The real reason why democrats win the popular vote - Acceptance

Author: Best.Korea

Posts

Total: 10
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,652
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
I have learned from Kate from anime that acceptance is actually a military strategy far superior to "single minded unity".

Whats it about?

Acceptance increases number of your allies naturally, by reducing number of enemies by reducing exclusion and increasing support.

To make it simple, there are many types of people in the world.

If you accept only one type and work against all other types, you will likely have more enemies than allies.

Democrats, by accepting and supporting different types of people such as gays, trans, minorities, oppressed ones, migrants, poor...ect.
have actually greatly increased number of their allies.

If you support all different types of people, then all different types of people will support you.

It is much better to create a system where all different types of people work together, rather than forcing all to be one type.

This is also true for global dominance. You cannot force all other countries to be made of one type of people, but by giving support to all different types, you as a result recieve support from all different types of people around the world.

Democrats have won popular vote twice in a row, because they give support to many types of people, which when it sums up, adds to majority vote.

Most people support abortions, thus democrats by supporting right to abortion, support most people, which in return increases support of most people to democrats.

The simple strategy of acceptance, which dictates that all types of people should be accepted as long as they accept others, is almost like a perfect political law which cannot be countered in any way, as it goes beyond simple "go with what majority wants", but it recognizes that even different parts of society which are in minority individually can reach majority once their numbers are summed up and once they are united.

Thus, by giving each type of person something which that person wants a lot, the support is gathered from all groups in society, and majority vote is secured.

From this point, democrats cannot ever lose a popular vote as long as republicans exclude so many people from their ideology.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Best.Korea
I have learned from Kate from anime...
Well there you have it, Democrats have a better show. Better ratings. People vote for the best stories, even if they know deep down it is all lies.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,611
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Best.Korea

The electoral college is a medieval relic. Only the U.S. still has one.
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@FLRW
In a lot of nations (like Canada and the UK), it's possible for their leader to not win a majority of the vote as well.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,652
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@TheUnderdog
I guess they have rule of minority then.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,171
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@Greyparrot
I have learned from Kate from anime...
Well there you have it, Democrats have a better show. Better ratings. People vote for the best stories, even if they know deep down it is all lies.
Look at you trying to make a Best.Korea thread have deep meaning. Takes guts to try.

Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,993
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
UwU
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,652
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Look at you trying to make a Best.Korea thread have deep meaning. Takes guts to try.
Thanks, the key is in practice.

Swagnarok
Swagnarok's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 1,250
3
2
6
Swagnarok's avatar
Swagnarok
3
2
6
-->
@Best.Korea
The kind of acceptance you're talking about is cheaply rendered, but not in the best interests of people.

Most are not driven just by their own temperament to be a better version of themselves. They require a push forward, and a sense of structure, or else they'll revert to baser modes of living. This isn't good for society, but it's also not good for the individuals in question. An ennobled soul will, in the long term, be a happier one than that of a person who spends his whole life one measly step above an animal.

For the person who is not there and has not experienced it, this fact can be understood on an intellectual level but their bodies will chafe and rage against discipline and self-denial. Hence, it'll always be easy to win an election offering "acceptance".
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,652
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
I have brought peace and stability to my new empire.