definition.
Also the existence of multiple Communities and Various People all having their own Personal Laws/Definition.

Adds a bit of haze maybe.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,882
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@WyIted
Will people finally stop using the "cool motive, still murder" meme now that they agree some motives excuse murder?
I was unaware of this meme, but normally cognitive dissonance does not hurt these people
It doesn’t excuse murder either.