That looks like about 77% to me.
It's a near vertical line;
77% is a slope of about 3x higher than the MAGA slope. This is like 30x.
You should try to be more careful before jumping to conclusions.
of course it's a vertical line. They got the results of a lot of mail in ballots all at once. Why would it not be?
I think that is Underdog's point. Why did all the mail in ballots turn out so much for Biden when the graph climbs for both candidates at a consistent level?
There was no "evidence" because they could not get their hands on the ballots.
It does sound fishy to me.
There were tons of recounts all over the country.
It probably sounds fishy to the village idiot too. Why do you think that is?
Why didn't democrats vote for the bill that passed through the house about illegals not able to vote? Hmmm . . Sounds fishy again.
Why didn't democrats vote for the bill that passed through the house about illegals not able to vote?
If you recount bad ballots, then of course you will get the same result.
Why didn't democrats vote for the bill that passed through the house about illegals not able to vote?
HB - Let me get this straight. There is absolutely no evidence of any significant amount of fraud, so you choose to take that as evidence of fraud?
IWRA - Impress me.
I said that the fact that nearly all of the mail ballots went to Biden was suspicious.
Nobody got the chance to investigate it.
All the recounts came out the same, but if the mail in ballots were fake, how can we find it out if we are not allowed to inspect them?
See the circular problem here?
Why is the southern border wide open with MILLIONS of illegals pouring in?
What would be the reason that the current Administration would allow this?
2) both parties to some extent "allow" it because the economy is, in many ways, tied to illegal immigrants. There are entire industries that would collapse without them. Especially in farming and service industries. Not a lot of people want to be cleaning toilets and picking fruit in the scorching heat for very little pay.
Seriously, how do you think they are voting? How would that work?
As for the illegal immigrant voting. Why is the southern border wide open with MILLIONS of illegals pouring in? What would be the reason that the current Administration would allow this? Giving them cash cards, putting them up in hotels, etc.
I am aware of this and am involved with the industry that uses the labor, but the amount has been extraordinary in this administration. Does it justify the amounts that are coming?
I just looked up the voter registration for AZ and all they need is a SSN or even a driver's license.
All they have to do is fill out a voter registration and can vote in federal elections, but not local.
So yes, it is already illegal to have non-US citizens to vote, but I just found a loop hole.
So does every electronic credit check.a VALID SSN. You can't use a fake SSN to register to vote. The government knows which numbers are real.
So does every electronic credit check.That's why you can buy as many valid SSNs as you want.
So does every electronic credit check.That's why you can buy as many valid SSNs as you want.There are other security checks too.
But if you are able to fake enough ID and get past security checks to register to vote fraudulently, then you could do it in person too.
You assume, you have no first hand knowledge.
If you weren't afraid of being caught on camera voting twice. Then again there are "polcies" and laws in many places preventing the recording of voting places.
Left-tribe loves early voting (or are told to).
Yet another example of the left-tribe coincidentally favoring policies that make cheating easier.
You assume, you have no first hand knowledge.the topic has been extensively studied.
All studies agree that voter fraud is very rare.
Here's a link to a list of studies by people who have extensive 1st hand knowledge.
The Brennan Center’s seminal report on this issue
It may seem significantly more suspicious to register twice on the same day but even then, two registrations do not necessarily yield two votes.In 2004, for example
If you weren't afraid of being caught on camera voting twice. Then again there are "polcies" and laws in many places preventing the recording of voting places.ok, so you raise a point, then immediately disprove your own point. Why did bother saying it when you already know it's wrong?
The left wants as many people to vote as possible because the higher the turnout, the less likely the right is to win.
2) Early voting is most heavily used by the elderly. Statistically, the older people get the more right leaning they become. So no, your point is wrong. It has been true in the last few years only because trump keeps lying and telling his followers that early voting can't be trusted.
you haven't shown it makes cheating easier.
So has theology, most theologians agree god exists.
Benefit of the doubt now expired. Moving on.
Even if they did make some kind of compelling case giving an upper limit to the amount of fraud (which they most certainly did not) one could simply argue that the fraud was not highly motivated before the deep state propaganda campaign created derangement syndromes. In simpler terms nobody thought Bush or John Kerry were racist nascent Hitlers that need to be strangled in their crib.
That's enough spot checking. Your false pretense of academic rigor and eye-witness testimony is wearing thin very quickly. In fact it's totally debunked if the first three examples of a supposedly rigorously researched article fail the test.
I didn't disprove anything. In those places where cameras are illegal and poll watchers are marginalized it is still safer and more practical to commit mail fraud.
The common denominator is left-tribers following propaganda and making it easy to commit election fraud in more than one way.
If there were cameras on the polling centers it would be more risky to try and vote twice in person, true or false?
So has theology, most theologians agree god exists.theologians don't "study" anything. They read fictional accounts made up by previous theologians.
Benefit of the doubt now expired. Moving on.There are reasonable reasons why 2 registrations could happen on the same day. Like a clerical error.
So you see them saying something obviously true
you're not really making any sense or disputing anything. You're just looking for paper thin reasons to hand wave away studies.
prove it.
I don't care about your feelings.
If there were cameras on the polling centers it would be more risky to try and vote twice in person, true or false?why would it?
Do you think there are people examining everyone who shows up to vote to make sure they didn't vote twice?
They check ID's
The only reason a camera would do anything is if someone already suspected you were voting twice and reviewed it as evidence later.
But for that to happen, you have to already know the fraud took place.
Consensus in a self-selected group of people combined with their ability to produce extensive dialogue is unrelated to verity.
Of two different clerics in two different states at on the same day out of 365 possible days?
There are reasons, but they are very low probability events. Anyone who doesn't admit this is stupid or deceptive.
Mail is not traceable, faces can be remembered even if they are not recorded. <- wow so hard
If there were cameras on the polling centers it would be more risky to try and vote twice in person, true or false?why would it?A review of the footage could show someone casting a ballot twice in the same election.... <- duhhhhh?
Do you think there are people examining everyone who shows up to vote to make sure they didn't vote twice?rofl, if there aren't I think I found the reason people are concerned.
No, I think it is possible to review records without knowing fraud (or any other crime) took place. They call this an "audit". It's a term 'experts' use which means investigation done to prove there was no crime, deception, or error.
Why did all the mail in ballots turn out so much for Biden when the graph climbs for both candidates at a consistent level? Then all of a sudden, Biden voters came in like a flood with the mail ins?
Consensus in a self-selected group of people combined with their ability to produce extensive dialogue is unrelated to verity.the problem is that you are comparing people who actually study data and look for evidence with people who study a fictional book and talk about it. There is no comparison.
You didn't provide any details beyond the same name being registered twice in the same day.
There are hundreds of millions of people in America. That's alot of people registering to vote on any given day. If there had never been a day where the same name was registered twice, that would be extremely unlikely.
Mail is not traceable, faces can be remembered even if they are not recorded. <- wow so hardmail is tracible.
I don't know why you would think it isn't.
Faces can be remembered, but when you are looking at thousands of faces the odds you would remember or even care if you saw the same one twice is pretty low.
so you assume it is without any evidence to support it.
1) the only way it could matter is if someone already suspected their votes were fraudelent and reviewed the tapes, which is highly unlikely to happen.
2) if they used fake IDs, then you wouldn't know who they are anyway. So it still wouldn't be riskier.
so you don't even know how elections work?
They check to make sure you are the person on the ID.
1) the costs with reviewing video footage of every election site to try to spot this would be HUGE. millions of man hours.
