Hot take regarding woman’s bodies

Author: TheUnderdog

Posts

Total: 18
Topic's author
#1
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
Women were meant to be objectified; if they weren't, then no man would want to marry them.

I can’t be sexist; I’m getting a vasectomy before I have sex so the woman I’m with doesn’t have to be on painful birth control meds or risk pregnancy.  All birth control burdens; on me.
#2
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,087
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@TheUnderdog
Currently, all jizz and tissues then?
#3
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,518
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
It could be full anal too. Even better for us, not that much for women. 🤣
#4
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,638
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@IlDiavolo

Actually,  the number one sex act which reliably caused female orgasms was receiving anal sex, with 94% of women achieving orgasm when they partook in anal.
Topic's author
#5
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
I don’t understand why men like anal.  You are getting shit all over your dick.  I would expect women to like anal more because it’s one of the types of sex that doesn’t result in pregnancy so they could enjoy it more.
#6
ludofl3x
ludofl3x's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,071
3
2
2
ludofl3x's avatar
ludofl3x
3
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
Is this like a 'character' you're doing? Serious question. I'm sorry if I can't pick up on your performance art, if that's what it is, I'd like to appreciate it a little more, and as a bonus, be less vexed by your absolutely bizarre posts. It's insane how much you got wrong in three sentences. 
Topic's author
#7
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@ludofl3x
Is this like a 'character' you're doing?
No.  I only say what I believe on here (plus the occasional joke).  If a woman is sufficiently ugly, then the vast majority of men wouldn't want to marry her or have sex with her.

It's insane how much you got wrong in three sentences. 
Are you willing to marry and have sex with a woman that you personally find ugly?  Because she has to look good for me to even consider her.

I would not want to date someone like this and I don't think you would be willing to either:
Topic's author
#8
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@zedvictor4
Currently, all jizz and tissues then?
Sure; it's safer than having sex for real.
#9
ludofl3x
ludofl3x's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,071
3
2
2
ludofl3x's avatar
ludofl3x
3
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
Are you willing to marry and have sex with a woman that you personally find ugly?
This has nothing to do with being objectification. Being attracted to something does not objectify it by default. 
Topic's author
#10
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@ludofl3x
Being attracted to something does not objectify it by default. 
Yes it does.

Objectifying definition:

Sexual objectification is the act of treating a person solely as an object of sexual desire.
I would not want to have sex with an ugly woman, therefore I see no point in dating an ugly woman.

If a woman finds me ugly and refuses to date me because of how I look, then I'm alright with that.  I've had women turn me down because of my autism.  They didn't want to be honest and say it, but when I told them nonchalantly, "you don't want to date me because of my autism", they said, "Well, ... um, ... I mean".  They didn't want to admit their ableism, but it was there (and that's fine).

They don't want to date autistic men; I don't want to date ugly women.
#11
ludofl3x
ludofl3x's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,071
3
2
2
ludofl3x's avatar
ludofl3x
3
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
Being attracted to something does not objectify it by default. 
Yes it does.

Objectifying definition:

Sexual objectification is the act of treating a person solely as an object of sexual desire.
Read that definition again. It does not, in any way, say that if you're attracted to a thing that you've by default objectified it. Objectification divorces all other aspects of a person from their appeal as a sexual partner, which then is based entirely on physical appearance. 

They don't want to date autistic men; I don't want to date ugly women.
I think everybody wins here. 
Topic's author
#12
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@ludofl3x
 Objectification divorces all other aspects of a person from their appeal as a sexual partner, which then is based entirely on physical appearance. 
And I made this claim about women's bodies, not women.  I could say objectified to an extent.

I think everybody wins here. 
Yeah; I don't have to date a woman that finds my autism as a red flag.  If no woman dates me, then I'm fine with that; I got PornHub and I don't want kids.
#13
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,518
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@TheUnderdog
Some men like it because it is tighter than the pussy. Other men like it because they like a good woman's butt,  banging a chick from behind is like a fetish. 

Whatever it is, it's OK. 😁
#14
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,087
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@TheUnderdog
I have been having sex for longer than I care to remember,  have created only two children in that time, and my wife nor any previous partners have ever had an abortion.

I never felt unsafe at anytime.

Are you saying that you would be a "deadbeat", when it comes to sexual responsibility?
Topic's author
#15
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@zedvictor4
Are you saying that you would be a "deadbeat", when it comes to sexual responsibility?
Probably; it's why I would get a vasectomy before I had sex.  Now the woman doesn't even have to take birth control and deal with the side effects.

All birth control burden; on me.
#16
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,638
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@IlDiavolo

Whatever it is, it's OK. 😁
Tru-dat!
#17
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,518
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@zedvictor4
Are you saying that you would be a "deadbeat", when it comes to sexual responsibility?
I saw many cases where men get their girlfriends pregnant eventhough they were very careful of using a method of contraception.

What happen if you get drunk? In this situation any accident can happen. What if you come across with a golddigger? She can trick you into getting her pregnant.

Whatever the situation is, the man has everything to lose. I don’t know if you agree with that, it would be good to know the opinion of a boomer like you about it. 

So, I think vasectomy is the only available method of contraception that is infallible so far because it reduces any risk of ending up with an undesirable life. 
#18
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,087
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@IlDiavolo
There are stupid people out there.

There will always be stupid people out there.

Clever people would be advised to avoid stupid people.


It really is all down to personal responsibility, for both participants.

And any form of surgical sterilization is a sledgehammer to crack a nut choice.

You might find that when you are a bit older and wiser and have a long term partner, that you actually want to start a family.


Though for clever people who have been a bit stupid, there is the option of medical and surgical remedies.

Leaving it and just hoping, is stupid.