Fine Structure Constant 10/8/2024

Author: ebuc

Posts

Total: 6
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,095
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
The following is my { Ebuc } two methods of explorations with the Fine Structure Constant{ FSC } aka the ' couuping constant '.

..." The fine-structure constant α is of dimension 1 (i.e., it is simply a number) and very nearly equal to 1/137. It is the "coupling constant" or measure of the strength of the electromagnetic force that governs how electrically charged elementary particles (e.g., electron, muon) and light (photons) interact."..

Part 1}
FSC =  .............0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35 75 15 76 12 44 25 34
Pi^3.00003 = 31.00 73 41 51 29 30 84 72 01 62 13 75 71 41 2

The bold 2 in the above FSC is because France--some years back-- had made new fine tuning adjustment to the value that replaced the integer 9 with a 2.

The Pi^3.00003 value was my exploration. 31 appears here on rational side, and is significant to me, for three reasons.
1} the 5-fold icosahedron has a set of  31 primary great circles, as found in Synergetics { B Fuller } ---not presented is left-skew and right-skew set of the 31 ergo 62 great circles----
...Putting aside the whole rational 31, the differrence between 0.00 72 97 { FSC }  and .00 73 41 is 0.71 50 62 { Pi^3.0003 }...

2} Pi^3 { XYZ } = 31.00 62 7 66 80 2998201754763150671

3} some or many animals have 31 bilateral spinal nerves ---total 62 as both left and right 31---

Part 2 and more recent exploration}

FSC subdivisions via my Space-time Horn Tori Invaginations { frequency? }. 18/0, 24/0 etc, and I stop with 180/0 as that is 18 plus 100 and gives us our first repeat of the integers/digits of the initial 18/0. Any pattern we see in these irrationals is going be related to hexa jumps of six. I see some little patterns occurring.

...note: I first wanted to show the relation between the FSC and my Cosmic Pi-Time value { arrived at via Pi^4 minus Pi^3{ XYZ } }

 FSC = 0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35 75 15 76 12 44 25 34

FSC * 9,100.43 61 46 20 67 39 70 81 34 90 22 64 6,

 > = Cosmic Pi-Time... 66.40 90 91 03 40 02 43 72 36 44 03 32 68 87 05

Now below I begin the 

....note: 18/0 Space-time torus = 6 invaginations{ frequency }, and 24/0 = 12 invaginations { frequency }

FSC =..........0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35 75 15 76 12 44 25 34

18/0 > /6 =.. 0.00 12 16 22 54 27 13 11 89 29

24/0 > /12 = 0.00 06 08 11 27 13 56 55 94 64

18/0......... = 0.00 04 05 40 84 75 71 03 96 43

>>>/180/ = 0.00 00 40 54 08 47 57 10 39 64----- note:....this is the repeat I spoke of above,  is significant to me, because, if we have 92 positive elements of Universe, and 92 negative elements of Universe that totals to 184. In Synergetics Fuller has a twones of diametically opposite axis poles added to any system, and a multiplicative twoness added to any system involing inside-ness and outside-ness. So we remove 4 of the 184 and we arrive at 180 above. I dunno

/24/0 .........= 0.00 03 04 0 56 3 56 78 27 97 32

/30/0......... = 0.00 0 24 3 24 50 85 42 62 37 85

/36/0...........0 = 0.00 02 02 70 42 37 85 51 98 21
---tho using a initial zero, the duals are tangent----

/42/0........... = 0.00 01 73 74 64 89 59 01 69 89
---no  symmetrical dual set numbers begin at 42 { 6 * 7 }-------

/48/0............ = 0.00 01 52 02 81 78 39 13 98 66

/54/0............ = 0.00 01 35 13 61 58 57 01 32 14

/60/0............ = 0.00 01 21 62 25 42 71 31 18 92

/66/0............ = 0.00 01 10 56 59 47 92 10 17 2
..../66.4 etc...= 0.00 01 09 89 52 26 75 79 48 35

/72/0............ = 0.00 01 01 35 21 18 92 75 99 1

/78/0............. = 0.00 00 93 55 58 02 08 70 14 56
----  first set of four initial zeros appear here at 78 and that is eleven interations of 18/0-----

/84/0............. = 0.00 00 86 87 32 44 79 50 84 94

/90/................ = 0.00 00 81 08 16 95 14 20 79 28

/96/0............... = 0.00 00 76 01 40 89 19 56 99 33

/102/................ = 0.00 00 71 54 26 72 18 41 87 6

/108/................ = 0.00 00 67 56 80 79 28 50 66 07

/114/................ = 0.00 00 64 011 86 4 58 58 5 20 6
---our return of a symmetrical dual set-----

/120/............ = 0.00 00 60 81 12 71 35 65 59 46

/126/0.......... = 0.00 00 57 91 54 96 53 00 56 63

/132/............ = 0.00 00 55 28 29 73 96 05 08 6

/138/............ = 0.00 00 52 87 93 66 39 70 08 23

/144/............ = 0.00 0 05 0 67 6 05 9 46 37 99 55
---here, using initial zero dual sets are not tangent---

/150/............ = 0.00 00 48 64 90 17 08 52 47 57

/156/............ = 0.00 00 46 77 79 01 04 35 07 28

/162/............ = 0.00 00 45 0 45 38 61 90 04 4 04
--first of two dual sets appear---

/168/............. = 0.00 00 43 43 66 22 39 75 42 47

/174/............. = 0.00 00 41 93 88 07 83 21 09 97

/180/............. = 0.00 00 40 54 08 47 57 10 39 64

Clarifying Addendum's to FSC:

The two primary factors or pathways involved in arriving at the invagination angle within the Space-time Torus are

1} ..the sum of invaginations I was refering to was the sum angles of invagination { v or ^ } equal the FSC.

...1a} in v , and then back out, from the outer positive curvature of Gravity (> <),

.....2a} in ^ and then back out, from inner negative curvature of Dark Energy  <)(>. 

With the minimal, 18/0 Space-time Horn Tori, we have six angles occurring at these numerical locations---the point of the angle---  in the 2D pattern of the 3D torus field
..18/0......3p......6......9.....12...15.

Here below is the partial presentation ---does not present the geodesic curvatures of torus--- between values 1-2p, 4-5p, 7p-8 etc of the four planes ---conceptually ascertained--  bisection of the horn torus.  Birds eye view of them would approximate this ...(    ((   ( )    ))     )....

.........1..............5p....7p................11p......13p...............17p...........loops back around
-
18/0......................6.............................12..............................18/0 loops back around and share 0 location
................3p.......................9................................15......................loops back around
-
...........2p.....4.................8......10......................14.....16.................loops back around


Conclusion:

 These angle values are of course smalle than the FSC, because all I did was subdivide FSC by number of angles involved in the torus frequency{ invaginations } to see if there was any aha! moment of revalation with  a pattern in the numerical values.

I found nothing of  revelationary significance with any particular value. At best, --and only a later afterthought, I would have hoped to find something of significance to my Cosmic Pi-Time  Value, and as you can see nothing stand out there.

FSC * 9,100.43 61 46 20 67 39 70 81 34 90 22 64 6 i.e. 9,100 times FSC to get to  my Cosmic Pi-Time value.

 > = Cosmic Pi-Time... 66.40 90 91 03 40 02 43 72 36 44 03 32 68 87 05

And when subdividing the FSC by Cosmic Pi-Time

/66............ = 0.00 01 10 56 59 47 92 10 17 2
..../66.4 etc...= 0.00 01 09 89 52 26 75 79 48 35 arrived at via Pi^4 minus Pi^3{ XYZ }
FSC..................0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35 75 15 76 12 44 25 34
Pi^3.00003 = 31.00 73 41 51 29 30 84 72 01 62 13 75 71 41 2
Yes, this looking for patterns in the irrational side is not the most sophisticated methodology, yet, I imagine various physicists have done some of this to find some connection to the FSC value, in other ways.

At best, with the Cosmic Pi-Time subdivision of FSC resultant, we see this triplet like occurrence,

.../66.4 etc...= 0.00 01 09 89 52 26 75 79 48 35 arrived at via Pi^4 minus Pi^3{ XYZ }

...............................................9 89....2 2.....75 7................

FSC....................0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35 75 15 76 12 44 25 34

....................................................5 25....78 7............5 75................2.44.2.....

 
.." The fine-structure constant, by contrast, has no dimensionsor units. It’s a pure number that shapes theuniverse to an astonishing degree — “a magic number that comes to us with no understanding,” as Richard Feynmandescribed it. Paul Dirac considered the origin of the number “themost fundamental unsolved problem ofphysics.”....

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 364
Posts: 11,085
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@ebuc
You should be a teacher at school.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,095
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@Best.Korea
You should be a teacher at school.

I dont think so.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,095
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
FSC =  .............0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35 75 15 76 12 44 25 34
Pi^3.00003 = 31.00 73 41 51 29 30 84 72 01 62 13 75 71 41 2

It just occurred to me that Pi^3.0003 is trinary in three ways:

3
.000
........3

And that is total of 6 digits used in power of Pi, to approximate FSC.

Cosmic Trinary Set/Outline

1} Meta-space,

2} macor-infinite truly non-occupied space,

3} finite occupied space Universe,

.......3a} observed { quantised } fermions and bosons of reality,

......3b} ultra-micro Gravity (  )  ---mass-attractive contractive----,

........3c} ultra-micro Dark Energy )(  ---expansive dispersive----.



ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,095
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Oops my errror being corrected here.

FSC =  .............0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35 75 15 76 12 44 25 34
Pi^3.00003 = 31.00 73 41 51 29 30 84 72 01 62 13 75 71 41 2

It just occurred to me that Pi^3.0003 is trinary in two ways:

3
.0000
........3

That is 6 digits.

Also beginning to wonder if the whole rational 31 could be of significance as the number of Space-tiem Horn Tori involved depending energy shell levels of the atom, and/or energy values of other charged particles that interact with the EMRadiation { photon }.  muon electron and tau electron, and other charged particles.

Need to find the links to help understand these others degree of interaction.

" It is the "coupling constant" or measure of the strength of the electromagnetic force that governs how electrically charged elementary particles (e.g.,electron, muon) and light (photons) interact."..

13 days later

ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,095
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
I present the common value digits in bold via various methodologies _ inlcudes Bucky Fullers conclusions } to arrive at or near the actual FSC value

FSC { refined accuracy in Paris } =.........0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35

Pi { shortened } 3.141591^3.00003 =....31.00 72 92 54 99 542548225..<<< this is closet  alternative way to arrive at amost FSC

Pi^3.00003 =..........................................31.00 73 41 51 29 30 84 72 01 62 1375714128..<<<2nd closet way

rhombic triacontahedron volume........0.00 77 58 031........3rd closet way

linear growth of Synergetics Prime Vector....0.00 05 is  the differrence between volume

 ..." The volumetric difference between the T Module and the E Module is the difference between energy-as-matter and energy-as-radiation. The linear growth of 0.0005 transforms the basic energy-conserving quanta module (the physicists' particle) from matter into one minimum-limit "photon" of radiant energy as light or any other radiation (the physicists' wave). ".....

The 5-fold icosahedron has 10, 3D great tori, ---my bosonic photon resultant---  and if we base the following on 18/0 Space-time tori, then we have 10 * 6 invaginations = 60 invaginations ergo, we subdivide FSC value by 60.

FSC 0.00 72 97 35 25 62 78 71 35 / 10 = > i.e. sum collective set of 60 invaginations = FSC

> 0.00 01 21 62 25 4271311892 * 60 = FSC

Throwing this in as coincidence, tho not of close enough to be significant

.." This means that each E QuantaModule is 1.00 15 51 606 whenthe A Quanta Module is 1.0000. "..

and again Fullers conclusion.." ratio of the edgelengths of the two squares is as 1 is to 0.0005, or0.0005 of prime vector radius of ourspherical transformation. This minuscule modelable differenceis the difference between itis and it isn't__which is to say that the dimensional difference between matter andradiation is probably the most minute of all nature'sdimensioning: it is the differencebetween inside-out and outside-out of positive and negativeUniverse. "..

So it appears that Fullers FSC { my presumption based on the above }  is smaller than actual FSC by this much

0.00 67 97 35 25 6278713575.....H,mmmm

I need to add more clarity to this above later. Part of this clarifying is my above mentioning of the a volume value 0.007758031 --that is coincidentally also and only relatively  close to FSC.

986.543  The exact prime-vectorradius 1.0000 (alpha) rhombictriacontahedron volume is 0.007758031 (1/129th) greaterthan the tetravolume 5__i.e.,tetravolume 5.007758031.