Supreme Court denies my declaration that the entire democratic party is barred from holding office

Author: ADreamOfLiberty

Posts

Total: 4
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,181
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 26,051
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
I am sure the left-tribe is breathing a relaxed sigh considering you had declared them all in violation of section 3.
Double_R
Double_R's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 5,283
3
2
5
Double_R's avatar
Double_R
3
2
5
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I support the effort, ban them all. As soon as you can present actual facts and valid logic connecting the dots showing your claim to have merit...

*Holding my breath... And I'm dead now*
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,181
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@Double_R
What we all have to agree now? It was so much fun as a free for all. You can have your set of genuine office holders and I can have mine. This won't lead to civil war at all.

Stupid supreme court seems to want to avoid civil war. Just putting off the inevitable. (joke)