So I am not sure whether you guys will be rioting or counter rioting on Januarg 6, however what do I bring to my first riot if the election goes past midnight (all elections not settled prior to midnight are stolen) than I expect maybe the riot may be delayed a few days but if I am rioting what tips do you guys have? If I end up counter rioting than what tips do people have for counter rioting?
My first riot on Jan 6. What do?
Posts
Total:
25
-->
@WyIted
I have no experience, as I rarely go outside lol
-->
@Best.Korea
Your patriotic duty is to riot if kamala loses
-->
@WyIted
Just support President Trump. Let's not go backwards. America so called is moving forward with being great and all.
-->
@WyIted
Don't go. The rule law is past tense in this country. Even if you destroy no property and harm no one you will be railroaded and sentences to months and years in prison. Protests are more likely to be traps set by the FBI where they will provide the violent provocateurs even if you don't bring any.
The vile scum which inhabit the city of DC are zombie drones and would not recognize justice if it was taped to the inside of their eyelids.
If it comes time for civil war, deny territory and impede logistical support to blue cities. That's all you need to do to win.
-->
@WyIted
Ask Ashli Babbitt.
Oops!
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Don't go. The rule law is past tense in this country
I wanted to explore this topic in detail in a thread because it's something unique to the leftist mind virus.
They essentially prefer the criminals to law and order. You get them defending criminal types such as Trayvon Martin who was quite obviously a gang member and attempting to intimidate a concerned citizen.
Meanwhile when somebody shoots a home invader or like the case with Mr. Neely in New York you get the left attacking the people who would stand up to criminals.
It's one thing if you go after vigilantes because it leads to something worse. However this is not what they are doing. When Neely died it was after an encounter where he was a threat to a lot of people on the bus and he had to be neutralized.
With Rittenhouse he is an apolitical guy who showed up to a BLM rally to honestly give anyone medical attention that needed it, and you can see him throwing away trash and helping rioters in videos prior to his encounter.
This guy is physically attacked and make no mistake he would be dead if he didn't defend himself.
They try to put him in prison. Almost once a month you have some case appear in the headlines where somebody defends themselves and they get painted the bad guy. It isn't always for race baiting purposes either.
I saw leftists get angry at this cop who shot and killed a white meth head. This cop was in an unmarked car and sitting in a secluded area. This white guy approaches the car and attempts to car jack jim. Methhead gets shot in the head and now the media in that area claims he thought the car was unoccupied and was innocently just checking up on the car or some other nonsense.
You can criticize the right wing for pissing on the legal system when they get out of hand, but at least with them it is typically just isolated to political enemies. With the left it is targeted towards law abiding citizens.
-->
@zedvictor4
Ask Ashli Babbitt.
Haha it is so funny that somebody died. Lol
-->
@WyIted
Well my satirical response to your cynical question inevitably contained dark humour.
Nonetheless.
Approximately 7700 people die everyday in the US.
130ish of which are gun related deaths.
Just a fact of American life, that Americans take for granted.
-->
@zedvictor4
130ish of which are gun related deaths.
Predominantly suicides, criminals killing each other and instances of self defense .
Anyone who is against old ladies being able to defend themselves against a rapist is probably a rapist
-->
@WyIted
If government didnt print trillions every year, economy would be much better. Lets hope that next president doesnt use money printer as often.
-->
@Best.Korea
I am sure that the party wanting to import a billion immigrants and give them free shit is the path to reducing government spending
-->
@WyIted
Reducing government spending is the path to prosperity. If voters knew that, it would be great. The less government spends, the more there is for economy to develop and grow. Economy works best when its not government managed. Simply, people doing what they want with their money instead of government telling them what to do with their money. If only we had a candidate who said "Sure, I will reduce spending of other people's money!".
-->
@Best.Korea
Actually I changed my mind. A ton of economic interventionism like in North Korea and Venezuela is good for the economy. We should do it to be prosperous like them
-->
@WyIted
US government should reduce its spending. If only Trump or Kamala reduced spending and didnt just increase it more, it would be great. Now, I guess Trump spending less than Kamala is better for economy. If Trump was also not Christian but more gay and if I was American citizen, then I would even vote for him.
-->
@Best.Korea
We both know you are jot voting at all
-->
@WyIted
Well, I am not an American citizen, so I cant vote. Sorry.
-->
@WyIted
Hmmmmmmm.
Straying from the previous a tad, but OK.
So are you saying that raping young and middle aged ladies is less of an issue.
Though for sure, self defence is an option and various methods and tools are available.
Nonetheless, murder is still a disproportionate option.
However, I'm still not sure that Ashli Babbitt was being raped.
And nor was she an old lady.
h
-->
@zedvictor4
Though for sure, self defence is an option and various methods and tools are available.
Sure. Tell me how a 75 year old lady fights off convicted rapist Mike tyson
-->
@WyIted
Hey!
You're fantasising now.
-->
@zedvictor4
Why are you advocating for raping senior citizens?
Why do you want my grandma to have no feasible way to fight off black rapists?
-->
@WyIted
Who was it said?
Ultimacy is the brinksmanship of delusion.
-->
@zedvictor4
Ultimacy is how you test the truthiness of ideals.
It helps to create the most inconvenient world for a person's ideas and see if they are still true.
Some examples
1. We should ban selective service
Ultimacy ideal to test if that is true. Imagine aliens who attack earth and it requires every able bodied male to defeat this alien horde and if a single able bodied male decides not to an accurate computer model has determined it Wil be the end of the species
The most inconvenient world has determined that selective service is going to be a good politicy for most people. Some libertarians would still oppose it on the basis that freedom is more valuable than the continued existence of mankind
So you always want to take your own ideals and kind of create the most inconvenient world possible for them and see if they still hold true. You Ideally should be able to recognize every opinion you hold and do the same.
It helps to create the most inconvenient world for a person's ideas and see if they are still true.
Some examples
1. We should ban selective service
Ultimacy ideal to test if that is true. Imagine aliens who attack earth and it requires every able bodied male to defeat this alien horde and if a single able bodied male decides not to an accurate computer model has determined it Wil be the end of the species
The most inconvenient world has determined that selective service is going to be a good politicy for most people. Some libertarians would still oppose it on the basis that freedom is more valuable than the continued existence of mankind
So you always want to take your own ideals and kind of create the most inconvenient world possible for them and see if they still hold true. You Ideally should be able to recognize every opinion you hold and do the same.
I've already got my horn hat ready just in case.
-->
@WyIted
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, truthiness indeed.
And although I can't imagine aliens attacking Earth,
Hypothetically they could be the size of a microbe, or the size of of something very very big.
Notwithstanding that libertarians can be hypocritical when necessary.
Of course the biggest blow to modern persons ideas would be the banning of personal computing and communication devices.
We are now as addicted to them, as we are to not walking devices....Lets ban them too.
Computing is only necessary for clever folk, so that they can eventually escape Prison Earth.
And not walking devices create fat lazy people..
My advice to you is, stay at home and dream of Blaire White.
Then you won't end up in heaven with Ashli.
Riots are for libertarians with nothing better to do.
And in my opinion anything attacking from an interstellar or intergalactic position, probably has the edge.
Best hide when they turn up.
As it was said.
Ultimacy is the Brinksmanship of delusion.