That is not what transpired.Sam states "analgesic is not this specific facebook profile" in response you state something like "since you have narrowed down the list of 6,000,000,000 possible people to 5,999,999,999, you have doxxed her and shall be banned".
Wylted's thread is buzzing lol. Although I'll be unbanned in 2 days ish, I figured I'd just post this here as I can't respond to it there: "Sam was banned for providing specific details about another user which indicated that (a) Sam had doxxed the other user" I never doxxed Zarro, I do not have their information. The post that I got banned for making analyzed the differences between what Zarro said about themselves over the years and what the person, Rachel, was all about and how they did not match up. "Sam suggested that he wanted his information to be used by others to dox the user in question." I wanted them to use the information I provided to look into it and come to the same conclusion that I came to, that Zarro is not who they say they are. As to what others do with the information, I can not control."When offered the chance to defend himself, Sam chose not to contest the facts of what he did" Bsh characterized it as doxxing off the bat even though it clearly wasn't the case. He provided his argument and used very poor analogy to explain my actions and why a ban would be given. I proved his analogy wrong and provided the correct course of action that a mod would want to take if they wanted to preserve the site user base, keep drama at low levels, etc. I also said why the AMA created the perfect venue to pursue questions related to Zarro and questions concerning who she says she is; after all, 'she' specifically said she'd answer any and all questions. An example would be Neil Degrasse Tyson opening himself up to a Q&A session from the public, getting asked questions regarding his recent sexual assault allegations, and Tyson/the security at the venue dismissing and removing people from the audience who press the issue and want some answers. Don't open yourself up to "any and all" questions and get mad when people press the issue that you've been dismissive or reluctant to talk about. In Zarro's case, she said that the first questions asked in her AMA concerning her backstory were retarded even though, as we've come to find out, they are not. It is what it is... if someone wants to C/P this in the thread, feel free. Is Wylted on discord(?), if not show him this or ask him to join another hangout sometime.I wish I could jump into wylted's thread now but I have to wait 3 whole days >.>
I understand. Thanks for answering the personal questions."That's cool. Do you find that you gravitate more to people who have been banned or sanctioned by an authority?"I do, but that is not why in this situation. I can't disclose why without revealing personal information disclosed to me.
You block for no reason and the @ them. The reason for blocking them is so you don't interact with them in any way shape or form. Your just an instigator cry baby. This is the truth. rEaL g ShIt
I don't respect people on the internet who have no authority and doxx people for fun. Especially on this website.You can look in your stupid fucking mirror, and call yourself a GOD/KING of this site. Good for you buddy. I can speak on behalf of DART, we do not care you have 54 debates and have won by practically noob sniping Type1. But good job, good job. How much do you get paid to be #1 on the site?
Your the crybaby.
852 days later
15 days later
