Do we really have evidence of evolution of man from apes?
When will the rest of these apes change?
Why hasn't anything else changed in that manner?
Why couldn't dinosaurs live along side man?
Dinosaurs exist with us now we know.
Do we really have evidence of the big bang explosion?
Posts
Total:
34
-->
@Mall
Do we really have evidence of evolution of man from apes?
Yes
When will the rest of these apes change?
In time
Why hasn't anything else changed in that manner?
Everything else changed in that manner
Why couldn't dinosaurs live along side man?
Dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years before man came along.
Dinosaurs exist with us now we know.
That was just a movie.
-->
@Mall
Why couldn't dinosaurs live along side man?
Because mammals hid under ground when the dinosaurs went extinct. Sure they could’ve lived beside us, if they didn’t go extinct from us hunting them of course.
Do we really have evidence of the big bang explosion?
CMB. Look it up cuz I’m too lazy to type a whole paragraph on something I only know partly about.
-->
@Mall
We are the ape that changed after the "Dinosaurs" we wiped out.
In so much as Dinosaurs didn't survive, but their relatives did.
Though I would suggest that material evolution preceded organic development, and may well succeed inorganically, perhaps after a period of hybridisation.
And a process of ongoing material development, does suggest a point of initiation.
Call it BIG BOOM
Or Call it GOD.
I some times refer to it as RE-INITIATION,
But that's another theory.
-->
@Mall
Do we really have evidence of evolution of man from apes?
Men are apes. DNA is the strongest evidence (fossil morphology was pretty strong on its own)
When will the rest of these apes change?
They have already changed from the last common ancestor. Abstract intelligence is hardly a predestination for natural selection regardless.
Why hasn't anything else changed in that manner?
If "that manner" = significantly increased abstract intelligence, there examples of other lines on that path. Cetaceans, pachyderms, and dinosaurs included. The last common ancestor with dinosaurs was probably a squat near-amphibious simpleton but some today have evolved to have complex social lives and problem solving skills.
Why couldn't dinosaurs live along side man?
There are dinosaurs 2 meters away from me as I'm typing. These ones always chirp in the morning.
Dinosaurs exist with us now we know.
Yes
-->
@Mall
Do we really have evidence of evolution of man from apes?
No, this is a common misconception. We are primates that aren't apes like scorpions are arachnids that aren't spiders. We are not apes, we were a deviation like Neanderthals and Homo Erectus and 2 others were.
When will the rest of these apes change?
Excluding direct mutations, they won't but freak babies that are advantageous to their environment are why different fur variations and bodily variations exist among them. Over time and elite bloodline suited to the environment can massfuck/reproduce ikwnausnour monogamous society bans humans from evolving with other than Islamic harems.
Why hasn't anything else changed in that manner?
It has, insects and bacteria do it very regularly.
Why couldn't dinosaurs live along side man?
Many reasons, the environments that best suited them are so dry and hot that they are unlivable for us and vice versa.
Dinosaurs exist with us now we know.
You mean crocodiles or what?
monogamous society bans humans from evolving with other than Islamic harems.
Yes, we should go back to times when only 10% of men get laid.
There are so many weird things going on in this planet that the evolution theory is not the best explanation for that.
I already said it and this is what I hold, there has been a third hand that intervened in the fate of this planet, imho.
-->
@Mall
I see what you are saying. Trump is stupider than an ape , so humans could not have come from apes.
-->
@FLRW
Trump is clearly descended from Yeti.
-->
@FLRW
Is that a photo of Lucifer Morningstar?
-->
@Best.Korea
Yes, see you at the Lux !
The "big bang" is a theory it isn't fact. I for one reject it because all of creation coming from a singularity with no dimensions seems quite preposterous to me. No one knows how the universe began and most likely never will. All of humanity will most likely go extinct before that question is ever answered definitively.
-->
@FLRW
Does it take stupidity to be successful as a legitimate millionaire and billionaire?
Maybe because apes get taken care of for free in zoos. They don't have to fork over a dime or receive a dime do they?
Maybe because apes get taken care of for free in zoos. They don't have to fork over a dime or receive a dime do they?
-->
@RationalMadman
So man never evolved from non man.
Dinosaurs that exist with us today are their bones.
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
When will the apes , gorillas in the animal zoo in a cage kept by zookeepers evolve into mankind that can go into the human zoo better known as the penal prison?
-->
@Mall
Enough of this trollish prattling. *storms off to laugh tape*
-->
@Mall
Yes it did but it wasn't an ape, this being was in between ape and human it was as hairy as some of the hairiest among us.
-->
@zedvictor4
God or the big boom .
The big boom is another religion then. The atheists that believe in the big boom are religious.
-->
@JoeBob
Hunting them, that's funny.
-->
@Sidewalker
Think some more before you respond to this.
Mall is what would happen if Best Korea had a stroke.
Yes, The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is the cooled remnant of the first light that could ever travel freely throughout the Universe. This 'fossil' radiation, the furthest that any telescope can see, was released soon after the 'Big Bang'. Scientists consider it as an echo or 'shockwave' of the Big Bang.
-->
@RationalMadman
So do we have evidence of man evolving from non man or do the scientists just believe in this based on something similar in another process?
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Stumped you . I'm sure a scientist has an answer.
-->
@Mall
So we couldn’t hunt them down if they existed right now? Even if we didn’t kill them back then we surely could now.
-->
@Mall
The big boom is another religion then. The atheists that believe in the big boom are religious.
I believe that it is cereal first then milk, does that make me religious?
-->
@Mall
I would suggest that the BIG BOOM is both hypothetical and analogical.
Exactly the same as GOD.
I believe neither, but accept both.
Though I tend to run with the general idea of an initiation event followed by a prolonged period of material evolution.
But not in a particularly "religious" fashion.
-->
@zedvictor4
What do you mean by "believe neither, but accept both"?
What's supposed to be the difference?