Fine S Constant 11/3

Author: ebuc

Posts

Total: 7
Topic's author
#1
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,888
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Using Pi, ---divided by 430.5---, this is the new, closet way Ive found to approximating the FSC value

................................................................0.00 72 97......54391077768464
FSC { refined accuracy in Paris } =.........0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35

Pi { shortened } 3.141591^3.00003 =....31.00 72 9...2 54 99 542548225..<<< this is closet  alternative way to arrive at almost FSC

Pi^3.00003 =..........................................31.00 7...3 41 51 29 30 84 72 01 62 1375714128..<<<2nd closet way

This following is not Feynnman speaking, it is someone else and I got fooled first time around. However, he does offer a solution, ---many out there on the net---  that I cannot speak to.

..." This number actually represents the probability that an electron will absorb a photon. However, this number has more significance in the fact that it relates three very important domains of physics: electromagnetism in the form of the charge of the electron, 

relativity in the form of the speed of light, and

 quantum mechanics in the form of Planck’s constant. "...

Another thought I hope to explore, is that of the VE{ vector equilibrium  --as 5-fold 10 great circles/tori as as a bosonic photon---, that contracts/twists/collapses to the fermionic matter electron as the double-valenced octahedron ---ergo the 4-fold 3 - 6, 2-D great circles ergo 3D great tori as then I associated with my Space-time Tori.

The best place for me to start is the prime radius vectorvalue of the icosahedron as it is created from the contracting/twist/collapase  of VE --as jitterbug---,  ergo, the 5-fold's 10 great tori overall diameter ergo two radii radius i.e. (<---)|(--->) wherein the single vertical line { | } is the exact center of the tori.

In synergetics, this radius is confusing as Fuller uses a prime vector value of 2 and prime radius is 1.  When Fuller uses the 15 great circles of the 5-fold icosahedron as the basic reference, for the other polyhedra, from center to face of each polyhedron, referenced to a perfect sphere of radius value 1.

He shows the Icosahedron radius { i 3 } at the  following link as length value of  0.977

Again, Synergetics prime vector value ergo diameter of perfect sphere as two{ 2 } makes the math confusing to classical geometry where the diameter value is one { 1 }.  So the above 0.977 value is perhaps divided by two, however, I dont think it as simple as that to convert.

That said, if were only doing our considerations of FSC via a radius value --and not classical diameter value of one{ 1 }---   of a sphere, we can use these values in accordance with FSC being 1 divided by 137 i.e. for the icosahedron radius value of i 3 at above link, we take 0.977 / 137 and arrive at

0.00713138686131386861313868613139

vs classical

1 / 137 = .................................................0.00 72 9.....9 27007, that was refined by the French experiments as,

FSC { refined accuracy in Paris } =.........0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35

0.977052485 / 137 = ..............................0.00 71........3176996350364963503649635036

What does this mean to me or any others? I dunno. Im exploring what does this and top of the page Pi have to do with understanding the mystery why  FSC  value is that number specifically.
#2
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 354
Posts: 10,534
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Omg you can see the matrix!
Topic's author
#3
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,888
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
1} French FSC process > 1/137.035 99 92 06 =
........................................0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35 75 15 76 12 44 25 34 --has 12 digit accruacy or more with 12 th2 postion 2--
2}  New Pi divisor Pi/ 430.51 12 87 99 86 76 36 65 52 71 49 99 =
.......................................0.00 72 97 35 25 69 3 ---has 11 digit accuracy with 11th position 9
3} Old Pi divisor Pi/430.5 =
.......................................0.00 72 97 54 39 10 77 76 84 64 --- has only 6 digit accuracy with 6th postion 7
4} Pi { shortened } 3.141591^3.00003 =
......................................31.00 72 92 54 99 542548225 --has 5 digit accuracy
5} My original find Pi^3.00003 =
.......................................31.00 73 41 51 29 30 84 72 01 62 1375714128 only 3 digit accuracy on the irrational side and of course the 31 is makes that find less interesting to most, however, my naive ego takes interest in that the new and  old Pi divisor 43.511287 etc rounds off to 431 and is like  my whole prime number  31 on rational side of resultant in my original find.

..." Here we use matter-wave interferometry to measure the recoil velocity of a rubidium atom that absorbs a photon, and determine the fine-structure constant α−1 = 137.035999206(11) with a relative accuracy of 81 parts per trillion. The accuracy of eleven digits in α leads to an electron g factor1,2—the most precise prediction of the standard model—that has a greatly reduced uncertainty. "...






#4
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,550
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Best.Korea

You know that ebuc is really Neo, don't you?
#5
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 354
Posts: 10,534
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@FLRW
Yes!
Topic's author
#6
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,888
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Revised 11/12/2024 see new Pi divisor in line 2 { in bold } below a person using Wolfram Calculator provided to me

However, since Pi is an abstract perfect circle, --such does not exist as an occupied space of Universe---  it may be more logically, common sense critical thinking to say were dealing with a high frequency occupied space polygonal at best, and in this way, our Pi value would be shorter when assigning a value with our exploration of FSC in occupied space Universe.

1} French FSC process > 1/137.035 99 92 06 =
........................................0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35 75 15 76 12 44 25 34 --has 12 digit accruacy or more with 12 th2 postion 2--
2}  New Pi divisor > Pi/ 430.51 12 87 99 86 76 36 65 52 71 49 99 =
.......................................0.00 72 97 35 25 69 3 ---has 11 digit accuracy with 11th position 9
3} Old Pi divisor Pi/430.5 =
.......................................0.00 72 97 54 39 10 77 76 84 64 --- has only 6 digit accuracy with 6th position 7
4} Pi { shortened } 3.141591^3.00003 =
......................................31.00 72 92 54 99 542548225 --has 5 digit accuracy
5} My original find Pi^3.00003 =
.......................................31.00 73 41 51 29 30 84 72 01 62 1375714128 only 3 digit accuracy on the irrational side and of course the 31-prime makes that find less interesting to most, however, my naive ego takes interest in that the new and  old Pi divisor 431.511287 etc rounds off to 431-prime and is like  my whole prime number  31p on rational side of resultant in my original find.

..." The cube root of 31 is the value of π correct to four significant figures:
3 cubed root of  3 1 = 3.141 38065 …"

..." The numbers 31, 331, 3331, 33331, 333331, 3333331, and 33333331 are all prime "

.." 431 twin prime with 433"...

 ..." 431 squared (4312) is 185761

...431 cubed (4313) is 80062991

...The square root of 431 is 20.7605394921

...The cube root of 431 is 7.5536888251"...

To reiterate, I need to shorten Pi in order to use the divisor 431. I did this once before on item #4 above { shortened Pi }





Topic's author
#7
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,888
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
In regards to the above post #6:

To reiterate, I need to shorten Pi in order to use the divisor 431. I did this once before on item #4 above { shortened Pi }

Also I take note of my original Pi^3 = 31.00 73... in that 73 is a mirror and mersene prime and that is Buckys 73 primary great circles, as considered when the 87 primary great circles have their redundant 14 { 7 + 7 } GrC's subtracted from the 87 i.e. 87 - 14 = 73