Using Pi, ---divided by 430.5---, this is the new, closet way Ive found to approximating the FSC value
................................................................0.00 72 97......54391077768464
FSC { refined accuracy in Paris } =.........0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35
Pi { shortened } 3.141591^3.00003 =....31.00 72 9...2 54 99 542548225..<<< this is closet alternative way to arrive at almost FSC
Pi^3.00003 =..........................................31.00 7...3 41 51 29 30 84 72 01 62 1375714128..<<<2nd closet way
This following is not Feynnman speaking, it is someone else and I got fooled first time around. However, he does offer a solution, ---many out there on the net--- that I cannot speak to.
..." This number actually represents the probability that an electron will absorb a photon. However, this number has more significance in the fact that it relates three very important domains of physics: electromagnetism in the form of the charge of the electron,
relativity in the form of the speed of light, and
quantum mechanics in the form of Planck’s constant. "...
Another thought I hope to explore, is that of the VE{ vector equilibrium --as 5-fold 10 great circles/tori as as a bosonic photon---, that contracts/twists/collapses to the fermionic matter electron as the double-valenced octahedron ---ergo the 4-fold 3 - 6, 2-D great circles ergo 3D great tori as then I associated with my Space-time Tori.
The best place for me to start is the prime radius vectorvalue of the icosahedron as it is created from the contracting/twist/collapase of VE --as jitterbug---, ergo, the 5-fold's 10 great tori overall diameter ergo two radii radius i.e. (<---)|(--->) wherein the single vertical line { | } is the exact center of the tori.
In synergetics, this radius is confusing as Fuller uses a prime vector value of 2 and prime radius is 1. When Fuller uses the 15 great circles of the 5-fold icosahedron as the basic reference, for the other polyhedra, from center to face of each polyhedron, referenced to a perfect sphere of radius value 1.
He shows the Icosahedron radius { i 3 } at the following link as length value of 0.977
Again, Synergetics prime vector value ergo diameter of perfect sphere as two{ 2 } makes the math confusing to classical geometry where the diameter value is one { 1 }. So the above 0.977 value is perhaps divided by two, however, I dont think it as simple as that to convert.
That said, if were only doing our considerations of FSC via a radius value --and not classical diameter value of one{ 1 }--- of a sphere, we can use these values in accordance with FSC being 1 divided by 137 i.e. for the icosahedron radius value of i 3 at above link, we take 0.977 / 137 and arrive at
0.00713138686131386861313868613139
vs classical
1 / 137 = .................................................0.00 72 9.....9 27007, that was refined by the French experiments as,
FSC { refined accuracy in Paris } =.........0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35
0.977052485 / 137 = ..............................0.00 71........3176996350364963503649635036
What does this mean to me or any others? I dunno. Im exploring what does this and top of the page Pi have to do with understanding the mystery why FSC value is that number specifically.
