I have doubts that more than a handful of people actually exist in this world anymore.

Author: janesix

Posts

Total: 24
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,049
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
Maybe a few hundred, a few thousand?

Or maybe just one.

Everything is fake.

The world is becoming smaller and more constricted all the time.

The unpleasantness of the world may be the whatever trying to get me to just fucking wake up. 

The party's over and I'm one of the few lingering on, pissing off the host.

This world is so fake it would be embarrassing to pretend I actually still thought it was real.




Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,641
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Yes, the world is fake, but good news is that you can create an imaginary world in which everything is perfect. Or you can drink.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,641
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Well, I always thought internet was fake.

Even on YouTube, same comments keep gettinng posted over and over for thousand times.
janesix
janesix's avatar
Debates: 12
Posts: 2,049
3
3
3
janesix's avatar
janesix
3
3
3
-->
@Best.Korea
I might do both
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,604
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@janesix

Well, life in the Universe is an accident and as such, it only occurred on one planet.
n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,023
3
2
5
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
5
life's a journey, not a destination
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,920
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@n8nrgim
life's a journey,...

Death is the individuals destination.

...space...* i *........space........> >Death >> ....space......~~~....space..........> Quantum Fields (~~~~)(~~~) aka vibrations.

And can be stated as..... ' Modulation/moderation of angle and frequency '.......paraphrase Bucky Fuller

..... < infinite.....truly non-occupied space.....@......space that is truly non-occupied is infinite >............

@ = finite, occupied space Universe aka perpetual motion > Gravity  (  ) and Dark Energy   )( and physical reality /\/\/\/\/






zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@janesix
Hello janesix.

Good to see that you are back.

I hope that despite your concerns,  you are actually well.



For sure, everything  you think that you know is  actually a simulation of everything you think is knowable.

Fact is, your brain makes it all up .

Even the thinking bit...You think that you think, as it were.


So your existence can only ever be a temporary assumption.


And therefore we can only assume that we do actually interact with a material universe.


sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,170
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
-->
@janesix
So it is said there are about 7 billion people in the world. You think there are only a few thousand  a few hundred or even one that are real. What qualifies you as being one of the few thousand, few hundred or the only one as being real? 

Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 2,669
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@janesix
How are you using the words "exist" and "real"?

What do you mean when you say the world isn't "real", what does that mean?

Only a handful of people "actually exist", what does that even mean?  

Exist, real, illusion, I see these words used a lot but I rarely see them used in a way that has meaning.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@sadolite
Internal self-qualification, same as everyone else.

Everyone else being an internal product of everyone  else's internal computing systems.


Supposedly, 8 billion plus now.

Agglomerated vehicles of fundamental matter, transporting an onboard computer to some meaningful or meaningless end.


Crazy stuff, yet for the most part we take it for granted.


What's it all about Sadolite?


And here's wishing you and yours a healthy and hopefully not too angst ridden new year.
sadolite
sadolite's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,170
3
2
4
sadolite's avatar
sadolite
3
2
4
"Internal self-qualification, same as everyone else."  Isn't this contradictory to everything not being real if you are the "same as everyone else".

Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,205
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
Identical twins.
 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@sadolite
@Deb-8-a-bull
Random thoughts.


Yes and no.

Who knows.

We worry about the vehicle.

Because the vehicle supports and propels the onboard worrying device.

Twin machines different but similar, though worrying devices will develop separately.


The head with it's orifices and sensory devices is an amazingly crazy thing.

And the vehicle with all it's pipes, fibres, framework and waterproof covering, is crazy but true too.

According to the worrying device.


And for a short while, if the top bit remains fully intact and functioning, and connected to the fully intact and functioning bottom bit.

That's what will happen.


And then there's all the crazy reproductive stuff.

And DNA and cells and shit.

Yep, we convert organic matter and water into fuel and expel unwanted bi-products.


Absolutely crazy that we piss and copulate via the same outlet/inlet ports.

How's that for functionality.


And then it all switches off and eventually breaks down to re-join the fundamental state of the universe.

Worry no more.


The end.
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,205
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
I had i hunch that.   
The world is not as it appears.
What gave it away for me wasssss. 

For me to be here.
( Thats I ) 
For me to be here right,  would MEAN that my parents would of had to of had sex together ? 
????
Right.

Well let me stop you there.
The answer is NO. 
Becauseeeeeeeeee 

▪•°  I KNOW FOR A FACT. °▪•

My mother and father would NOT do something like " fuck " each other. 
THATS.       
WOULD NOT.   
DO anything like  sexual intercourse together. 
Don't ask me how i know,  They just wouldn't right. 
FULL STOP


Haha,  Wow that was hard to type.  ( My mum fuck my dad. )


Anyways , wher was i. 
Yer 
So morons ,
you'll have to think of another reason why , I and you,  "AM HERE".
As of RIGHT NOW.        Cause ummm , it aint from fucking. 





ACTUALLY ..  i don't care.m
You lot are all dickheads
You lot wouldn't NO nothing between yas.
Fucking idiots. 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
wouldn't no nothing.
Analyse and weep Deb.

Analyse and weep.


And that's not a compound word, consisting of anal,  and an anagram of yes. 


And I bet your Dad was hung like a Donkey.

And your Mum screamed like a Howler Monkey.

No offence intended.
Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,205
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
Fucking hell zed . You keep 
Pushing and pushing.

Ok then.
Enough already alright. M

I will settle for.  
They may of had sex , ( One time ) 
Well two times actually. 
But only (  two times  ) 
DEFINITELY NO MORE. 

And it would of been 1 maybe 2 minutes tops. 
And only in missionary position.
Nothing else. 

Nope.

There wasn't NO fancy doggy style
Nothing like that.
They wouldn't of even liked doing it. 
No head bashing on the bed head. 
Dad didn't CHOKE me mar. 
OWWWWWWWWWW.
 

Just a quick in then out.
Oh.
Then in for the last stoke.

This would of also been planed.
Its not like my mum just went. 
You can cum in me if ya want darl. 
It does not fucking happen alright. 

Ouchhhhhh. 
Real difficult typing that last sentence.

Sexual relations  may of happened a couple of times.
But not for like fun or nothing. 
Totally non enjoyable. 
And non eventful. 
 

Look
I don't wanna continue this conversation anymore. 
Can we just drop it Zee. ?

I take it back. 
Ya not a dickhead. 
Im sorry, its just .
Well.  


Good day sir. 

 

zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,071
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Can you prove any of that.

Just asking.


So you appeared nine months after the wedding?

Or your sibling did.

And the other one appeared...let's say 10 months after that. Give Mum a month to recover.


And the condoms in the bedside drawers...What were they for, water bombs to throw at the neighbours or something.

And those funny noises they used to make, when you should have been asleep.


At it.

Hammer and tongs Deb.

Rabbits Deb.


And don't think for one minute that your partner invented fellatio Deb.

And you certainly didn't invent cunnilingus.


Lordy Lordy...Makes you wonder how much love syrup's been consumed since the advent of recreational sex.

Easily enough to fill 10 Olympic sized swimming pools.

Just imagine diving into that Deb.

24 days later

FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,604
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@janesix

Everything is fake !

19 days later

Critical-Tim
Critical-Tim's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 902
3
2
7
Critical-Tim's avatar
Critical-Tim
3
2
7
-->
@FLRW
I would say the contrary; everything is real. It is only a matter of incorrectly classifying what something is that would give the illusion it is fake.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,604
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Critical-Tim

Reality does not exist. Wave-particle duality is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, which is our modern theory of how subatomic particles behave. The duality states that all particles (in fact, all objects) have a wave-like property associated with them.  Wave–particle duality is the concept in quantum mechanics that quantum entities exhibit particle or wave properties according to the experimental circumstances.
Critical-Tim
Critical-Tim's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 902
3
2
7
Critical-Tim's avatar
Critical-Tim
3
2
7
-->
@FLRW
I don't see why waves aren't considered to exist. Are you referring to the Cambridge definition of exist?
Cambridge definition of exist: "to be; have the ability to be known, recognized, or understood"
Considering you know that everything is waves, it has the ability to be known or recognized, so reality does exist.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,604
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Critical-Tim
Quantum mechanics has overthrown the classical concept of a particle as an object. Now a particle is a quantum event which exhibits weird nonclassical effects of superposition and entanglement. Wave functions seem like a promising step towards merging physical reality with all its constraints (cosmic speed limit, conservation laws of energy, momentum etc) with quantum reality. Think of quantum events as where energy etc is transferred between interacting wave functions. Each event is like one frame in a movie but random and in vast numbers giving the impression of a continuum approximating a classical particle (such as tracks in a bubble chamber). What exists between events? If wave functions are real they would provide continuity between events. Interesting unsolved questions might be solved if wave functions are real. How do wave functions affect space-time hence gravity, and vice-versa? Do wave functions have mass additional to the masses of quantum particles they create? Considering that 95% of the energy in the universe remains unexplained the reality of wave functions should not be dismissed!
Critical-Tim
Critical-Tim's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 902
3
2
7
Critical-Tim's avatar
Critical-Tim
3
2
7
-->
@FLRW
That sounds interesting, but I don't understand your point.