Are you dumber than average or smarter than the next one that comments.

Author: Mall
Politics
Ethics
Who wants to be a millionaire

Posts

Total: 26
Topic's author
#1
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 398
Posts: 1,937
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
Your rationale to believe a scientist over a minister.

Your reasoning for believing a woman as a victim than a man .

Your bias to a "non white" stealing, committing crimes over a "white".

Your bias to a democrat over a republican .

Your hatred towards one and not another.

Your love towards one and not another.

You believing what I say versus another with a academic prestigious title that has written something.

Please explain your rationale through all of these points, your thought process, etc.

#2
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Mall
Your rationale to believe a scientist over a minister
   Scientists use observable facts
and create observable proven general premises, and support what many debates are based on.

   The only valid form of logic is deduction,
which creates specific conclusion from general premise obtained through logic, observation.

   Without scientists, you would have no
many of the general premises which you use in debate, destroying many debates.
#3
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,775
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Mall

Your rationale to believe a scientist over a minister.
Let me see, do I believe Rev. Jim Bakker or Albert Einstein? I'm going with Einstein.
#4
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@FLRW
I'm going with Einstein
Smart people are much more likely to bring good decisions and even more likely to be good people.

#5
Moozer325
Moozer325's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 1,191
3
2
8
Moozer325's avatar
Moozer325
3
2
8
-->
@Best.Korea
No offense, but you are a walking contradiction to that sentence.
#6
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,785
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@Mall
Your rationale to believe a scientist over a minister.
No need, they speak of different things, non-overlapping magisteria so to speak.
Topic's author
#7
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 398
Posts: 1,937
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Best.Korea
Is there anything that a scientist has tested, researched, experimented and observed that you haven't?
Topic's author
#8
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 398
Posts: 1,937
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@FLRW
Why?
#9
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Mall
Is there anything that a scientist has tested, researched, experimented and observed that you haven't?
Yes, there are plenty of things scientist tested, researched... that I havent. Its obvious. I cant be everywhere.
Topic's author
#10
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 398
Posts: 1,937
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Best.Korea
Those things you haven't empirically verified for yourself, do believe and trust the scientists findings ?
#11
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Mall
Those things you haven't empirically verified for yourself, do believe and trust the scientists findings ?
Yes, mostly. Although when I debate, I prefer when all sources agree, even tho its rare. Majority rules.

Topic's author
#12
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 398
Posts: 1,937
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Best.Korea
Why mostly and not completely?
#13
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Mall
Not all research agrees with each other. Scientists take specific cases to make general conclusions. Mistakes can happen.

It happens that general conclusion of one scientist contradicts general conclusion of the other, due to error or difference.

Its common in statistics. Smoking usually shortens life by 10 years, but different groups can have different results.
Topic's author
#14
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 398
Posts: 1,937
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Best.Korea
Why do you believe scientists without empirically investigating for yourself?
#15
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Mall
Why do you believe scientists without empirically investigating for yourself?
Because I cant empirically investigate many things. Its not even possible. Many people are necessary to gather statistics.
#16
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,775
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Mall
Why do you believe scientists without empirically investigating for yourself?
I see what you are saying. Please send me $500 million so I can build my own  Large Hadron Collider  so I can check the results.
I will hire B.K to work with me.

Topic's author
#17
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 398
Posts: 1,937
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Best.Korea
So you can't see something for yourself so you just rely on a scientist that has done it for his or herself.
Topic's author
#18
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 398
Posts: 1,937
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@FLRW
Alright, let me borrow a million and I can do that.
#19
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Mall
So you can't see something for yourself so you just rely on a scientist that has done it for his or herself.
Yes.

Topic's author
#20
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 398
Posts: 1,937
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Best.Korea
Does the person have to have the title scientist or can it be anybody that has testified or can testify of it?
#21
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Mall
It can be anyone who makes public statistics, yes. Thats the only way for me to actually have statistics.
Topic's author
#22
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 398
Posts: 1,937
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Best.Korea
Ok so when I make statistics, just believe me. I don't want any hypocritical reaction from you.
#23
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,785
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@FLRW
Why do you believe scientists without empirically investigating for yourself?
I see what you are saying. Please send me $500 million so I can build my own  Large Hadron Collider  so I can check the results.
I will hire B.K to work with me.
That would only get you about 10% of the LHC.
#24
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Mall
Ok so when I make statistics, just believe me. I don't want any hypocritical reaction from you.
They have to be public statistics, you know? As in, seen and examined by lots of people... so?

Topic's author
#25
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 398
Posts: 1,937
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@Best.Korea
Yes just believe me, all of us that have seen things for ourselves. Our eyes has yours at best interest at heart. Nevermind yours, just mines, ours, whatever.
#26
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,171
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Mall
One is never as smart as a Jehovah's Witness.