Perhaps the computers are taking over!
Paintings with no painter.
Posts
Total:
8
25 days later
67 days later
Can't wait for them to get better than humans at writing
23 days later
I use a 3d printer to model all of my pointillism in real life...I think I'm still better than those silly computers.
-->
@secularmerlin
That's because they can easily replicate the randomness that is modern art.
-->
@ResurgetExFavilla
Hehehe... nice reference.
-->
@Mharman
Some of the images look more than random. They aren't Jackson Pollackesque sprays of dots they look like paintings of objects. Perhaps a bit abstract but if you read the article that is more like human art than a lackluster computer paint by numbers. This is what the researchers were trying to do. Honestly what makes human paintings more qualified as works of art than any of the images presented? Art stubbornly defies definition and pushes boundaries. What constitutes art is subjective not objective.
153 days later
REEEEE