These are reasons why Kamala needs to win and Trump needs to lose 2024 elections, 3 main points

Author: Best.Korea

Posts

Total: 91
Topic's author
#1
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,649
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
If I needed to think 3 reasons why Kamala needs to win, these would be the three reasons for:

1. Abortion

Abortion reduces crime rates, improves quality of life, reduces prison population, increases equality, increases liberty, increases body rights.

2. Migrants

Migrants have lower crime rate than general population. Migrants reduce crime rate, increase workforce, help low birth rates.

3. Reducing debt

Reducing debt is crucial to save economy and reduce inflation, and to reduce poverty, and solve trade deficit.

The argument is very simple. Kamala would support abortion, increase number of migrants and reduce debt compared to Trump.

Debt, crime, workforce, liberty, equality, body rights, inflation, poverty, life quality - these are most important values for people.

Kamala wins on all these values through the 3 arguments presented. So by logic, Kamala should be next president.
#2
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Best.Korea
 Russia again favors Republican Donald Trump as its preferred candidate to win the US presidential election this year, a US intelligence official has said. “We have not observed a shift in Russia’s preferences for the presidential race from past elections, given the role the US is playing with regard to Ukraine and broader policy toward Russia,” the official from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) said in July.
Previous assessments found that Moscow had tried to help Trump win in 2016 against Hillary Clinton and in the 2020 campaign which he lost to current US President Joe Biden.

#3
Swagnarok
Swagnarok's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 1,250
3
2
6
Swagnarok's avatar
Swagnarok
3
2
6
-->
@Best.Korea
Abortion reduces crime rates
So does killing anyone from a poor socioeconomic background who's statistically more likely to commit crimes. Oh wait, it's almost like the act of killing them is murder, so you didn't actually reduce crime. Hmm...

improves quality of life
So...kill anyone who happened to have been born into American poverty, which is comfy by the standards of much of the world?

increases equality
I guess if you killed all the poor people, there would be less inequality. No need to make even the tiniest personal sacrifice to help tackle this tough problem, such as giving a few dollars to charity every now and then, when you can just blow out the brains of anyone less fortunate than you. Is this what you're saying?

increases liberty
Not sure how this one flies, when it's a crime punishable by death to have been born poor.

Migrants have lower crime rate than general population
This may be true of legal immigrants, since these tend to be vetted and ambitious people who want to actually better their own lives instead of squandering their potential by pointing a gun at someone and going to prison for 10 years. Illegal immigrants are unvetted and we don't know what their criminal histories are. They lack the patience and basic life skills to fill out a form and wait their turn in line. If they're from Mexico, all they have to do is hop into a car and drive 50 miles north, and this is easy enough for any random Jose to do.

The average person of Mexico is the product of a less civilized culture than the United States. In fact, this is true for all of Latin America. If the average person from any one of these countries wants to come here, they must first agree to assimilate into the culture of the land they're arriving in. But the mere act of entering a space does not imply you've made this commitment. The illegal immigrant's behavior is largely unmonitored, they signed no pledge of allegiance before crossing, and so on. For all intents and purposes, they live as though their new home is but an incidentally richer Mexico or Guatemala, unaware that the kind of behavior which is normative in Mexico and Guatemala is the main reason why these places are still poor.

Reducing debt is crucial to save economy and reduce inflation, and to reduce poverty, and solve trade deficit.
True, but VP Harris wants to hike entitlement spending. This is the opposite of lowering the debt.

Topic's author
#4
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,649
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Swagnarok
So does killing anyone from a poor socioeconomic
Unborn arent equal to born people. Killing poor people would cause even more violence and wouldnt increase liberty.


kill anyone who happened to have been born into American poverty
That wouldnt increase the quality of life for anyone. In fact, it would lower the comfort in society for most.

I guess if you killed all the poor people, there would be less inequality
Quite the opposite. That would be unequal treatment of people who are same in value to all other people.

Maybe you want to imply "unborn = poor", but fetus feeds upon woman's body and causes her more pain.

To raise a child costs hundreds of thousands of dollars, which is a waste if child will have horrible life.

The goal is to produce people who will have high quality life, which is better than low quality life.

Anyone who wants to bring more people who will suffer into existence doesnt know about priorities in life.

You cant rape a woman to produce more humans. Fetus cannot non-consensually use woman's body to produce more life.

It is better to live 100 years as free and happy than 10000 years burning alive in fire.

This proves that all life isnt equal. One quality life is better than 100 lives lived in pain.

Fetuses have low survival rate, and unwanted fetuses are much more likely to be abused and be criminals.

But even if abortion was morally wrong, banning abortion doesnt stop most abortions, making it pointless and harmful.
Topic's author
#5
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,649
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Swagnarok
This may be true of legal immigrants
It is true for undocumented migrants. Trump wants to reduce number of legal migrants as well, so harmful.


True, but VP Harris wants
Trump wants to lower taxes. He already increased budget deficit and debt doing exactly that in 2019, 2020.
#6
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Best.Korea

Remember that Trump is Putin's plan to destroy the USA. Then he will let Trump go ahead and build the Moscow Trump Tower.
#7
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,552
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@FLRW
On February 21, 2020, The Washington Post reported that, according to unnamed US officials, Russia was interfering in the Democratic primary in an effort to support the nomination of Senator Bernie Sanders. 

… In March 2020, the University of Wisconsin–Madison and the Brennan Center for Justice published a report indicating that Russia-linked social media accounts have been spreading Instagram posts calculated to sow division among American voters.[54][55] According to the report, Russian operatives were increasingly impersonating real political candidates and groups rather than creating fictional groups.[55]According to Twitter's head of site integrity, Russian agents also attempted in 2018 to create the impression of more election interference than is actually happening to undermine confidence in the process.[56] Shortly thereafter, the New York Timesreported that according to American intelligence officials Russian operatives have been stoking via private Facebook groups anger among African Americans, emphasizing allegations of police brutality in the United States, highlighting racism in the United States against African Americans, and promoting and pressuring hate groups, including white and black extremist groups, in order to create strife within American society,



It appears that Russia’s goal is to sow dischord and doubt in the democratic process and our society. The election of Trump is just one of several possible ways to accomplish this.
#8
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,989
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@cristo71
Yes. Another way is to install Kamala without a single primary vote.
#9
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,552
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Greyparrot
The US political landscape is just chaotic in general currently. I think Putin will be content either way. In regards to Trump, I think the reaction to Trump bears at least as much responsibility for discord as Trump himself. It’s like trying to kill a mouse in your house with a shotgun.
#10
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@Swagnarok
Abortion
Mind You’re Own Damn Business 
Topic's author
#11
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,649
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@cristo71
Russia was interfering in the Democratic primary in an effort to support the nomination of Senator Bernie Sanders. 
Thats a smart move by Russia. Bernie would stand no chance against Trump. It would be basically controlled opposition.

#12
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@cristo71

I see what you are saying. Trump does have the brain of a mouse.
#13
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,552
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Best.Korea
Bernie would stand no chance against Trump.
This claim does not resonate. Trump is likely the most beatable presidential candidate the GOP has, which is precisely why Harris can beat him.

#14
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,552
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@FLRW
I see what you are saying.
Communication is occurring!

Topic's author
#15
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,649
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@cristo71
which is precisely why Harris can beat him.
Harris can. Thats why Russia wanted Bernie instead to be democratic candidate. Thats what your link says, anyway.
#16
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

OMG, Gp is going to say I have MDS.
#17
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,552
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Best.Korea
Thats what your link says, anyway.
Can you quote from the link the part which supports your assertion “Bernie would stand no chance against Trump.”?

Topic's author
#18
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,649
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@cristo71
Can you quote from the link the part which supports your assertion “Bernie would stand no chance against Trump.”?
Kamala has 3% lead in most polls. Due to being old and socialist, Bernie would have less lead.
#19
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@cristo71

You are a pilot too, right?
#20
Swagnarok
Swagnarok's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 1,250
3
2
6
Swagnarok's avatar
Swagnarok
3
2
6
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Every southern plantation owner in the 1800s would've said the same.
#21
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,552
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Best.Korea
Bernie would have less lead.
Less lead? You claimed he would be decidedly trailing.

#22
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,552
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@FLRW
Yes. Why do you ask?
Topic's author
#23
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,649
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@cristo71
Less lead? You claimed he would be decidedly trailing
Less lead actually means a loss in US elections, because electoral votes favor republicans for some reason, not democrats.

For example, Hillary won 2% more votes than Trump, but lost elections anyway. So lead doesnt mean victory.
#24
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@cristo71

Because I thought me and IWRA were the only pilots on the site then I saw how smart you were and that you had propics of airliners.
#25
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,552
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@Best.Korea
Good save!
#26
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,552
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
-->
@FLRW
The Captain thinks that having a plane pic makes me a wannabe. It’s a good thing reality and I don’t care what he thinks!
Topic's author
#27
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,649
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@cristo71
Good save!
Thanks. I practice.

#28
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,989
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@cristo71
Pretty much this. If half of America truly thinks the Pinnacle of pushing back on Putin is to cripple our own energy reserves while allowing Putin to take and hold a significant chunk of the old USSR, Putin already won the mind war.
Topic's author
#29
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,649
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Greyparrot
while allowing Putin to take and hold a significant chunk of the old USSR
So we should send many weapons to Ukraine so Ukraine takes some of Russia like it did recently?

#30
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 1,999
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@Best.Korea
Abortion reduces crime rates
I concede that making abortion legal would reduce crime rates, but have you considered making all crimes legal? Anything above a crime rate of zero is too high.