Quantum Pulse = 14 nodal events { 0 - 13p } ergo, 3 triangles = 9 nodal events and the quantum pulse must always be taken within context of the 18/0 Quantum Space-time Torus wherein, the 18 and 0 ---conceptual circle that defines inside Observed Time line 0....>....18 wherein, 18 and 0 meet to share same location ergo, the 18/0 in the four line pattern.
With the four line pattern approach, Ive presumed a sequential spiral surface trajectory, that includes two ever so slightly spiral invaginations { in and out }. So the question becomes , can we explain this pulse idea with three triangles ---ergo, outer set of nodal events /\ --- and,
one or more nodal events inside each of the triangular events, or between the triangular events? Now that is the real quandary for me to tackle. Is it possible if the nodal events are occurring in sequence?
.........1.................5p.....7p...............11p......13p....Gravity( ).....( ).......( )
-
18/0...........................6...........................12..........Observed Time /\/\/\/ or as v^v^v^
.................3p.........................9............................Observed Time \/\/\/ or as ^v^v^v
-
...........2p........4..................8.....10.......................Dark Energy )(......)(..........)(
18/0....1...2p is first triangular set. 3p would be the natural presumptive candidate of relative consideration to the prior triangular /\ set of nodal events.
First of all, we have to grasp the idea that, the triangle is not a closed triangle, as we presume a triangle to be, when drawn on any medium. Ex our pixelated screen......../\.........the triangle is defined by a spiral trajectory, with context of 14 nodal event quantum pulse and the greater Quantum Space-time Horn Torus.
4...5p....6 with 7p being the presumptive candidate of relative consideration to the prior triangular set.
8....9...10 with 11p being the presumptive candidate of relative consideration to the prior triangular set.
12...13p being the presumptive candidates of relative consideration to the prior triangular set.
If we take the above sequence at face value --as presented--- then, the following set:
3p { Ob-Time }....7p { Gravity }.....11p { Gravity } ......12 { Ob-Time } and 13p { Gravity }
are to be somehow to be considered by me, as the nuclear set relative to the the three triangles, that, I would like to the think of as --or once did before discovering this four line pattern--- follows:
contracting triangle on one end that then pushes along the of 4th { nuclear? } nodal event forward >>>>
>>>causing the expansion of triangle in middle{ mid-girth }, that, and the next 4th nodal event is pushed forward >>>>
to cause the next contracted triangle to expand, and that leaves the next set of two nodal events 12..13p to push forward and cause expansion of the next triangle.
So we then have to follow this sequence around this numerically defined spiraling trajectory defined torus. We may see that that the above numerical set does not occur on as we go around the torus.
….1........…..5p...7p.........11p....13p.............17p..........1.................5p.......................................
-
18/0..................6....................12.........................18/0..............................................................
.......….3p.............…..9.........................15...............................3p..................................................
-
...…..2p....4.......…...8...10.................14....16....................2p........4................................................
14.....15...16 with 17p being pushed forward
18/0.........1......2p and 3p being pushed forward.
Ok, so the same sequence appears if go with my above presentation. The question in my mind is, should the 12 and 13p be considered as part of initiating new triangular set,---12...13p...14 or maybe even just 13p being the initiation of a new triangular set....13p....14...15.
12....13p......14 with 15 being pushed forward
16....17p 18/0 with 1 being pushed forward, changes the numerically defined dynamics of where the pulse is occurring on each go around the torus.
So start with 13p, instead of the 12 and the numerically defined dynamics of the pulse sequence is changed.
Something to think about. The human begins somewhere as a fertilized egg and ends with death.
All particles have a pulse, when defined by my interfering and overlapping Quantum Space-time Tori, and all particles are believe to decay and die, however, we dont know the natural decay life-span of a proton { a Fermion }.
..." No low-energy light seems to be missing, indicating that very few photons, if any, have decayed since the big bang some 13.7 billion years ago. This analysis enabled Heeck to calculate that the minimum lifetime of a photon is 1018, or one billion billion, years. "...
