AI Generated Debate regarding Free Will and Gender Identity

Author: Critical-Tim

Posts

Total: 15
Critical-Tim
Critical-Tim's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 902
3
2
7
Critical-Tim's avatar
Critical-Tim
3
2
7
This debate explores the relationship between free will and gender identity, and the implications for individual and social well-being. It presents two opposing arguments: one that views free will and determinism as compatible, and one that views them as incompatible. The debate examines the definitions, assumptions, evidence, and counterarguments of each position, and evaluates their strengths and weaknesses. The debate aims to provide a nuanced and balanced perspective on the complex and controversial issues of free will and gender identity.

I hope this to be entertaining. Feel free to criticize either position for a more elaborate response.
Critical-Tim
Critical-Tim's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 902
3
2
7
Critical-Tim's avatar
Critical-Tim
3
2
7
Defender’s Argument (Compatibilism):
  • Main Claim: Gender identity is influenced by biological factors, but not determined by them. Biological factors, such as genetics, hormones, and brain structure, play a significant role in predisposing individuals to certain gender expressions, such as clothing, hairstyle, or behavior. However, other factors, such as personal experiences and cultural influences, also contribute to the complexity and diversity of gender identity (Fisher et al., 2018).
  • Assumption: Free will is the ability to act in accordance with one’s identity, reasons, and values, while recognizing the influence of biological and social factors. This view is based on the philosophical position that free will and determinism are compatible, and that rational agency is the key criterion for free will (Kane, 2005).
  • Supporting Evidence: Scientific studies indicate a complex interplay between biological and environmental factors in gender identity formation (Savic & Arver, 2014). For example, a meta-analysis of 32 studies found that transgender individuals had a higher likelihood of carrying certain gene variants related to sex hormone signaling (Hare et al., 2019). Psychological research underscores the positive impact of aligning actions with gender identity on well-being (Olson et al., 2016). For example, a longitudinal study of 55 transgender youth found that those who received puberty blockers reported lower levels of depression and anxiety than those who did not (de Vries et al., 2014). While these findings support the main claim, they also acknowledge the nuanced nature of the relationship between biology and gender identity, and the possibility of individual variation and change over time (Diamond, 2016).
  • Counterarguments and Responses: Some critics may argue that biological factors are the primary or sole determinants of gender identity, and that any deviation from the sex assigned at birth is unnatural or abnormal. This argument may be challenged by pointing out the limitations and biases of biological research, the diversity and fluidity of gender across cultures and history, and the ethical and human rights implications of denying or suppressing one’s gender identity (Heyes, 2018). Other critics may argue that biological factors are irrelevant or negligible in gender identity formation, and that individuals have complete freedom and flexibility to choose and change their gender at will. This argument may be challenged by pointing out the empirical evidence and personal experiences of biological influences on gender identity, the potential consequences and challenges of changing one’s gender, and the importance of authenticity and coherence in one’s sense of self (Westbrook & Schilt, 2014).
  • Conclusion: Aligning one’s gender with one’s identity is an expression of free will, navigating the interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic factors. This argument recognizes that biology plays a substantial role, but not a deterministic one, in shaping one’s gender identity. It also acknowledges the role of personal and social factors, and how they interact with biological factors. Limitations may include the complexity and uncertainty of biological influences, and the argument relates to the broader debate by emphasizing a nuanced and balanced view that considers both deterministic and autonomous aspects.
References
de Vries, A. L., McGuire, J. K., Steensma, T. D., Wagenaar, E. C., Doreleijers, T. A., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2014). Young adult psychological outcome after puberty suppression and gender reassignment. Pediatrics, 134(4), 696-704. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-2958
Diamond, M. (2016). Biological aspects of gender identity and transgenderism. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2016.1094434
Fisher, A. D., Ristori, J., Fanni, E., Castellini, G., Forti, G., & Maggi, M. (2016). Gender identity, gender assignment and reassignment in individuals with disorders of sex development: a major of dilemma. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 39(11), 1207-1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0485-8
Hare, L., Bernard, P., Sánchez, F. J., Baird, P. N., Vilain, E., Kennedy, T., & Harley, V. R. (2019). Androgen receptor repeat length polymorphism associated with male-to-female transsexualism. Biological Psychiatry, 65(1), 93-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.08.033
Heyes, C. J. (2018). Anaesthetics of existence: Essays on experience at the edge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Kane, R. (2005). A contemporary introduction to free will. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Olson, K. R., Durwood, L., DeMeules, M., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2016). Mental health of transgender children who are supported in their identities. Pediatrics, 137(3), e20153223. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3223
Savic, I., & Arver, S. (2014). Sex dimorphism of the brain in male-to-female transsexuals. Cerebral Cortex, 24(11), 2835-2848. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht183
Westbrook, L., & Schilt, K. (2014). Doing gender, determining gender: Transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society, 28(1), 32-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213503203


Contender’s Argument (Incompatibilism):
  • Main Claim: Individuals have the freedom and flexibility to choose and express their gender independently of biological and social factors. This argument emphasizes the primacy of individual choice and agency in determining and enacting one’s gender identity, regardless of their sex assigned at birth or physical appearance (Westbrook & Schilt, 2014).
  • Assumption: Free will is the ability to choose among alternative courses of action, implying the absence of strict external influences or determinants in the decision-making process. This view is based on the philosophical position that free will and determinism are incompatible, and that causal influences negate the possibility of genuine choice (van Inwagen, 1983).
  • Supporting Evidence: Philosophical principles supporting individual rights and self-definition, coupled with sociological insights into the malleability of gender as a social construct, empower individuals to freely choose their gender identities (Heyes, 2018). For example, John Stuart Mill argued that individuals should have the liberty to pursue their own good in their own way, as long as they do not harm others (Mill, 1859). Judith Butler suggested that gender is a performative act, and that individuals can subvert the norms of gender by enacting different styles of gender (Butler, 1990). However, this argument also acknowledges the potential impact of societal norms and discrimination on individual choices, and discusses how individuals can resist or challenge them (Norton & Herek, 2013).
  • Counterarguments and Responses: Some critics may argue that individuals do not have the freedom and flexibility to choose their gender, as they are constrained or influenced by biological and social factors. This argument may be challenged by pointing out the limitations and biases of biological and social research, the diversity and fluidity of gender across cultures and history, and the ethical and human rights implications of denying or suppressing one’s gender identity (Heyes, 2018). Other critics may argue that individuals should not have the freedom and flexibility to choose their gender, as they should conform to the norms and expectations of their sex assigned at birth or physical appearance. This argument may be challenged by pointing out the empirical evidence and personal experiences of the benefits of aligning one’s gender with one’s identity, the potential consequences and challenges of conforming to the norms and expectations of others, and the importance of diversity and individuality in one’s sense of self (Westbrook & Schilt, 2014).
  • Conclusion: The ability to choose and adapt gender freely is an exercise of true free will, promoting self-expression and autonomy. This argument recognizes that societal constructs play a role, but it underscores the primacy of individual choice and agency. It also acknowledges the potential impact of biological and social factors, and how individuals can cope or overcome them. Limitations may include the potential influence of subtle or unconscious factors, and the argument relates to the broader debate by championing a robust stance on personal agency in gender identity formation.
References
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
Heyes, C. J. (2018). Anaesthetics of existence: Essays on experience at the edge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. London, UK: John W. Parker and Son.
Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of US adults. Sex Roles, 68(11-12), 738-753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6
van Inwagen, P. (1983). An essay on free will. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Westbrook, L., & Schilt, K. (2014). Doing gender, determining gender: Transgender people, gender panics, and the maintenance of the sex/gender/sexuality system. Gender & Society, 28(1), 32-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213503203
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,062
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
A. "Gender identity" is influenced by ongoing socio-psychological ideas and  pressures.

B. Whereas the reality of gender is dictated by biological factors...

C. And maybe environmental influences such as food, water and atmospheric contamination/changes etc.

Though I think  that it would be incorrect to suggest that A cannot influence B...Nor can C not  influence B and  influence A.


The modification of the species in this way, maybe an inevitable  universal evolutionary  necessity.

And it would also be foolish to ignore ongoing technological development and the role it plays in material progression.


Free will, as in random uninfluenced behaviour, is unlikely to be possible.

Even the mad-person responds to a stimulus....Don't they?


FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,591
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

Brain Sex Differences Related to Gender Identity Development: Genes or Hormones?

CoolApe
CoolApe's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 87
0
1
6
CoolApe's avatar
CoolApe
0
1
6
-->
@Critical-Tim
I don't think there have been any rigorous studies to prove that gender reassignment surgery improves the mental health of transgender people, yet we're supposed to believe that individuals with gender dysphoria suffer needlessly without gender affirming care.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,062
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@CoolApe
Being  conditioned to accept a new normal is the norm.

I'm not sure who or what works  it all out.

But it just seems to happen.


Pre-conditioned older folk like myself either keep up or don't bother.
CoolApe
CoolApe's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 87
0
1
6
CoolApe's avatar
CoolApe
0
1
6
-->
@zedvictor4
Emile Durkheim noticed the rise of suicide rates with the modernization of society. 

He suggested the breakdown of social organizations and norms (standards) makes it harder for individuals to find the pursuit of anything meaningful.

Being  conditioned to accept a new normal is the norm.
I argue this is simply heading us towards normlessness. 

I'm not sure who or what works it all out.
But it just seems to happen.
Perhaps not. Civilization may collapse eventually because of the failure of our culture. 
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,062
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@CoolApe
I would suggest that the new normal is relentless, ongoing and unstoppable.

Just like getting old and not keeping up.

I would further suggest that technology and social media dictates the new norm now.

Modern culture is now a global phenomenon, though it may encompass vestiges of old culture.


Civilization may collapse eventually because of the failure of our culture.
You're already sounding out of date.

Just like Emile.

Simply because, you were conditioned previously.

It happens to us all...We lack the ability to continuously re-programme.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 357
Posts: 10,602
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@CoolApe
He suggested the breakdown of social organizations and norms (standards) makes it harder for individuals to find the pursuit of anything meaningful.
You mean the empty life of going to work and after work just doing resting and empty consumerism isnt meaningful?

But thats what you guys wanted. You wanted to have lots of stuff, but you have to work so much for them that you no longer enjoy them.

Masses ruin everything they touch, really, including themselves.

This is why Socialism can only work as a dictatorship. Socialism cannot be run by the people, as people are pure idiots.

Just look at the internet, place of education, but people turned it into place of verbal abuse and watching irrelevant videos that teach you nothing.

There needs to be someone smart and skilled to run Socialism in USA.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,591
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Best.Korea

Hey, if we didn't have the internet I couldn't see nude pictures of Melania.
Critical-Tim
Critical-Tim's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 902
3
2
7
Critical-Tim's avatar
Critical-Tim
3
2
7
-->
@zedvictor4
I don't think it's that we can't continue reprogramming, but that it gets tiresome and the reward of conforming is no longer worth the effort.
It's simply easier to just say this is how it's always been and stand on that.

I'm not for or against ongoing conformation; instead, I think that people choose the path that is better for themself.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,062
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Critical-Tim
I think that formatively we acquire a sort of operating system of data, which stays with us for life, and is never forgotten unless we experience a system malfunction.

Though for sure, as we get older we can acquire and utilise new data, though you will find that this new stuff is less significant in terms of how we interact socially, and also easily forgotten if not utilised regularly.

Which isn't to say that there are not extreme strategies for re-programming.
CoolApe
CoolApe's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 87
0
1
6
CoolApe's avatar
CoolApe
0
1
6
-->
@zedvictor4
The existence of transgenders in society doesn't bother me.

Allowing/mandating gender-affirming care to minors is troubling. Professionals recommending sex-reassignment surgery (sterilization) as a cure for depressed/anxious/lonely people is also problematic.

As I said before:
There haven't been any rigorous studies to prove that gender reassignment surgery improves the mental health of transgender people.

Long term observations of suicide rates between transgenders and sex-reassigned transgenders would be a decent non-subjective measure for this.



zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 12,062
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@CoolApe
Yep, I would agree with most if not all of that.

I pretty sure that there have been no rigorous studies, and certainly no conclusive studies, relative to the causes of the modern phenomenon of transgenderism.
Critical-Tim
Critical-Tim's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 902
3
2
7
Critical-Tim's avatar
Critical-Tim
3
2
7
-->
@CoolApe
Allowing/mandating gender-affirming care to minors is troubling. Professionals recommending sex-reassignment surgery (sterilization) as a cure for depressed/anxious/lonely people is also problematic.
It definitely doesn't seem like a proper solution to the problem. I think it may be intentional to remove the reproductive abilities of people with sexual health conditions, at least until a real solution is found.