I stand for free speech

Author: TheUnderdog

Posts

Total: 16
Topic's author
#1
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
I don't believe any of the following should be censored:

  1. Matt Walsh and his supporters
  2. "From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free" supporters
  3. Pedophilia defenders

There are very few people in G3; but G1 is legal in all 50 states; G2 is censored in all the anti BDS states.

Supporting BDS should be legal in every state.

#2
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,623
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
There is a secret censorship which was created in the most brilliant way, yet so obvious that people dont notice it.

Apparently, free speech doesnt apply to internet.

Yet most of today's communication happens on internet.

Sites are free to censor any opinion they dislike. For example, YouTube will shut down any channel which defends pedophilia.

Even in real life, there is censorship (losing a job, being cancelled, losing friends...).

So yeah, I would say there is nothing "free" in free speech, because people have many ways to punish you for your speech.
#3
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,164
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@TheUnderdog
Do you at any point make arguments? You're permanently stuck in the assertion, declaration of stance, disagreeing about categories stage.
#4
RaymondSheen
RaymondSheen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 327
2
2
6
RaymondSheen's avatar
RaymondSheen
2
2
6
-->
@TheUnderdog
I've always thought that not being able to yell FIRE! in a crowded movie theater because idiots who can't think for themselves would panic and kill one another trying to escape the madness was, well, stupid. Hate speach. How stupid. I hate hate speach but that goes without saying. Or is that thinking? It goes without thinking.  
#5
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@RaymondSheen
Maybe 100 years ago, people would panic if someone yelled fire in a crowded movie theater.

Today, people would be posing for selfies.
#6
RaymondSheen
RaymondSheen's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 327
2
2
6
RaymondSheen's avatar
RaymondSheen
2
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Maybe the modern prohibition would be to yell "Batman!" Or to misgender someone. An actual Batman or Tootsie film being the obvious exceptions. 
#7
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 25,969
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@RaymondSheen
Yeah, I can see how yelling "There are 2 genders!" could cause a stampede in a crowded movie theater.
#8
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@RaymondSheen
I've always thought that not being able to yell FIRE! in a crowded movie theater because idiots who can't think for themselves would panic and kill one another trying to escape the madness was, well, stupid. Hate speach. How stupid. I hate hate speach but that goes without saying. Or is that thinking? It goes without thinking.  
well stated
Topic's author
#9
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@RaymondSheen
I hate hate speach but that goes without saying. 
That's fine, but stating any conservative opinion can be argued to be hate speech.  Prove me wrong with a counterexample.

All hate speech should be legal.
Topic's author
#10
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@3RU7AL
@RaymondSheen
The 1st amendment applies to political speech only.

I've always thought that not being able to yell FIRE! in a crowded movie theater because idiots who can't think for themselves would panic and kill one another trying to escape the madness was, well, stupid. Hate speach. How stupid. I hate hate speach but that goes without saying. Or is that thinking? It goes without thinking.  
All conservative beliefs can be argued to be hate speech (if you think I'm wrong, then prove me wrong).  Should we ban all conservative speech?  No; that would be communist (not an exagerration).
#11
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TheUnderdog
No; that would be communist (not an exagerration).
i'm not sure a community centered social structure demands censorship
Topic's author
#12
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@3RU7AL
Socialism = Communism - censorship of conservative hate speech.

Communism = Socialism + censorship of conservative hate speech. 

I can tolerate socialists; I despise communists.  There is a reason McCarthyism just went after communists, and not socialists.  America has had socialist presidential candidates before.  But we never had a communist candidate before as communism and communists are evil.
#13
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TheUnderdog
Socialism = Communism - censorship of conservative hate speech.
censorship is not integral to either definition
Topic's author
#14
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@3RU7AL
Then what is the difference between communism and socialism?

And I'm not liking my own comments; that's someone else.
#15
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,582
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@TheUnderdog

five types of government that require censorship by definition

1. Authoritarianism
2. Totalitarianism
3. Dictatorship
4. Theocracy
5. Military Junta
Topic's author
#16
TheUnderdog
TheUnderdog's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 4,340
3
5
10
TheUnderdog's avatar
TheUnderdog
3
5
10
-->
@3RU7AL
You can add communism to that.