Credit for Biden, but he should go further

Author: TheUnderdog

Posts

Total: 26
Topic's author
#1
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10

Deportations should not exist under any circumstances.

"But what if they murder/rape?"

Then you behead them, take their blood and organs, and use it to save the lives of American PATRIOTS!! However, the vast majority of the undocumented are harmless and should be treated as such.

High slope ideology is ideal regardless of what the feds want:


Note: I'm posted this comment several times and YouTube felt like taking it down. I don't like that, but there is nothing I can do to stop them.  Being pro death penalty is hate speech according to the YouTube algorithm.  Not that I'm against their right to censor me; because it's a product of the free market (which YouTube controls).  But they let white nationalists utter racist stuff but they won't let me say murderers should get beheaded.  It makes no sense.
#2
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,705
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
USA needs migrants. The more, the better.
#3
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,638
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@TheUnderdog

Remember that Trump's grandfather was a migrant from Germany.
Topic's author
#4
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@FLRW
While technically correct, it shouldn't matter.

Donald Trump could be 100% Native American in a country 90% Native American and support the same policies he does now.  He would still be wrong on the issue.

Anyone should be allowed to live in any country they choose to.
#5
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,492
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@FLRW
Remember that Trump's grandfather was a migrant from Germany.
Probably one of the reasons he insists on high levels of immigration while also balancing that with tough border security 
#6
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,638
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@WyIted

Well, his wife is an immigrant who come here illegally on an Einstein visa. She was a sex worker.
#7
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 396
Posts: 1,819
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@TheUnderdog
Saying things versus calling for the deaths of people, sure you're going to get censored.


Topic's author
#8
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Mall
Saying things versus calling for the deaths of people, sure you're going to get censored.
Who am I calling the death for?  Is it Bob down the street for flipping me off?  No.  Is it Steve for making a joke at my expense?  No.

Is it murderers and rapists?  Yes.

What is your alternative punishment for murder and rape if not the death penalty?

And me advocating for the death of murderers and rapists is me saying things.  You know; conservative things.  Not even far right conservatism; conservatism about 60% of the country agrees with for murder and probably more for rape (Most Americans Favor the Death Penalty Despite Concerns About Its Administration | Pew Research Center).

But to you, I'm a leftist (even though I'm not), so you will disagree with everything I say and I've come to expect that.
Topic's author
#9
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@FLRW
Well, his wife is an immigrant who come here illegally on an Einstein visa. She was a sex worker.
But you see ... if Trump knows you and likes you, then you get an exception even though if he didn't, then she would be kicked out.

All versions of authoritarianism I support I assume somebody I know has that apply to them and I am willing to punish them the same as if all the people I knew that had the thing I'd want to restrict were strangers.  For republicans, it's different.

Like, if someone I know turns out to be a murderer, then I would still want them killed.  Many republicans would be fine with that person being freed if they murdered someone for being a democrat and they were on good terms with them.
Topic's author
#10
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
@Wylted

Probably one of the reasons he insists on high levels of immigration while also balancing that with tough border security 
The tougher on border security you are, the lower your immigration levels will be.  You can't have it both ways.  I prefer to run the country like a business and therefore abolish ICE (very good for businesses).  Anyone that disagrees can't call themselves an economy voter as abolishing ICE would be tremendous for the US economy.
#11
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,492
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@TheUnderdog
The tougher on border security you are, the lower your immigration levels will be. You can't have it both ways
That's a lie. You can simultaneously lower illegal immigration while increasing legal immigration. 
Topic's author
#12
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@WyIted
Lets say 1.200 billion people want to immigrate to the US.  Border security that keeps out 1.197 billion of them leaves 3 million immigrants per year.  Border security that keeps out 1.199 billion of them leaves 1 million immigrants per year.  The former situation is less border security and more immigrants; the ladder is more border security and less immigrants.

My ideal amount of border security keeps out 0 immigrants and we get 1.2 billion the year they want to come.  It will be a brain drain on other countries, but I believe in this thing called America First.  If other countries lose smart people because the US took them, then great.  That benefits America, because population growth is a strength whether that population comes from Nigeria or Russia.  I think it's good for White Americans (and all Americans) to have as many kids as they can afford to grow population and long term GDP the fastest.

This is how we stay ahead of China in terms of GDP.
#13
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,492
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@TheUnderdog
The point of border security is to funnel immigrants into the country in a way where they can be vetted and keep out things like the cartel travelling back and forth. 

You can stop 1 million illegal immigrants while simultaneously expanding legal immigration by 2 million a year.
Topic's author
#14
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@WyIted
The point of border security is to funnel immigrants into the country in a way where they can be vetted and keep out things like the cartel travelling back and forth. 
Here are some things people have with the cartel:

They bring drugs
So does Boehringer

But these drugs kill children and they aren't medical
The people bringing in child killing drugs should be beheaded.  However, the vast majority of undocumented immigrants aren't doing this.  Dead drug dealers sell less drugs than living ones.

You can stop 1 million illegal immigrants while simultaneously expanding legal immigration by 2 million a year.
Why not legalize the 1 million by executive order and get 3 million more taxpayers in the country?  If 1.2 billion people want to move here, then what's the issue?  If America did this, then our population density would only be half that of England.  America has way more land than many people realize and every county can decide for themselves if they want to build undocumented cities in their county (by this, I mean letting the private sector build cities).
#15
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 5,492
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@TheUnderdog
Here is your claim in post 10 

The tougher on border security you are, the lower your immigration levels will be

That's what we are discussing. 
Topic's author
#16
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@WyIted
Yes, and I stand by that claim.

If you deport 1 million undocumented immigrants, then you are being tough on the border.  If you don't deport them, then your immigration levels will be higher.
#17
Savant
Savant's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 2,000
3
7
6
Savant's avatar
Savant
3
7
6
Deportations should not exist under any circumstances.

"But what if they murder/rape?"

Then you behead them, take their blood and organs, and use it to save the lives of American PATRIOTS!!
When you discover hot takes.
#18
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 396
Posts: 1,819
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@TheUnderdog
Apparently it is not saying something. It's calling for the death, encouraging, spreading threats.
Topic's author
#19
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Mall
Apparently it is not saying something. It's calling for the death, encouraging, spreading threats.
Calling for abortion to be banned is the same as saying abortion should be banned.

Calling for rapists to be killed is the same as saying rapists should be killed.

It would be a threat if I said, "I'm going to kill this rapist" and if I encouraged vigilantes to do so without evidence.  Me calling for rapists and murderers to be killed is free speech.

If you rape someone, then you should get killed.  My free speech matters more than the feelings of felons (hate speech is free speech) and my tax dollars matter more to me than rapist's and murderer's lives (part of cutting government spending).
#20
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 396
Posts: 1,819
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@TheUnderdog
I'm saying this is why they censor you. You calling for the death is a threat and adverse.

I understand to you that you just look at it all as free speech.

Not to them that censor. Do you follow me?
Topic's author
#21
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Mall
So your claim is that you think it’s free speech, but Big Tech will censor it because to them, conservative speech is hate speech?
#22
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 396
Posts: 1,819
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@TheUnderdog
No. I said those that censor you see you as making a threat calling for death.
Topic's author
#23
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Mall
But they shouldn't censor me, correct?
#24
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 396
Posts: 1,819
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@TheUnderdog
Couldn't say, Their house their rules. I understand rumble is more lenient.
Topic's author
#25
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@Mall
If you are left wing on the issue, then fine.  The private sector has the right to censor speech, but I don't agree with them actually censoring speech (but they should have the right to do it).  Just like I don't agree with someone smoking weed; but I think they should have the right to do it.
#26
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 396
Posts: 1,819
4
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
4
4
4
-->
@TheUnderdog
That's one thing I couldn't get. If I believe in the right in something, I wouldn't disagree with it. I maybe neutral but I don't disagree if I'm going to support the right for it.

Unless we're talking about something that has nothing to do with harm being possible at all such as judging and making decisions in a beauty contest.