How to use Google effectively to improve your research skills for debate

Author: WyIted

Posts

Total: 12
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 31
Posts: 5,455
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Here is a video that will help you improve you googling skills. The speaker sounds like an effeminate beta male, but he in fact is a sleeper alpha. https://youtu.be/nsaVTv_kEvg?si=vA9-kN7_pd7pod4P

Some of you already know how to get more from google search engine results, but if you think there is more to learn about how to google than watch the video.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@WyIted
being alpha isn't about being smart.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@WyIted

how did you miss this one?
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 31
Posts: 5,455
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@RationalMadman
It seems to be mostly the same results as google. The difference is they don't track you as much

WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 31
Posts: 5,455
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Also I messed up on the quotes. It is probably more fitting for longer strings of text than individual words, but it works either way

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@WyIted
for that particular search sure, try to word it better. You said Qanon is real, not Qanon explained.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@WyIted
try a theory a little less dumb than Qanon and you'll see the difference.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 31
Posts: 5,455
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
I would like to get into creating your own search engine with searx for even better results but it's beyond the scope of the video/
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 574
Posts: 19,931
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@WyIted
'mafia game lynching' gets the result. Many games switched to elimination instead because of the very reason you realised there.

your quotation marks should only cover one thing not 2 and that thing in the quotes will be in the search results, using 2 doesn't help the word and is always ignored.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 31
Posts: 5,455
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Using 2 should be fine. For example "john smith" AND "had anal sex" . However yes I agree it shouldn't be around single words like I used there. I had different results googling that with and without quotation marks. Neither results are easily explainable if I don't clear my history

WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 31
Posts: 5,455
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
I tried some techniques that were useful to me before but may be deprecated or I am doing them wrong. For example BEFORE: 2015 and also BEFORE:2015 both still gave me results for after 2015

Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,621
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
If you debate whatever google finds popular, you will always have sources on your side.

I am not saying its impossible to debate non-popular opinions, but it takes more effort to find sources.