Killing Hitler as a baby

Author: Savant

Posts

Total: 20
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 2,076
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
When polled on whether they would kill Hitler as a baby, only 42% of NYT readers said yes.

When polled on whether the atomic bombings of Japan were justified, 56% of Americans said yes.

Either people are really uncomfortable with messing up the timeline, or killing 200,000 people to end the war early is considered preferable to killing one person to stop the war entirely.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Why would I kill Hitler?
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Why would I nuke Japan?

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Neither are a threat to my existence.
Moozer325
Moozer325's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 1,191
3
2
8
Moozer325's avatar
Moozer325
3
2
8
-->
@Savant
I think I might keep the first bomb. I would exhaust all other options first though, like I would make absolutely sure that the Japanese knew that we were going to drop it, and that it was real, and give them time to surrender. If they still say no, then it’s dropping the bomb, or launching a ground invasion which both would have killed about the same amount of people. 

The second bomb was a definitely un called for though.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 363
Posts: 11,007
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@Moozer325
I would have just surrendered and let Japan win.
n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,042
3
2
5
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
5
i think it might boil down to whether the ends justify the means. a lot of people stupidly stick to ideology and think the end never justifies the means... they say hitler was at one point just an innocent baby, and that dropping the bomb was a just response to a bad guy. in truth, the moral thing is that we all know hitler was bound to be bad, even if he was innocent at time time. it's like not pushing an innocent person into traffic if it'd save lots of people. it's absolutely immoral not to do what's necessary for the greater good. it's called proportionalism. that's not saying all bad things can be justified, only if it's proportional. i know me being a christian who believes in proportionalism is controversial, but i dont care. there's not clear authoritative teaching on this, so i use the gift of reason that God gave me 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,171
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Savant
Butterfly effect.


Change the course of 20th century events and everything would now be different.


No Debateart, no Savant, no Zed, no poll.


The bomb was perhaps an evolutionary inevitability and going to be deployed at some point, by someone.


Japan recovered OK.


Europe recovered OK.


Shit still happens.


Clever stupid gene.


The Earth continues to rotate.


The Sun still does it's stuff.


And so on........
Swagnarok
Swagnarok's avatar
Debates: 7
Posts: 1,266
3
2
6
Swagnarok's avatar
Swagnarok
3
2
6
Sentiment of the Japanese public was a key driver of the country's aggressive Showa-era foreign policy. It made for a convenient postwar myth that they were dragged into a war they didn't want by men like Hideki Tojo but the fact is that the average citizen was, by and large, guilty.

Baby Hitler, in contrast, was a baby.

This analysis is, of course, flawed in that Japanese babies and children who had nothing to do with the war were killed too. But whatever.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,775
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
You all know that life is meaningless. If you equate the life of the Universe to 100 years, the life of a human is 15 seconds.
The goal in life should be to make as much money and have as much sex as you can!
OMG, I'm a Trump!
Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 5,620
3
6
10
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
3
6
10
-->
@Savant
The nuke question is something I'm still undecided on.

As for killing Hitler as a baby, I wouldn't. While WWII was tragic and took the lives of many, the butterfly effect that resulted created as many, if not more. People were dispersed, and they met new people that were found at their new home. In some cases, a refugee married someone they met in their new home, resulting a new bloodline being created. In other cases, someone had a changed outlook on life after the war, which resulted in that someone marrying a different person than they would have previously. Same concept.

To be honest, I don't think I would exist if WWII never happened. My grandfather was in the Navy during WWII, stationed in the Pacific theater. He never saw battle, but I would be shocked if his experience in the military didn't change him. It certainly impacted his decisions going forward, which likely ensured he would meet and eventually marry my grandmother.

I can guarantee I'm not the only one who wouldn't exist if WWII didn't happen. Should I sacrifice myself, many of the people I know, and who knows how many others around the world, for the sake of those whose fate was already decided back then? Absolutely not.

Sure, there'd be many individuals that would exist in place of us all; however, they don't exist, so we have no moral obligation to them. We have the people in this world right now.

And that's not even factoring in the future, where the butterfly effect would get even more intense.
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 2,076
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
-->
@Mharman
According to the multiverse theory of time travel, you'd be creating a new universe where Hitler dies and billions of new lives in that universe, without affecting anybody in this one.
Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 5,620
3
6
10
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
3
6
10
-->
@Savant
I don't believe in any sort of multiverse, but let's entertain the idea for the sake of argument.

It would be completely irrelevant. The original question about killing baby Hitler is about how we would handle things in our own timeline if we could change them.

85 days later

Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 3,432
4
5
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
5
10
-->
@Savant
Couldn't I just steal Hitler as a baby and give him to an orphanage or something?
Do I have to 'kill him?
Different living environment, different person perhaps.

Additionally, maybe removing Hitler is just a bad idea anyway,
Maybe 'situation in Germany, was more the cause for Nazi Germany, than Hitler himself.
Maybe person who replaces Hitler in situation, is more capable leader.

Japan and war with already there,
Saves soldiers and civilian lives 'maybe, to drop nuke,
I don't remember what I've read about the situation before the dropping of the bomb.
Earth
Earth's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 3,105
3
4
8
Earth's avatar
Earth
3
4
8
Can I kill the guy that denied Hitler's entrance to art school?
Lemming
Lemming's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 3,432
4
5
10
Lemming's avatar
Lemming
4
5
10
Maybe people 'do feel worse about killing the baby,
It's more personal, more hands on, my Grandpa on my Father's side, flew bombers,
My Grandpa on my Mother's side, was in the infantry.
Grandpa on my Fathers side, talked about the war some,
Grandpa on my Mother's side, never.
Course might depend on the person, regardless of experiences.

The concept of 'sacrifice,

"Explain to me why it is more noble to kill ten thousand men in battle than a dozen at dinner."
- Game of Thrones Tywin Lannister

People value concepts, as well as people I suppose,
Factors into their decisions,
How one goes about an action can matter to people.

The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas
"Le Guin’s story imagines the fictional city of Omelas, which initially seems a utopia. But this city’s happy wonders come at a cost. In the bowels of the metropolis, there is a room in which a child is being tortured; the only way Omelas can remain a utopia is if the child suffers, and everyone in Omelas knows it. This is the city’s social contract. However, Le Guin writes, a few people, upon learning of the existence of the tortured child as teenagers, choose to abandon this superficially perfect world, seeking imperfection rather than a “perfection”—if it can be called that—predicated on another’s pain."

"I made a mistake!
. . . I made a mistake. Focused on big picture. Big picture made of little picture. Too many variables. Can't hide behind statistics. Can't ignore new data. My responsibility. Need to go. Running out of time."
Mordin Mass Effect

Moon knight had something about a villain who killed people before they would commit their crime I think,
Though he relied on some staff to predict a person's far flung future.
Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,993
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@Savant
Why not try to get him an art tutor?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,253
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Savant
There's ample evidence Germany would have gone to war anyway without Hitler due to the extreme circumstances of the time.

Same with Japan, even if we never A-bombed Japan, the alternative consequences would still have been outrageous.

You would just have 1 dead baby and 2 Japanese cities likely firebombed to the ground like Tokyo.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,775
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

Well, if Trump died from leukemia as a baby we wouldn't have the first Slovenian sex worker as a First Lady.

66 days later

Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,850
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@Savant
When polled on whether they would kill Hitler as a baby, only 42% of NYT readers said yes.

When polled on whether the atomic bombings of Japan were justified, 56% of Americans said yes.

Either people are really uncomfortable with messing up the timeline, or killing 200,000 people to end the war early is considered preferable to killing one person to stop the war entirely.
70 million lives were lost during WWII under Hitler. No nuclear bombs were used.