The Comitia

Author: Swagnarok

Posts

Total: 5
Swagnarok
Swagnarok's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 1,266
3
2
6
Swagnarok's avatar
Swagnarok
3
2
6
This is a thought experiment about a legislative model that I thought up some time ago. Admittedly I have some deja vu while posting, but it appears I've never created a thread about this topic so whatever.

The foundation of the Comitia is a society where the average voter asks his or her self this question:

"Who do I want representing me in Congress today?"

I italicized the "today", because that really is the crux of it. There is no election day, because it's always election day for someone. There are no districts, just delegates with X or Y number of votes backing them.
Basically, anyone would have a right to sit in the Comitia and vote if, at the start of that business day, 50 backers had their votes delegated to him/her. Some delegates might have 50 backers, while others might have 50,000 or even 50,000,000. There would be no elections with winners and losers, only whales and small fries, constantly bargaining with each other in a bid to form coalitions and swing votes. The number of backers would determine voting power; for example, if a group of delegates backed by a cumulative total of 35,000,000 people voted Yea to Resolution 555, while a group of delegates backed by a cumulative total of 34,999,999 people voted Nay, then the motion would pass, assuming a simple majority sufficed to pass it.
Anyone could re-delegate their vote at any time by visiting either the post office or a permanent voting precinct (or even a mobile app), and voting power in the Comitia would be re-apportioned at the start of the next day to reflect these changes.

The advantages are straightforward. In real life, if a Senator was elected on a moderate conservative Christian platform to a 6-year term and then was videotaped engaging in kinky master-slave roleplay with his black boyfriend, on day 1 of office, then the voters who put him there would have to wait 6 years to remove him. But under a Comitia system, his backers could immediately wash their hands of him and give their votes to somebody else. He wouldn't be removed from the Comitia outright, assuming he had 50 backers who either still supported him or were too lazy to change their vote, but he'd be stripped of his political relevancy and his ex-backers could say they weren't still represented by a guy whose values were at odds with their own.

Put more simply, delegates would have to be very responsive to the wants of their constituents and avoid scandals, because their voting power could tank very quickly if they misstepped. Players and factions could rise and fall, wax and wane, in the span of a week. Having a large number of ordinary citizens with experience as delegates, such as getting together with your relatives and appointing your uncle to the Comitia, could raise popular participation in government at the highest levels of power, and lessen people's sense of alienation and disenfranchisement.

Obviously, this body would need complicated rules regarding committee assignments and allocation of budget for staffers. How that would work is outside the scope of this post, but I'm sure somebody could get it to work.

Anyways, what are your thoughts?
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,801
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Swagnarok

Yes, it's time to rethink the USA.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,884
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
The advantages are straightforward. In real life, if a Senator was elected on a moderate conservative Christian platform to a 6-year term and then was videotaped engaging in kinky master-slave roleplay with his black boyfriend, on day 1 of office, then the voters who put him there would have to wait 6 years to remove him
I don't like the concept of who is representing me. Not sure why I would care. I do know that my ideals are superior to everyone else's and if followed through would lead to a virtual utopia. So I only care if they vote the way I told them to. The exception is Trump because he is playing g 4d chess and I just trust him to be so good at grand strategy it doesn't matterĀ 
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,884
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Another problem with this is the establishment will lie and twist shit into scandals to remove power from antdisestablishmentarians that are more in line with the will of the voters
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 3,438
4
5
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
5
10
-->
@Swagnarok
I would worry that a significant portion of voters would change their representatives too often or that power could be invested in a dangerous representative too much or too long.

Trump for example.

A period of time where someone is in office, 'ideally I think,
Allows them a past history by which they can be gauged.
I 'suppose such a history could also be developed on a day to day basis,
But I worry if they get rotated out a lot, whether their history would have a lasting 'impact on voters.

I worry that it might end up 'even more a reality TV show.
Drama and pandering.

New Live Poll Lets Pundits Pander To Viewers In Real Time
Video included as a joke.

Still, I think it could be interesting if a voluntary society decided to 'test such an idea.
. . .

Part of the reason we elect people for a length of time,
Is so they have time to familiarize themself with the history and legal of their office (Ideally)

Sometimes they have access to 'hidden information, military, diplomatic, science.

We don't elect a new doctor everyday or a new baker.