Here is the video.
Note: He never debunks the arguments presented by the people he is critiquing. They claim (emotionally which isn't my taste) that abortion will harm those that can get pregnant (I'm not trying to make this about transgenderism, but fetuses can't get pregnant regardless of their chromosomes). Ben Shapiro attacks their character instead of the points they are making.
A mass murderer can say that the sky is blue and the sky is still blue. Character is irrelevant to the message you send.
Ben Shapiro never debunked their points, he merely attacked their character instead of attacking the idea they were stating.
The closest thing he said was, "You are killing your baby girl". The Pro Abortion Legalization (PAL) crowd has argued that regardless of the gender of the fetus, that it should be legal for most pregnancies to be aborted due to concerns of pregnant individual's right to bodily autonomy (most women aren't pregnant right now, so women shouldn't be confused with pregnant person).
If you are Ben Shapiro, you then justify why it is okay to force someone to be pregnant for 9 months based on consensual sex in order to save the life of a zygote. He would have to defend that position if it is what he believes.
He doesn't; he goes after character, and then dodges to make it about Trump.
If he wants to talk about Trump, then he makes the video, "Trump was involved with .... " and he doesn't then make the title, "Abortion ... ". If you want 2 separate videos, then do 2 separate videos. Just stay on topic.
But if Ben Shapiro takes the pro life position (or as I call it, the ANti Abortion Legalization (ANAL) position), then I have no issue with it. But then he has to defend that instead of attacking irrelevant aspects of the person he is critiquing. It would also mean he would have to disagree with the abortion policy of ISRAEL (which has very left wing abortion laws) (Israel eases access to abortion, days after US Supreme Court overturns Roe vs Wade | The Times of Israel).
He won't do this though because he wants to appeal to Israel and to the ANAL movement (solely because both are backed by republicans) despite the contradiction (while Palestine is very ANAL in it's abortion policy). The left wingers are against genocide.
How does the right back both the ANAL position while backing a country in a war where they have the PAL position and their opponents have the ANAL position? If abortion isn't your big voting issue, then fine. But for a lot of ANAL advocates, it's their sole reason for voting republican, so you would expect them to be anti Israel.
But people have parties to stick too.
My position is I am neither too strongly PAL or ANAL; I'm Pro vasectomy; it solves the concerns of the PAL and ANAL crowd with abortion. I will get a vasectomy before I have sex and I should since my primary abortion position varies a lot from time to time, but I'm leading more towards the PAL side now because every pregnancy poses a risk to the mother's life.
