Robotics can do pretty much anything humans can do and do it much better. More precise and efficiently. Delicate surgery and manual labor in every aspect of the industrial and service arena. You wouldn't think so, though, would you? If you've ever had to talk to any of the son of a bitches on the telephone. The thing is, though, getting rid of money is the key. People tend to think that you have to have it, and up until about the 1970s it was a good system. Since then, robotics can do pretty much everything and money only suppresses advancement. For example, gas powered cars and cancer cures. Cancer is big business but the treatment is only about as efficacious as placebo. It has stayed pretty much the same for about 50 years. There have been cars invented that run on water and 10 or 15 cures for cancer that have been suppressed that are 50 - 60% more effective than the industry standard.
Would you make religions illegal, so atheists like me have to practice their satanism in secret? Thats kinda, I guess I could live with it, but wouldnt that be a waste of resources?
Very little would be illegal. You could do whatever you like without hidden taxes like licenses. Any stupid thing you like as long as you don't interfere with anyone else's rights or safety. You could do whatever drugs, sex, work, religion or anything you wanted. The thing is, money is a big incentive. So, things like politicians, preachers, entertainers etc. who do things just for money wouldn't have the incentive. People would do things they wanted to do and they wouldn't need the money to do it. They also would have no reason to corrupt, for example, science and technology. To suppress its advancement because to do so would diminish their profit.
If you want to make money, use some non-governmental sort of currency (bit-coin, for example) and hoard it and feel superior or "independent" then go for it. But what would be the point when you wouldn't have to? Anything you wanted you could get supplied to anyone free of charge.
I guess you dont support things like forced marriages, but do you support circumcision?
It doesn't matter what I support, that's sort of the point. No one would tell you how to live your life. No one would have that control over anyone else. As long as you don't screw with anyone else's rights. An example. Remember the big fuss a few years back over some cake maker who refused to make a gay themed wedding cake? The law said he had to. He wouldn't have to. To say he has to is a violation of his rights. So, modern democracy takes the individual's rights and sacrifices them for the rights of certain groups. That isn't fair.
And how will people fight each other in your society? Will it just be verbal fights where people insult each other until one of them cries?
That would be up to them. Let's say there was a physical altercation, a person asaults another. That would be a punishable crime. But if two people agreed to a physical fight, let them have at it.
I prefer tyranny, of course, but one can understand why people like being able to make choices in life, even tho I oppose to that, personally. I think one man should make choices and others are just supposed to blindly obey. That is fair and makes sense.
It doesn't make sense at all. But it's subjective, isn't it. If, for example, you wanted to be a tyrant and have that control, and others wanted to be controlled in that way, go for it. But, it wouldn't be likely, would it? You would likely only be tyrant of yourself. If someone tried (and I'm sure they would) to force their own tyranny that would be a violation of other's rights. A punishable crime.
