Trump has named Alex Jones as the press secretary. This is going to be a fun 4 years
https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1854631934355194176
Trump names his press secretary
Posts
Total:
31
Candace owens urges Trump to place Alex Jones as press secretary
https://x.com/ClemZiroli/status/1854427085026238822
Shit Don Jr wants it to happen. This needs to occur
How jones handles neocon bitches
https://youtu.be/wuC2tdSPMVg?si=5ReHJGaes2hJxJJR
https://youtu.be/wuC2tdSPMVg?si=5ReHJGaes2hJxJJR
I think this is still a joke.
Oh please no
-->
@Mharman
THEY'RE TURNING THE PRESS ROOM GAY!
I refuse to believe he chose him of all people
-->
@WyIted
Trump has named Alex Jones as the press secretary. This is going to be a fun 4 years
Yeah, nothing like rewarding the guy who made a fortune off of exploiting the misery of parents who lost their children in a school shooting with a top job in the White House.
You’re a sick individual, so of course you support Trump.
-->
@Double_R
He speculated on a conspiracy theory. There are no sacred cows, fuck off with your fascist anti free speech rhetoric
-->
@WyIted
He speculated on a conspiracy theory
He spent months propagating the overt lie that it was all faked and that the parents of those kids were actors playing a role in a massive government conspiracy to take away everyone’s guns. He said this explicitly, it was not speculation.
That aside, I suspect where you are trying to go with this defense is to point to his presentation of all of this as “just asking questions” which everyone knows is bullshit. This is how every conspiracy theory works from the moon landings to 9/11 - the conspiracy theorists never, out loud, say what they think actually happened because then not only would they sound ridiculous but then they would be making a claim themselves which they have no evidence for. It’s all about attacking “the official story” and then pretending that if they can poke enough holes in it their conspiracy wins by default. It doesn’t. It’s a fundamental failure of logic and critical thinking, hiding behind “just asking questions” doesn’t change that.
fuck off with your fascist anti free speech rhetoric
Throwing in all the buzzwords there I see. To bad you don’t know what any of them mean.
Free speech doesn’t give you the right to defame other people by lying about them, first of all, so all of the court cases against him were perfectly legitimate in that sense.
With regards to the rest you love to attack “cancel culture” as anti free speech which is just ridiculous. What’s illegal and possibly facist is to stop speech from a position of government power, that’s why the first amendment only limits the government. What you’re talking about is the rights of others to criticize you, which is itself free speech. So yes you have the right to say all the crazy and vile things you want, and I have the right to call you out on it and if I should so choose, I can boycott your work and call for others to do the same, or if I own a business I can stop using my business to support yours. That’s called free speech, so it’s not me who’s against it. Look in the mirror, and learn something about what you are talking about.
-->
@Double_R
Trump has named Alex Jones as the press secretary. This is going to be a fun 4 yearsYeah, nothing like rewarding the guy who made a fortune off of exploiting the misery of parents who lost their children in a school shooting with a top job in the White House.
How is speculating about a false flag conspiracy "exploiting the misery of parents"?
People have a right to advance conspiracy theories about government behavior. If they didn't then how much money was raised off the "very fine people" hoax? (or the russia collusion hoax, or the bloodbath hoax, or the kyle rittenhouse hoax, or the Covington kid hoax, or the liz chenney execution hoax, etc... etc...) I see all the same elements there:
1.) Bad thing happened
2.) People spread false information about it
3.) Those people were paid
-->
@Double_R
Months eh? So how about you post videos of the first and last time he speculated?He speculated on a conspiracy theoryHe spent months propagating the overt lie that it was all faked and that the parents of those kids were actors playing a role in a massive government conspiracy to take away everyone’s guns. He said this explicitly, it was not speculation.
This would be a great press Secretary!
It would be a verbal bloodbath in the press room! LOL
Nobody believes the press secretary anyways, so why not have fun with it.
-->
@DavidAZZ
Nobody believes the press secretary anyways, so why not have fun with it.
Oh yea, they could give him double doses of testosterone before press conferences and then we could have fun watching him literally growl (like a wolf) at journalists who try to interrupt a rant.
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
LOL!
YES!!! This would get amazing ratings and then maybe we can get informed, or at least, engaged voters next election.
-->
@Double_R
. This is how every conspiracy theory works from the moon landings to 9/11 - the conspiracy theorists never, out loud, say what they think actually happened because then not only would they sound ridiculous but then they would be making a claim themselves which they have no evidence for
I know you want to ban free speech but I will take the bait on this portion of your statement because it is a fundamental misunderstanding of conspiracy theorists.
The theorists typically look at the official narrative and poke holes in it. Correct on that point.
If a theorists us not proposing an alternate theory than it may just be them stating that the official story can't be trusted and we should be more skeptical of institutions that we really should be able to trust.
If a conspiracy theory poses a theory, that is a different story. You can see if you can find holes in it and see if they made mistakes just like the official narrative and then see if you can create a narrative more consistent with the fact is yourself . Or I guess you could also just blindly trust the official narrative or blindly trust the conspiracy theorists narrative. Your choice
-->
@Double_R
With regards to the rest you love to attack “cancel culture” as anti free speech which is just ridiculous. What’s illegal and possibly facist is to stop speech from a position of government power, that’s why the first amendment only limits the government.
There are literally Twitter files released showing pressure by the government to censor information. Also deep state politicians like Paul Ryan, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and Nikki Haley have all called for government controlled speech in some fashion.
Besides that we can see what you left tards did in England letting pedophiles out to arrest people for Twitter posts and know you are trying to bring that to America.
We can literally look at places like England and see what your plans are for 5 years from now or look at California to see where your plans for 10 years down the road are.
Besides we collectively saw during covid every mention of a Wuhan lab theory cause every major platform to censor speech.
You are also inconsistent with your beliefs anyway because you guys literally would arrest bakers for not baking cakes for a gay wedding despite literally 20k bakeries in the United States but then when all of internet traffic is basically between 5 sites then you are okay with rights violations because it isn't the government doing. It.
So why exactly are you so fast to suck the dicks of billionaires but God forbid a baker decide he doesn't want to make a cake.
Not that I expect consistency from the left because your criticisms are not about intellectual honesty are they? Because you would defend a baker from having to make a cake with a Nazi Insignia.
So really you are just an unprincipled person. Because you are weak. And ultimately you align with the left because you sense you are subhuman filth and if the weak can collectivize against the strong, maybe by some fake moral code they think makes them superior, than they can feel superior
I am going to let you know something the left that has brain washed you doesn't want you to know. You have a strength inside of you and if you are currently weak you can become strong. If you are weak in moral character you are not powerless, you can overcome yourself.
This lie that operates at a subconscious level where you believe you are weak is causing you and by extension society harm. Just man up. Don't be a pussh anymore. Go to the gym. Read philosophy books. Work so hard you think you might die. You got this bro
-->
@Double_R
Unable to post it to Wylted as well. Says he’s not active.
In the minds of people like Wylted is that American school shootings have to be a conspiracy or they would need to revise their beliefs. What Some consider integrity, just grows resentment until they have psychotic breaks.
I think the lying false narrative lizard people---ex Laura Loomer and Elon Musk Trumpet-- are still with us.
They can easily fool us............dont fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool...R P Feynman
-->
@Reece101
In the minds of people like Wylted is that American school shootings have to be a conspiracy or they would need to revise their beliefs. What Some consider integrity, just grows resentment until they have psychotic breaks.
I never said it was a conspiracy. I just defended Alex Jones first amendment rights and the character assassination as well.
There are countries with high rates of gun ownership that do not have school shooting problems. The root issue is not the guns.
Even if the root issue was guns though, freedom is much more important. Not sure why you would want to adopt Hitler's policicies of disarming citizens
-->
@WyIted
I never said it was a conspiracy. I just defended Alex Jones first amendment rights and the character assassination as well.
You believe misinformation/disinformation are equivalent to truth.
There are countries with high rates of gun ownership that do not have school shooting problems. The root issue is not the guns.
It’s the mental illness you help to perpetuate.
Even if the root issue was guns though, freedom is much more important. Not sure why you would want to adopt Hitler's policicies of disarming citizens
Hitler was free. Freedom means nothing in the face of death.
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
How is speculating about a false flag conspiracy "exploiting the misery of parents"?
He wasn’t speculating. He said explicitly that it was a false flag.
People have a right to advance conspiracy theories about government behavior.
He didn’t limit his propaganda to the government, he directly accused the parents of the slaughtered children of being crisis actors in his imaginary plot. Accusing someone of being a government plant doesn’t give you the free speech shield of criticizing the government.
Months eh? So how about you post videos of the first and last time he speculated?
Why don’t you tell me, since you seem to think a more limited timeframe a valid defense.
-->
@WyIted
If a theorists us not proposing an alternate theory than it may just be them stating that the official story can't be trusted and we should be more skeptical of institutions that we really should be able to trust.
This is fundamentally dishonest. Saying we shouldn’t trust institutions doesn’t lead anyone to the conclusion that any given event was a false flag, yet that’s what the conspiracy theorists focus on so clearly that’s what they believe and want other people to believe. You pretend that accusing the government of lying to cover up “the truth” about events like 9/11 or Sandy hook do not have obvious and nefarious implications which is just ridiculous.
Moreover, another giveaway that this is BS is that conspiracy theorists never stop with the government. Anyone who is involved in any way, including witnessing these kinds of events becomes part of the conspiracy. Like the parents of the slaughtered Sandy Hook children, or I think of Mark Bingham’s mother who they attacked with death threats because she said it wasn’t unusual for her son to give his full name. Anyone who poor’s cold water on their fantasy narrative is immediately castigated.
This is not about being more skeptical of institutions, it’s very clear what this is about.
-->
@Double_R
This is fundamentally dishonest. Saying we shouldn’t trust institutions doesn’t lead anyone to the conclusion that any given event was a false flag
You are the one who claimed false flag. If the official narrative is wrong there could be other reasons for that.
I would say it is fair to accuse them of a false flag or a cover up kind of as a pressure tactic to get them to be more honest but there could be other reasons for the cover up such as with the JFK assassination where they were trying to prevent an international incident.
that’s what they believe and want other people to believe.
So they believe differently than you and are bad guys for noticing facts that don't align with the official version of events?
. Like the parents of the slaughtered Sandy Hook children, or I think of Mark Bingham’s mother who they attacked with death threats because she said it wasn’t unusual for her son to give his full name. Anyone who poor’s cold water on their fantasy narrative is immediately castigated.
This is a lie. So when you prevent a conspiracy usually you are aware your theory could be wrong but it is a mental exercise to provide a different explanation of events.
Alex jones did not call to threaten anyone and HE didn't tell anyone to. Its also retarded to.
The reason you know the threatening phone calls are a lie is by using common sense.
If you are claiming somebody is a crisis actor and doesn't exist, than how would you get their phone number to threaten them?
The ability to even contact them pretty much disproves the crisis actor theory so no, nobody who believes somebody is a crisis actor with a bunch of fake details would threaten them after disproven their own theory by finding them.
-->
@Double_R
How is speculating about a false flag conspiracy "exploiting the misery of parents"?He wasn’t speculating. He said explicitly that it was a false flag.
Rachel Maddow said explicitly that OAN was a "paid Russian disinformation". Judge said reasonable people knew she was full of shit (speculating).
So... were these judges psuedojudges?
The "cushioned with an undisputed news story" is cute, so was what Alex Jones said.
People have a right to advance conspiracy theories about government behavior.He didn’t limit his propaganda to the government, he directly accused the parents of the slaughtered children of being crisis actors in his imaginary plot.
Directly, as in by name?
Months eh? So how about you post videos of the first and last time he speculated?Why don’t you tell me, since you seem to think a more limited timeframe a valid defense.
Well if the timeframe isn't relevant, then why mention it?
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I actually did watch Alex Jones trial. He lost because he was being uncooperative and going on random rants. Basically he lost the judgement because he didn't defend himself and had a shitty lawyer.
I think because he basically laid down and treated the trial as an excuse to make unhinged rants his loss is unable to be challenged and had he shut his mouth and had competent representation he would have won.
TlDR- So he didn't lose because of any evidence against him. He lost because he pissed off the judges.
-->
@WyIted
Real judges are objective and are not swayed by who is offensive to them.
When cops arrest you for giving them the finger, that's a violation of rights. Same with judges.
-->
@WyIted
There are literally Twitter files released showing pressure by the government to censor information.
And the people at Twitter made very clear that this was a conscious decision on their part to work with the government to root out disinformation. The fact that a few agents on the government’s end got a bit overzealous on their emails doesn’t change that fact. If you believe in free speech that means Twitter has every right to run their platform as they saw fit and there is no evidence that anything they did fell out of line with that.
Also deep state politicians like Paul Ryan, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and Nikki Haley have all called for government controlled speech in some fashion.
They called for the reversal of section 230, as has Trump.
“President Donald J. Trump has called to repeal the law and signed an executive order attempting to curb some of its protections, though the order has been challenged in court. More recently, he threatened to veto the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), an annual defense funding bill, if it does not revoke Section 230”
Besides that we can see what you left tards did in England
I have no interest in whatever anecdote you want to quote from England. Next.
Besides we collectively saw during covid every mention of a Wuhan lab theory cause every major platform to censor speech.
Social media platforms are not the government. Next.
Not that I expect consistency from the left because your criticisms are not about intellectual honesty are they? Because you would defend a baker from having to make a cake with a Nazi Insignia.
These are completely different things. The ruling forcing bakers to make a cake for a gay wedding is about protecting LGBTQ people from discrimination. Forcing someone to bake a cake with a swastica is about symbolism of an idea, that is totally different.
I am going to let you know something the left that has brain washed you doesn't want you to know. You have a strength inside of you and if you are currently weak you can become strong. If you are weak in moral character you are not powerless, you can overcome yourself.
lol how pathetic.
Here’s something you don’t know; you are grossly ignorant of how anyone on the left thinks and what motivates it. But the good news is you can overcome yourself, and it starts right here. All you have to do is read the words written and apply real English meaning to them, stop searching for the caricature your mind creates and instead try to actually understand, then maybe you’ll recognize how ridiculous your cartoonish demonization of the left really is.
-->
@WyIted
This is fundamentally dishonest. Saying we shouldn’t trust institutions doesn’t lead anyone to the conclusion that any given event was a false flagYou are the one who claimed false flag.
WTF? I’m quoting what conspiracy theorists say every time they raise issues with the “official story”. I’m not claiming false flag, I’m arguing against that allegation.
I would say it is fair to accuse them of a false flag or a cover up kind of as a pressure tactic to get them to be more honest
The time to accuse the government of a false flag is when there’s evidence to support it. “I don’t understand the official story” is not evidence.
So they believe differently than you and are bad guys for noticing facts that don't align with the official version of events?
They are bad because they are spreading damaging and dangerous disinformation all based on arguments rooted in their own ignorance and lack of willingness to accept reality for what it is. It’s fundamentally dishonest and grotesque.
This is a lie. So when you prevent a conspiracy usually you are aware your theory could be wrong but it is a mental exercise to provide a different explanation of events.
Philosophical exercises are fine, provided you are grounded in intellectual honesty and consistency and thereby willing to accept whatever comes out of them. That’s the opposite of a conspiracy theorist, which is exactly why the term conspiracy theorist is used as a pejorative.
Conspiracy theorists don’t change their position in the face of evidence, they simply adapt their conspiracy to the new evidence. A witness comes out and says they saw it happen? They must be working for the conspirators. A group of professionals comes out and explains why the official story holds up? They must be getting paid off by the conspirators. As the conspiracy becomes more implausible, the scale of the conspiracy grows. Conspiracy theorists will change their entire world view around the conspiracy rather than apply their world view to the evidence. And ideas don’t live in a vacuum, so fallacious reasoning towards one proposition will likely make its way towards other propositions. That’s why people who accept one conspiracy are likely to accept others, thereby driving the individual further and further away from reality.
Alex jones did not call to threaten anyone and HE didn't tell anyone to.
That’s not the charge. When you tell your millions of followers the parents are part of a false flag operation aimed to play on your fears in order to take away your guns what the hell do you think is going to happen?
If you are claiming somebody is a crisis actor and doesn't exist, than how would you get their phone number to threaten them?
The parents are the alleged crisis actors genius, the kids who were killed are the ones who allegedly don’t exist.