Trump Threatens To Use Nuclear Weapons

Author: FLRW

Posts

Total: 19
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
In the latest sign of his fascination with using nuclear weapons, former U.S. President Donald Trump told a crowd in January that one of the reasons he needed immunity was so that he couldn’t be indicted for using nuclear weapons on a city, like former President Harry Truman did to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,992
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
This misinformation and disinformation about what people say is why we can't have nuclear power and instead have to rely on unsustainable Chinese energy.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Greyparrot

Iran must be worried. OMG, is that why they hacked the Trump Campaign?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,992
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@FLRW
Yeah, Iran is really worried USA can't have nuclear energy solely due to the fact of Orangemanbad vibes.

During the interview with Elon Musk on X, Donald Trump touched on the importance of nuclear energy, specifically in the context of powering the future of AI. Trump suggested that as AI technology advances and becomes more integrated into various aspects of society, there will be an increasing need for reliable and substantial energy sources. He indicated that nuclear energy must play a critical role in meeting the growing energy demands driven by AI, ensuring that the U.S. remains competitive in the global technological landscape.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,992
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@FLRW
The "Orangemanbad" narrative, which portrays Donald Trump as a reckless figure potentially capable of launching nuclear weapons without restraint, can significantly impact public perception of nuclear energy. This kind of portrayal heightens fears around anything associated with "nuclear," even though nuclear energy is a peaceful and essential technology for powering the future. When the public conflates nuclear energy with nuclear weapons due to such narratives, it becomes more challenging to build support for expanding nuclear power, which is vital for meeting the growing energy demands, particularly in the context of AI advancements.

Moreover, this narrative can influence policy decisions. If policymakers are swayed by exaggerated fears that Trump or any leader might misuse nuclear technology, they may impose stricter regulations on nuclear energy development. This could slow down the adoption of nuclear energy at a time when it is critically needed to ensure energy security and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. The implications extend beyond just energy policy; they affect national security and the U.S.'s ability to remain competitive globally in technological innovations.

Finally, the focus on sensationalized claims about Trump’s potential misuse of nuclear weapons distracts from the real discussions needed to advance nuclear energy. The energy debate should center around the benefits of nuclear power as a clean, reliable energy source and the challenges of safely managing and expanding its use. When the discourse is overshadowed by fear-mongering narratives, it detracts from the critical work of ensuring a sustainable energy future powered by technologies like AI, which will require significant and reliable energy sources that nuclear power can provide.

FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Greyparrot

You think Trump never lies, right?
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 10,673
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
BASED trump
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Greyparrot

How much TrumpCoin (DJT) do you own?
sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,171
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
People drinking the media Kool-aide by the gallons.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
People drinking the media Kool-aide by the gallons.
Right, hearing Trump’s own words coming out of his mouth is media Koolaid.

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,649
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@FLRW
one of the reasons he needed immunity was so that he couldn’t be indicted for using nuclear weapons on a city
Trump is like Jesus if Jesus was a greedy billionare psychopath.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,992
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@FLRW
From your source: 

Trump's alleged comments, reported for the first time in a new afterword to a book by New York Times Washington correspondent Michael Schmidt....

No wonder there is no record of Trump ever saying this. Thanks for spreading the CIA disinformation though. Again.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Greyparrot
This is my source:
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,992
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@FLRW
I know. They had a link to hearsay in that article (which I linked for you) and claimed Trump said it. He didn't say he had a "fascination" with using nuclear weapons. There's no record of him saying it.

Thanks again for spreading CIA disinformation.
sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,171
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I wouldn't want a president that wouldn't threaten to use nuclear weapons. That President would be a simp ass boot licking paper tiger. My only issue with Trump saying this is  does he mean it and would he use them . Drawing lines in the sand and not backing the threat is worse than saying the nuclear threat isn't even an option.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,992
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@sadolite
Maybe that's why Russia rolled into the Donbas in 2022, because Biden was afraid he would go to jail if he threatened Russia.
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,597
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
-->
@sadolite
I wouldn't want a president that wouldn't threaten to use nuclear weapons.
How about a President who would recklessly threaten to use nuclear weapons?

sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,171
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
No I would not like that anymore than  a President that would declare to the whole world that nuclear weapons would never be an option in the defense of our nation, interests or  allies. I don't see any proof of either Presidential candidate using them recklessly but rather one that might use them if justified and the other  not at all to preserve appearances regardless of any losses of any innocent  human life or allied interests