In the latest sign of his fascination with using nuclear weapons, former U.S. President Donald Trump told a crowd in January that one of the reasons he needed immunity was so that he couldn’t be indicted for using nuclear weapons on a city, like former President Harry Truman did to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Trump Threatens To Use Nuclear Weapons
Posts
Total:
19
This misinformation and disinformation about what people say is why we can't have nuclear power and instead have to rely on unsustainable Chinese energy.
-->
@Greyparrot
Iran must be worried. OMG, is that why they hacked the Trump Campaign?
-->
@FLRW
Yeah, Iran is really worried USA can't have nuclear energy solely due to the fact of Orangemanbad vibes.
During the interview with Elon Musk on X, Donald Trump touched on the importance of nuclear energy, specifically in the context of powering the future of AI. Trump suggested that as AI technology advances and becomes more integrated into various aspects of society, there will be an increasing need for reliable and substantial energy sources. He indicated that nuclear energy must play a critical role in meeting the growing energy demands driven by AI, ensuring that the U.S. remains competitive in the global technological landscape.
-->
@FLRW
The "Orangemanbad" narrative, which portrays Donald Trump as a reckless figure potentially capable of launching nuclear weapons without restraint, can significantly impact public perception of nuclear energy. This kind of portrayal heightens fears around anything associated with "nuclear," even though nuclear energy is a peaceful and essential technology for powering the future. When the public conflates nuclear energy with nuclear weapons due to such narratives, it becomes more challenging to build support for expanding nuclear power, which is vital for meeting the growing energy demands, particularly in the context of AI advancements.
Moreover, this narrative can influence policy decisions. If policymakers are swayed by exaggerated fears that Trump or any leader might misuse nuclear technology, they may impose stricter regulations on nuclear energy development. This could slow down the adoption of nuclear energy at a time when it is critically needed to ensure energy security and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. The implications extend beyond just energy policy; they affect national security and the U.S.'s ability to remain competitive globally in technological innovations.
Finally, the focus on sensationalized claims about Trump’s potential misuse of nuclear weapons distracts from the real discussions needed to advance nuclear energy. The energy debate should center around the benefits of nuclear power as a clean, reliable energy source and the challenges of safely managing and expanding its use. When the discourse is overshadowed by fear-mongering narratives, it detracts from the critical work of ensuring a sustainable energy future powered by technologies like AI, which will require significant and reliable energy sources that nuclear power can provide.
-->
@Greyparrot
You think Trump never lies, right?
BASED trump
-->
@Greyparrot
How much TrumpCoin (DJT) do you own?
People drinking the media Kool-aide by the gallons.
People drinking the media Kool-aide by the gallons.
Right, hearing Trump’s own words coming out of his mouth is media Koolaid.
-->
@FLRW
one of the reasons he needed immunity was so that he couldn’t be indicted for using nuclear weapons on a city
Trump is like Jesus if Jesus was a greedy billionare psychopath.
-->
@FLRW
From your source:
Trump's alleged comments, reported for the first time in a new afterword to a book by New York Times Washington correspondent Michael Schmidt....
No wonder there is no record of Trump ever saying this. Thanks for spreading the CIA disinformation though. Again.
-->
@Greyparrot
-->
@FLRW
I know. They had a link to hearsay in that article (which I linked for you) and claimed Trump said it. He didn't say he had a "fascination" with using nuclear weapons. There's no record of him saying it.
Thanks again for spreading CIA disinformation.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I wouldn't want a president that wouldn't threaten to use nuclear weapons. That President would be a simp ass boot licking paper tiger. My only issue with Trump saying this is does he mean it and would he use them . Drawing lines in the sand and not backing the threat is worse than saying the nuclear threat isn't even an option.
-->
@sadolite
Maybe that's why Russia rolled into the Donbas in 2022, because Biden was afraid he would go to jail if he threatened Russia.
-->
@sadolite
I wouldn't want a president that wouldn't threaten to use nuclear weapons.
How about a President who would recklessly threaten to use nuclear weapons?
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
No I would not like that anymore than a President that would declare to the whole world that nuclear weapons would never be an option in the defense of our nation, interests or allies. I don't see any proof of either Presidential candidate using them recklessly but rather one that might use them if justified and the other not at all to preserve appearances regardless of any losses of any innocent human life or allied interests