How to use AI for trolling (Easiest way possible that works and can be used to troll YouTube)

Author: Best.Korea

Posts

Total: 11
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
At first thought, one might think:

"I will just tell AI to write counter argument for this argument".

However, that faces 2 problems:
1. AI often uses obviously false or even irrelevant information when arguing. It often sounds horrible, and has horrible rhetoric that becomes boring to read, and even fails to address points.
2. AI in this way is detected by AI detect tools.

However, there is a more simple way, one which works much better and much easier, and cannot be detected by AI detect tools.

Simply give AI this command:

"Write a negation of text "insert text here""

Instead of writing counter arguments, AI will just copy text you give it but in opposite way, basically saying opposite of each sentence in text.

So if you are arguing with a person on YouTube, just copy what they say and tell AI to write negation of it. It works with any argument, but for improved negation, make sure to add logical connections to text in case person didnt use them.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
If someone wants to provide any argument, I can demonstrate how AI writes opposite of it. But keep it logical and polite (AI refuses to deal with sensitive topics, sensitive politics and political persons, obviously).
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
Try this.

When the second law was formulated, it was about heat, it is the second law of “thermodynamics”, it was a law about energy, not matter, so it could ignore matter. It told us about how heat energy acts in a closed system. There was energy and matter, function and form, and the second law being about the function half of the system, it could disregard form.   The second law didn’t need to take into account the observed fact that natural form building activities are occurring over time, that just wasn’t what it was about.

Self-integrated units of matter are in fact observed opposing the predicted statistical trend toward randomness. Manmade systems impose shape and order from outside, and they break down, entropy applies there. But there are naturally forming units of matter, the hydrogen atom, ice crystals, protein molecules, and the biggie, life, are units whose form is organized within. They all show a tendency to protect themselves from dissolution and repair themselves from within when they have been disturbed or damaged. We need not think of it as imposed from outside by the way, but we are observing a universe in which entities of matter are increasing form and complexity in space and time, and they are defying the second law.


Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Sidewalker
When the second law was formulated, it was not about heat, it is not the second law of “thermodynamics”, it was not a law about energy, but matter, so it could not ignore matter. It did not tell us about how heat energy acts in a closed system. There was not energy and matter, function and form, and the second law not being about the function half of the system, it could not disregard form.   The second law needed to take into account the observed fact that natural form building activities are not occurring over time, that was exactly what it was about.
Self-integrated units of matter are in fact not observed opposing the predicted statistical trend toward randomness. Manmade systems do not impose shape and order from outside, and they do not break down, entropy does not apply there. But there are not naturally forming units of matter, the hydrogen atom, ice crystals, protein molecules, and the biggie, life, are not units whose form is organized within. They all do not show a tendency to protect themselves from dissolution and repair themselves from within when they have been disturbed or damaged. We need not think of it as imposed from outside by the way, but we are not observing a universe in which entities of matter are increasing form and complexity in space and time, and they are not defying the second law.

Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Best.Korea
Boring, like the Monty Python "Argument Clinic", but not funny.  I don't think you need AI to change is to isn't and does to doesn't.




Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Sidewalker
I don't think you need AI to change is to isn't and does to doesn't.
I dont, but AI does it in seconds. Much faster.

Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Best.Korea
I dont, but AI does it in seconds. Much faster.
I do, but AI doesn't do it in seconds.  Much slower
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Sidewalker
See! Fun!
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,260
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@Best.Korea
I saw the title and fully expected GP to be the OP
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,638
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Double_R
I think GP is russian AI.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 1,999
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@Double_R
I didn't see the title and didn't fully expect GP to be the OP.