Preserving the human condition

Author: Math_Enthusiast

Posts

Total: 8
Math_Enthusiast
Math_Enthusiast's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 195
0
2
7
Math_Enthusiast's avatar
Math_Enthusiast
0
2
7
One of the best experiences of my life was a week-long camping trip. I am going to leave out any specific details of where it was, but all you need to know is that we spent a lot of time kayaking. Everything we had with us, which wasn't much because of the storage limitations, was in the kayaks in dry bags. Each morning we would wake up early, have breakfast, pack up the tents, put everything in dry bags, load them into the kayaks, and set out to our next location. We would stop for lunch at some point along the way, or have lunch at our final destination if we were kayaking a shorter distance that day. Once we arrived at our destination, we would unload the kayaks, set up our tents, and eat.

Depending on your idea of fun, my anecdote may have sounded very appealing to you. Even if it didn't, you were probably at least already aware that this kind of activity would be someone's idea of a good time. Why do I point this out? Because it doesn't make any sense. Well, not by the standard that most of us apply to our own lives and the lives of others anyway. This trip was hard work, and it was uncomfortable. None of us liked constantly packing and unpacking everything. Our arms were usually very tired when we had just reached our halfway point. My legs get incredibly twitchy when I don't move them for a long time, and keeping them under the spray skirt for hours and hours was far worse than even my exhausted arms. Many of us got sunburnt, making sleeping on the already hard, uneven ground with only the flexible bottom of a tent in between even worse. To anyone who enjoys camping and other challenging activities, this is just part of the experience, but even they will join everyone else in complaining that life is too hard, too stressful, and too annoying. Who wouldn't like to have a higher income to make their life more relaxed? Who wouldn't like to take some extra days off of work? Who wouldn't like to see technology continue to make our lives easier and more convenient? And yet we go camping. We train for and run marathons, requiring physical and mental endurance. We add extra work to our lives with passion projects, which are fun, but often leave us burnt out. We love to challenge ourselves, yet we wish our lives were less challenging. Why?

We need some difficulty in our life, but not for the reason most people think.

A lot of people are aware that a truly "perfect" life, a life where you get whatever you want whenever you want it, isn't actually all that appealing. I hear so many people say that this is because without the bad moments of life, you can never appreciate the good ones. Often, people refer to the concept of hedonistic adaptation, where you get used to a better life such that it effectively becomes the same as your old one. (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/690806/) By this logic, though, shouldn't a perfect life be equivalent to a normal one, and not outright nightmarish? Take this Twilight Zone episode for example. The episode follows Rocky Valentine as he finds himself in what he thinks is heaven. By the end of the episode, he discovers that this is not heaven, it is hell. According to hedonistic adaptation, shouldn't this just seem no better but also no worse than his life on earth? How does paradise become torture? I am aware that this is just a TV show, but it is valuable as a thought experiment, and I think most of us would share Rocky Valentine's feelings in this situation. Here is where I'm going to make a bold claim: The results of the study on hedonistic adaptation were misinterpreted, and there is a different, more accurate explanation for both why the lottery winners and accident victims were equally content with their lives, and why the lottery winners took less pleasure from the same mundane events as the accident victims. The amount of money you have, or the tragedies that you have experienced, while important, are not the primary factors in happiness. It is something much more abstract–fulfillment–that actually determines happiness. Fulfillment, at least as I mean it here, is fundamentally in contradiction with perfect ease of living. The simple answer to why we do the things that I described in the previous paragraph is because they are fulfilling. A fulfilling activity (Once again, at least as I mean it here. There are a lot of interpretations of this word.) is one you are motivated to do independent of anything else, not in spite of, but because of the challenge that it presents. This kind of endeavor plays a crucial role in our lives, and yet when talking about what makes us happy, we hardly ever recognize it. Rocky Valentine was robbed of any opportunity for this kind of fulfillment, and this was his hell. As to the lottery winners taking less pleasure in mundane events? Another one word answer presents itself: Boredom. Lottery winners have all of the material things that they could ever want. Whatever "mundane events" they could have been exposed to would likely have been something that they could experience whenever they wanted. I feel inclined to believe that the lottery winners would have enjoyed a camping trip just as much as the accident victims.

How much do we really want technology to do for us?

How would you like to live in a future where everything is done for us? No one has to write another song because AI can do it faster, better, and cheaper. No one has to draw another drawing or paint another painting because AI can do it faster, better, and cheaper. No one has to write another book because AI can do it faster, better, and cheaper. No one has to invent anything because AI can do it faster, better, and cheaper. You don't have to do anything! Just sit back and relax! Finally you don't have to do any work! Oh, you went out of your way to write a song? What a strange thing to do! What a waste of time! After all, all the AI generated music is so much better than human created music now. How unpolished your music sounds. No one will listen to that! Oh, you spent hours on a work of art? Why would you use such unnecessary effort? You could have gotten a far more refined image off of your computer in seconds! No one is interested in that silly picture you just wasted so much time making, they would much rather generate their own images! Is this the world we want to live in? Do we really want to become Rocky Valentine?

This isn't a problem of the future; it's a problem of the present. Artists who don't want their artwork stolen only to be regurgitated in one thousand different forms by an AI, all for free, are met with claims that they are simply afraid of the next step in our technological development. AI music is beginning to develop, and as someone who values music as a method of deep human communication, I am worried about the impact that this could have. Perhaps even more worrying is the areas that are left defenseless because they are not recognized as an art form. AI game development is becoming a very real thing, and while I think that this could reduce the tedium of writing tens of thousands of lines of code, making it an invaluable tool for programmers, I don't think it should ever take over game development completely. Games like The Beginners Guide and Pleh are, like other art, a powerful and unusual form of human communication. In a world of exclusively AI game development, these games may never see the light of day again. Another such area is math. If the concept of math as an art is alien to you, and you associate it only with grinding through complicated algorithmic processes in school which you never really understood, I suggest you read A Mathematician's Lament by Paul Lockhart. We live in a world where the concept of mathematical creativity is not only bizarre to almost everyone, but where any natural intuition of it is crushed out of our youth. This makes me worried that the joy of math may become completely lost to time in the near future as AI solves the unsolved problems which humans once delighted in investigating. If math is seen as just a burden by the majority, then people such as myself (see my username) may be much more likely to suffer the same fate as I described for an artist and musician in the previous paragraph.

If this still doesn't feel very "here and now," let me bring social media to your attention. Less and less do people meet up with their friends at a coffee shop or a restaurant or simply take a walk together. I'm sure I sound old right now, but while I will not disclose my exact age, I think it is important that you know that I am most certainly not elderly. There is something so uniquely wonderful about just taking a walk through the woods with a friend, but now this kind of thing is often seen as too much effort. Why not just sit at home texting? Why not use Facetime? Why not just talk on Snapchat or look at your friend's latest Instagram post? Who wants to put in the time and effort to go for a walk? If you haven't noticed this is the exact mentality that I described a couple of paragraphs ago. If you thought that we could never fall into such a strange view of the world, you can now be quite confident that it can happen. That key phrase is repeated in so many places and in so many forms in the modern world: "I don't want to put in the effort." We are already forgetting the truest version of ourselves. We are already losing the beautiful parts of the human condition.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 354
Posts: 10,534
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
I live by Tao.

Least effort, maximum effect, and avoiding obstacles.

But people dont understand Tao.

Tao is like water which doesnt crush, doesnt compete, doesnt contend. It avoids obstacles.

Tao life is such, if you avoid bad things, your life will be good.

Thus, avoid all that is bad and do that which is good.

That is the simple secret of Tao.

Such is Tao.

Tao is simple, yet no one can understand it.

Tao doesnt compete, yet it defeats all competition.


How much do we really want technology to do for us?
Sex robots who also do our work for us. Well, maybe one robot for work, the other for sex.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,051
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Best.Korea
You're simple.

But you understand it.

HaHa only joking.


Tao for all, requires universal equality of everything.


But I'm not sure if Tao for all is compatible with universal progression.


And I'm also not sure if Taoists are always as content as they say they are.


Sex robots, far too cumbersome...Orgasmic implants are the way forwards...Just download the multi-penetration app.


Tissues still required.





zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,051
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Doing the same stuff day in and day out, eventually becomes tedious.

Work and leisure.

Yin and Yang.


Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,334
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
I'm not sure about 'all humans needing challenges,
But I 'do suspect most humans need challenges.

"You get the right amount of stress and we call it stimulation.
The goal in life isn't to get rid of stress, the goal in life is to have the right type of stress.
Because when it is the right type we love it.
We jump out of our seats to experience it, we pay good money to get stressed that way.
It tends to be a moderate stressor, where you've got a stressor that's transient.
It's not for nothing that roller coaster rides are not three weeks long, and most of all what they're about is you relinquish a little bit of control in a setting that overall feels safe."
- Robert Sapolsky

I think there's something in our bodies/brains/design, that seeks it.
Same as I think 'most people need to socialize,
Though some people are hermits, seem to enjoy it,
Whether because of being outliers or fulfilling that need with something else.
. . .

I think people who aren't achieving Maslow's bottom two needs, physical needs, safety needs,
Have a harder time being happy,
Luxury/Money, is just seen as an obvious 'fix to those two, and to social standing often, since people's admiration can sometimes be bought.
. . .

I 'do think there is still value in making art or music, for the fact it came from 'oneself,
That one is developing their brain/self/soul,
Some people still practice martial arts, as a form of exercise and development.
People can organize in less tech social groups, like the Amish.
, , , Still. . . Who's to say what human culture or genetics will 'become?
. . . Many might find it easy to slip into luxury, whether it brings happiness/meaning, or not.

zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,051
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Lemming
Hi Lemming.

I would suggest that challenges come in all shapes and sizes.

And that there is stress and then there is stress.

Comprising two broad categories; mental and physical.

Which are nonetheless, inextricably linked.

If life and survival under whatever circumstances is deemed to be tough, then wellbeing is impacted.

But if life and survival, though equally as physically and mentally demanding, is deemed to be enjoyable, then wellbeing is enhanced.

It's really about how individuals and to an extent families and societies, have been programmed to overthink and respond to physiological challenges.
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 3,334
4
4
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
4
10
-->
@zedvictor4
I imagine there 'have been soldiers in history,
Who have had a rip roaring good time,
Though many others might have ended up with PTSD in the same circumstances.

Outcomes depending on their perspectives of the events.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,051
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Lemming
Exactly.


Hope you're well Lemming.

Always nice to chat with you.