The Bible never says the Earth is flat
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 6 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 4
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
BrotherDThomas thinks the earth is flat because Jesus said so, which is WRONG
The word translated “corners,” as in the phrase above, is the Hebrew word, KANAPH. Kanaph is translated in a variety of ways. However, it generally means extremity.
It is translated “borders” in Numbers 15:38. In Ezekiel 7:2 it is translated “four corners” and again in Isaiah 11:12 “four corners.” Job 37:3 and 38:13 as “ends.”There are many ways in which God the Holy Spirit could have said corner. Any of the following Hebrew words could have been used:
- Pinoh is used in reference to the cornerstone.
- Paioh means “a geometric corner”
- Ziovyoh means “right angle” or “corner”
- Krnouth refers to a projecting corner.
- Paamouth - If the Lord wanted to convey the idea of a square, four-cornered Earth, the Hebrew word paamouth could have been used. Paamouth means square.
“his description is repeated almost word-for-word in Daniel 4:20. Both skeptics and the flat-earthers reason that on a spherical earth it would not be possible for a tree to be visible from the entire earth, but such a tree could be visible anywhere on a flat earth. But what is the context of these verses? The fourth chapter of Daniel is the account of Nebuchadnezzar’s second dream. Verse 4 directly quotes the words of Nebuchadnezzar stating that he had a dream. Verses 10–17 quote Nebuchadnezzar describing the content of his dream. Note that this is a dream. With their wild and fantastic elements, dreams hardly are statements about reality, let alone cosmology. t is remarkable that anyone would construe the content of a pagan king’s dream recorded in Scripture as evidence that the Bible teaches that the earth is flat.“-https://answersingenesis.org/astronomy/earth/does-bible-teach-earth-flat/
As if you aren't mortified enough because of your ignorance of Christianity, then with your bible ignorant statement above, and in your way of thinking, the Christian IS NOT to take Joseph’s dream as the proof for Jesus being conceived by the Holy Spirit! This is because, as you stated, it is a dream that Joseph had and therefore is not to be taken literally, along with following your additional intentions, then Jesus being conceived by the Holy Spirit becomes false! Where does your Christian stupidity end?
“But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, 'Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins” (Matthew 1:20). Dr. Franklin, clean your shoes off again, where totally inept Christians like you are so predictable and easy to humiliate in the name of Jesus.
What is truly sad in your Satanic position, is that you don’t have the sense to feel embarrassed for calling Jesus a LIAR in this debate! Instead of accepting Jesus’ direct and specific “inspired words” within His bible as true (Proverbs 30:5), relative to the earth being FLAT, you grasp for proverbial straws and laughably produce insidious WISHFUL THINKING OPINION QUOTES to call Jesus’ words a LIE!!! These embarrassing quotes are shown below at your expense:
Relative to your comical “it could have meant” statements above, which are not biblical absolutes but “maybes,” what part of the following requirement listed in my opening statement didn’t you understand?:“All explanations will be biblically vouchsafed, WITH ABSOLUTELY NO OPINIONS garnered from both debaters, whereas no debate can truly stand upon subjective OPINIONS, but rather upon the TRUTH, and in this case, THE TRUTH OF THE BIBLE!Dr. Franklin, you are blatantly guilty of the following precept: “A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.” (Proverbs 18:2)DO YOU GET WHAT WAS PROPOSED ABOVE, OR DO YOU NEED A 1ST GRADER TO EXPLAIN IT TO YOU?
The Christian foundation belief is a FLAT EARTH COSMOLOGY, where we DO NOT have the option to say Jesus, as God incarnate, was wrong in his direct passages showing this to be true (Proverbs 30:5). This is how you continue to call Jesus a LIAR with your wishful thinking opinions that contradict God!!!
Key in this discussion is the firmament. The Hebrew word rāqîa‘ is translated as firmament in the King James Version. It appears a total of 17 times in the Old Testament, with over half of the occurrences (nine times) in chapter 1 of Genesis alone. The word is a noun that derives from the Hebrew root rq‘, meaning to stamp out.4 An example of this action is to stamp or pound a metal into thin sheets. This is a common practice with gold, because gold is so malleable. Gilding is the process of attaching gold leaf to objects, giving the impression that the objects are pure gold. For instance, the Ark of the Covenant was gilded with gold leaf over acacia wood (Exodus 25:10–11). Gold leaf can be pounded or rolled so thin that bright light can be seen through it. From the meaning of this word, we can deduce that the rāqîa‘ is something that has been pounded or stretched out.-https://answersingenesis.org/astronomy/earth/does-bible-teach-earth-flat/
YOUR ONE OF MANY UPON MANY STEPPING IN POO QUOTES, THIS TIME REGARDING DANIEL4:20: “Unfortunately, this is out of context the End of The Earth was taken out of context. It was a dream and not taken literally.”As if you aren't mortified enough because of your ignorance of Christianity, then with your bible ignorant statement above, and in your way of thinking, the Christian IS NOT to take Joseph’s dream as the proof for Jesus being conceived by the Holy Spirit! This is because, as you stated, it is a dream that Joseph had and therefore is not to be taken literally, along with following your additional intentions, then Jesus being conceived by the Holy Spirit becomes false! Where does your Christian stupidity end?“But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, 'Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins” (Matthew 1:20). Dr. Franklin, clean your shoes off again, where totally inept Christians like you are so predictable and easy to humiliate in the name of Jesus.
Furthermore, what part of this biblical axiom don't you understand? “It is he who sits ABOVE THE CIRCLE of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in;” (Isaiah 40:22). NOTE: If Isaiah wanted to call the earth a sphere or a globe, he could have easily done so because earlier he states that God will “roll you up tightly 'LIKE A BALL, and throw you into another country." (Isaiah 22:18). ISAIAH 40:22 = CIRCLE AND ISAIAH 22:18 = BALL EQUALING A GLOBE. Do you understand the simple logic behind this proposition???!
“ The carpenter stretches a line; he marks it out with a pencil. He shapes it with planes and marks it with a compass. He shapes it into the figure of a man, with the beauty of a man, to dwell in a house.” (Isaiah 44:13)
"to him, that he seeth not; and he walketh in the circuit of heaven.” (Job 22:14)
Proverbs 8:27: "I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth:"
Isaiah 40:22: "It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants that stretcheth out the heavens”
DR. FRANKLIN, AWAITING YOUR NEXT ATTEMPT AT GRASPING FOR MORE STRAWS AS YOU SHOW THAT JESUS IS A LIAR RELATIVE TO THE ACTUAL HISTORICITY OF OUR ANCIENT HEBREW FLAT EARTH AND OUR BIBLES COSMOLOGY BEGINNINGS. YOU DO PROVIDE A LOT OF LAUGHTER, AT YOUR EXPENSE, SO THANK YOU!
"1. THE ENTIRE WORD OF THE BIBLE IS INSPIRED BY JESUS AS GOD INCARNATE:“But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation, for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.” (2 Peter 1:20-21)"
"2. EVERY WORD OF JESUS IS FLAWLESS, THEREFORE TRUE:“Every word of God is flawless; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him.“ (Proverbs 30:5)"Response-Yes I now that however that does not fit your argument"3. CHRISTIANS ARE TO FOLLOW JESUS’ WORD TO THE LETTER:
Dr. Franklin, since it has been shown that your mind is now controlled by Satan, your outright ineptness cannot understand that when reading biblical scripture, it is very important to read it from an Ancient Hebrew perspective and not from your own modern Western viewpoint, GET IT? You continue to take a Satanic and deceiving anachronistic perspective upon the topic at hand, and you do thisto save what face you have left within religious discussions at DebateArt!
Therefore, in following the simple godly syllogism stated above, then it is Jesus as GOD INCARNATE giving the Christian flawless words of truth that the earth IS A CIRCLE , and therefore FLAT, where you are to accept this premise as fact! Do you want to call Jesus A LIAR ONCE AGAIN in this respect?!
“It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in;” (Isaiah 40:22)
“ The carpenter stretches a line; he marks it out with a pencil. He shapes it with planes and marks it with a compass. He shapes it into the figure of a man, with the beauty of a man, to dwell in a house.” (Isaiah 44:13)
If you want to play “word games” of the Hebrew language in biblical times, then the Hebrew word CHUWG describes a CIRCLE, and what was used in the passages above. Therefore, deducing it to its irreducable primary, the Hebrew word CHUWG refers to the earth, compass, or the vault of heaven as a CIRCLE! 2+2=4!
OMG, with you, I am dealing with a child mentality! It matters NOT if the two dreams were completely different stories because the outcome is the same! They were BOTH DREAMS where you stated before regarding Daniel: “It was a dream and not taken literally!” Therefore, at your embarrassment AGAIN, Joseph had a DREAM of Jesus being conceived by the Lord in Matthew 1:20, then when following your conclusion that a dream is not to be taken literally, then you are on record that Jesus’ concievement from the Lord does not count, therefore Jesus was not conceived by our Lord and it becomes FALSE!!! DO YOU UNDESTAND THIS LOGICAL CONCLUSION? DO WE NEED TO FIND A 1ST GRADER AGAIN TO EXPLAIN IT TO YOU?!
OMG, your ignorance has no bounds! If the earth were spherical like you Satanically propose against Jesus’ word within the scriptures, then one would use a verb other than "spread out" to describe its firmament, like "all balled up, gathered up, gathered together in a ball," anything but the term “spread out!” One might say they "spread out" batter to make pancakes but no one would ever say they "spread out" hamburger to make meatballs. GET IT? Huh? The earth in the Bible was "spread out" BECAUSE IT WAS FLAT as biblically shown ad infintum, period!
Dr. Franklin, you are obviously not aware of the ancient Hebrew Planatary System explicitly shown within the bible, where “OUTER SPACE” is not a part of it in any way! This is because the cosmology at the time was that the earth is in a geocentric form. The planets, moon, and sun, all stayed within the VAULT TOWARDS THE CEILING OF THE FIRMAMENT and rotated around the EDGE of the earth, as the link below shows!
Conduct
Con "sentenced" Pro to hell many times, called him satanic, and had many other insults. It was extremely distracting. It literally made it so I couldn't follow the arguments so I'm not even voting based on that.
"Furthermore, your debate title will come back and bite you in your Satanic ass"
" There will be no insidious pseudo-christian anachronistic spin doctoring, decoder rings, or crystal balls used in this debate to fallaciously try in vain to deviate from what"'
"Not known to the bible ignorant Dr. Franklin at this time"
So, the arguments are technical arguments based primarily on interpretation and translations of particular words.
The examples cited are the four corners of the globe, some basic references to turning the world upside down, a tree being visible, and the earth being a circle.
The four corners point is explained by pro through translation issues - and dropped by con who mostly just dismissed the point with a generic argument about speculation.
Some are dealt with by the example being a dream.
The final was the definition of circle potentially being a sphere. While con made a tentative attempt to argue this had a different translations pros case was pretty evidence that it could mean encompass.
Con did not present any clear and unambiguous example where the earth was flat - and largely drops pros entire case.
The rest of cons case was primarily ranting, that didn’t appear particular connected to the resolution or pros argument.
Arguments to con.
Conduct.
“Furthermore, your debate title will come back and bite you in your Satanic ass”
“DR. FRANKLIN, LET US BEGIN YOUR DEVIL SPEAK BLOODBATH:”
“Not known to the bible ignorant Dr. Franklin at this time”
“GET IT? MAYBE?”
“DO YOU NEED A 1ST GRADER TO EXPLAIN IT TO YOU?
“HELLO, ANYBODY HOME TODAY DR. FRANKLIN?! OBVIOUSLY NOT!”
Cons language and disrespect is frequent, repeated and odious throughout : the above was only a couple of examples from only the first two rounds.
Pro gets a bit tetchy at points which is understandable given the onslaught of insults and belittling - but never comes close to matching cons level of toxicity and disrespect.
As a result, cons clearly deserves the conduct penalty. Conduct to pro.
Conduct
Con repeatedly insulted Pro and called him Satanic. Here are a few examples:
Satanic Dr. Franklin, What is truly sad in your Satanic position...
After laughing at your minion of Satan pathetic
BUT, because of you being a minion of Satan, you are using your latest Satan Decoder Ring to erroneously rewrite that these millions of Christians were wrong in reading said passages as literally directly shown! This is laughter at its finest, and at your expense upon Judgment Day!
Dr. Franklin, I want you to burn this very simple syllogism into your feeble Satanic brain when I address your stupidity and ignorance of the Christian faith, understood Satan incarnate?!
This conduct was excessive, frequent, and repeatedly distracted me from the arguments that con was presenting. In contrast, Pro held himself up very well and overall had better conduct.
Suggestion for both of you: Please write your arguments in a word document and use better formatting. Wall of text and walls of quotes are difficult to read. I had a very difficult time in following your arguments. In the future, I recommend doing something like this:
C1: The Bible says....
C2: It also says...
Conclusion
You don't need to fully quote each other to respond to the arguments. Ragnar made a nice guide that I recommend you read: http://tiny.cc/DebateArt
That being said, I have to leave arguments as a tie. There were too many walls of text, too many unneeded quoting, too many unneeded bold and underlined text that made the arguments impossible to follow. Thus arguments are tied.
I'm willing to friend almost anybody on DART. It's why I have so many. Although I understand Brother D's logic a bit.
YOU DARE ME AND BROTHERD's FRIENDSHIP???
Look at this nonsense. You call this guy a christian and are friends with him? With friends like this, who needs enemies? Yall just trolls and supporting trolls.
No,slaughtering in the debating
He made death threats? That can get him in trouble.
But he is HILARIOUS
"So I'm going to slaughter you now since you didn't listen to me, Maybe you'll listen to someone else. If you don't take in these videos, That's not my problem. Btw, These professionals know one helluva lot more than you."
"Seasoned beating with my egg-pressed rectal itch and thermometer reading 136 degrees fahrenheit on the ballroom floor."
"chitty chitty bong bong your out"
https://www.debate.org/debates/Is-atheism-a-religion/7/
https://www.debate.org/debates/The-god-of-the-bible-does-not-exist/5/
I can see where backwarsden comes from, but his conduct is awful.
Hey..look at this guy--https://www.debate.org/backwardseden/
backwardseden is weird,so it makes sense, he wont switch
How would you know that? Maybe WOA vs BDT (Wisdom of Ags vs Brother D Thomas).
Done!
https://www.debate.org/debates/Things-that-Donald-toilet-dust-Trump-the-worst-president-of-all-time-and-god-have-in-common/1/
Backwardseden unfortunately wont switch
Oh yeah, that would be AWESOME, I would pay for that
Lets invite backwarsden from DDO so he debates Brother D Thomas. You know Mosc?
judge what is right not wrong were your verse BrotherDtard,
"DR. FRANKLIN, ITS TIME FOR YOU TO GO INTO HIDING AND WIPE THE EGG FROM YOUR FACE ONCE AGAIN! JESUS IS NOT SMILING IN YOUR BEHALF!"
Its the new backwardseden, and I love it
Yup,he might be Iconoclast
Dr.Franklin
I think we both know he's a troll, and his arguments make no sense.
BrotherDThomas
Chill with the Christ stuff, according to your own religion "Don't use his name in vain" or something. But chill...
HOW BOIIIII,EXPLAIN THYSELVES
.
Shhhhhhhhhhhh ...... go lick your wounds somewhere else, you are DONE!
.
Why didn't you respond to my love your enemies
.
Dr. Franklin,
YOUR REVEALING AND EMBARRASSING QUOTE: "To be honest, I dont care to read your long rants"
Conversely, to be honest, you can't read them and act upon them and remain intelligent looking in the aftermath. The said posts were regarding Christianity and the ramifications that TRUE Christians have to accept. Therefore, you were easily beaten in the comments section of this debate, therefore, run along and try to accept your "RUNAWAY" modus operandi in front of the members of DebateArt.
How utterly embarrassing for you once again.
.
To be honest, I dont care to read your long rants
.
This is so sad for Dr. Franklin, once again he RUNS AWAY from his ignorance and stupidity regarding Christianity relating to my posts #51, #49, #47, and #45, with yet another non sequitur #54 post of his as he tries in vain to grasp for the straws that are not even there anymore.
The "doc" have been easily defeated as explicitly shown in this comments section, and now has to resort to non sequiturs in his feeble attempt to regain a modicum of respect here on DebateArt. It is truly sad to watch.
.
EVIL SATANIC BROTHERDTHOMAS IS UNCHRISTIANLIKE
INSULTING IS AGAINST JESUS'S LAW
Matthew 5
[43] Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
[44] But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
[45] That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
[46] For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?
[47] And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?
JESUS SAYS TO LOVE YOUR ENEMIES BUT BROTHERDTMOMAS DOESN't SATANIC
.
Dr. Franklin,
YOUR NON SEQUITUR QUOTE: " your welcome"
Barring the FACT once again of your 1st grade reading comprehension with the word "your" instead of using "you're," you have shown DebateArt that you have thrown in the towel of DEFEAT because you cannot answer my posts of #51, #49, #47, and #45 !!!!
Good boy, even though it is embarrassing for you to GIVE UP on said posts of mine above, at least now you will try and accept in how dumbfounded you truly are regarding our Christian faith! Jesus is embarrassed for you as He shakes his head in disgust. :(
Thank you Dr. Franklin for at least "trying" to show us your knowledge upon our faith, where in discussion as shown, YOU HAVE NONE! LOL!
.
your welcome
.
Dr. Franklin,
YOUR REVEALING #46 BIBLE QUOTE ON JUDGING: “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you….”
First off, as your initial bible quote so states, I CAN JUDGE YOU, AND YOU CAN JUDGE ME BACK! Do you understand this simple biblical conclusion, or do I have to extend my bible class with you again? Huh?
YOUR TOTALLY EMBARRASSING QUOTE: “judging good deads is good,not judging in general”
SECOND TIME today, you meant “Deeds” and NOT “Deads,” please try and understand the english language when on DebateArt!
Then you dig your hole deeper by stating; “Judging in general isn’t good?” In your vain attempt to dig yourself out of the hole you dug again, you can actually state such a dumbfounded statement? Are you kidding us, or are you really this inept?
!!!! NEWS ALERT. !!!!
Dr. Franklin purports that ALL JUDGING IN GENERAL is not good anymore, therefore he proffers that ALL, and I repeat, ALL court proceedings in the USA should stop Judging in a jury setting post haste! Equally ignorant and dumbfounded friends of Dr. Franklin are to go out and shout this from the mountain tops of what Dr. Franklin has proposed, NO JUDGING IN GENERAL BECAUSE IT IS NOT GOOD!
Dr. Franklin, can you give me a break from you continually grasping for straws regarding our faith, and YOUR COMPLETE IGNORANCE UPON SIMPLE PROPOSITIONS, either from the bible, or in real life? Okay? Thank you.
.
FINALLY,YOU USED THE RECEIVER BAR. judging good deads is good,not judging in general
.
Dr. Franklin,
YOUR LAUGHABLE QUOTE: "Those verses talk about praising good deads."
First off, I am sure you meant "deeds" instead of "deads." Therefore, it matters not what the topic of judging is that Jesus stated, because it deduces to JUDGING!!! GET IT? HUH? MAYBE? YES? Therefore you weak refutation to Judging falls flat on its face! Now, like I said before, wipe the egg from your face AGAIN and try to regroup in front of the members of DebateArt, that is, if you can.
You continue to parade around DebateArt as if you actually know our Christian bible, when YOU DO NOT! 2+2=4!
.
Those verses talk about praising good deads. AND PLEASE USE THE RECEIVER BAR.
Dr. Franklin,
I do not understand in why you continue to show DebateArt your complete biblical ignorance!!!!!
Relative to your "judging" scenario where you state that we cannot judge, Jesus says that we can judge, you blatant fool! YOU CONTINUE TO SHOW EVERYONE THAT YOU DO NOT READ OUR CHRISTIAN BIBLE WHICH EQUALS BLASPHEME!
Jesus has told mankind to judge righteous judgment as he told a man "Thou hast rightly judged" (Luke 7:43), and the most important judging verse is when Jesus told others; "Why even of yourselves judge ye not what is right?" (Luke 12:57). Remember the Lord Jesus Christ commanded, "Judge righteous judgment" (John 7:24).
THINK; tell the people on court juries throughout the land not to judge others, GET IT?! Jesus' inspired words say WE CAN JUDGE, therefore, do you want to call Jesus a LIAR in this respect? NO? I didn’t think so!
DR. FRANKLIN, ITS TIME FOR YOU TO GO INTO HIDING AND WIPE THE EGG FROM YOUR FACE ONCE AGAIN! JESUS IS NOT SMILING IN YOUR BEHALF!
.
Well you cant call people names, thats against Jesus
1 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. 2 For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. 3 “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? 4 How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? 5 You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.
See Matthew 7 says not to judge, so stop it if I disagree with you
.
Dr. Franklin,
Doc, as you are aware, I really don't care if points are taken off because of calling you what you are, and that is an inept fake Christian, because Jesus acted in the same manner of calling a spade a spade, even if He were at a Black Lives Matter rally today!
Jesus provided me with the way TRUE Christians like myself are to handle fake Christians like you, as explicitly shown in a few of the many passages attributed to Him upon this topic, and as shown below, praise!
“When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. SO HE MADE A WHIP OUT OF CORDS, AND DROVE ALL FROM THE TEMPLE COURTS both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. To those who sold doves he said, “GET THESE OUT OF HERE! STOP TURNING MY FATHERS HOUSE INTO A MARKET!” (John 2:13-16)
“I tell you that everyone who has will be given more; but the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him. And these enemies of mine who were unwilling for me to rule over them, BRING THEM HERE AND SLAY THEM THEM IN FRONT OF ME. After Jesus had said this, He went on ahead, going up to Jerusalem.….” ( Luke 19:26-28)
As we happily have to agree, our Jesus is a man's man for sure and doesn't take any crap from no one! PRAISE!
.
"CONGRATULATIONS DR. FRANKLIN !!!!"
THANK YOU BROTHERDTHOMAS HOW NICE
Your conduct is HOURNEDOUS
"DR. FRANKLIN, LET US BEGIN YOUR DEVIL SPEAK BLOODBATH:"
.
Dr. Franklin,
CONGRATULATIONS DR. FRANKLIN !!!!
First off, you don’t want to display the conduct of what your voters are allegedly against, and erroneously gave you points for not doing, but you did anyway, like your disparaging statements below, okay? HELLO?! LOL!
“This guy is an idiot”
“Hah, look who won Dumbass”
NOT GOD OR JESUS.STRIKE 3 YOUR OUT!!
5 STRIKES AND YOUR MEGA OUT!!!!!
Dr.Franklin
Added: 1 day ago
--> @BrotherDThomas
Satanic BrotherDThomas,
what the fuck is the matter with you. She was just outlying what she will do for the debate.
https://www.debateart.com/debates/913
Dr.Franklin
Added: 21 hours ago
--> @BrotherDThomas
lol, I am debating you and destroying you. Your arguments are horrible
https://www.debateart.com/debates/956
Dr.Franklin
Added: 3 days ago
--> @BrotherDThomas
Fucking retard, he was removing a vote
https://www.debateart.com/debates/956
Dr.Franklin
Added: 1 day ago
--> @BrotherDThomas
Satanic BrotherDThomas,
what the fuck is the matter with you. She was just outlying what she will do for the debate.
https://www.debateart.com/debates/913
Now that it has been proven by your voters, ALL THREE OF THEM, that hearsay, wishful thinking and opinions of yourself and others are fair game in a debate, Jesus and I will STILL USE ACTUAL PROVABLE FACTS!
What is still comical, is the FACT that you and others DO NOT take into account the historicity of the biblical era where the earth was considered FLAT as a pancake, but instead, deceivingly take their ignorant anachronistic approach to this topic. Kids nothing but kids.
Subjectively, and as one of many faux pas’ of yours, your total EMBARRASSMENT by using the Hebrew word for FLAT circle of “cugh" was priceless that was NEVER USED within the bible, which should have removed 21 POINTS from your total! Whereas, I had to correct you AGAIN to provide the true word “chuwg” for FLAT circle in the Strong’s Concordance!
BrOtHErDThOMas
You should make a new debate that says
"The Earth Is Round says Atheists"
Like religion has to do with a round Earth
Hah, look who won Dumbass
thx for the vote
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Debater445 // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 4 points to pro for arguments and conduct. 2 points to con for sources
>Reason for Decision: Pro's arguments were better. Con did read the bible more thoroughly, and found more evidence, but Pro debunked it. Both had equal spelling and grammar. Con was far too rude and insulting, while Pro was as polite as possible, so of course he gets a point for best conduct.
>Reason for Mod Action: The voter is not eligable to vote. A voter must have 2 completed non troll / non forfeit debates, or 100 forum comments and have read the code of conduct in order to vote.
That being said. The vote would also have been removed were this not the case as arguments, conduct S&G are insufficiently explained.
To award arguments, the voter must (1) survey the main arguments and counterarguments in the debate, (2) weigh those arguments and counterarguments against each other, and (3) explain, based on the weighing process, how they reached their decision.
To award sources points, the voter must (1) explain how the debaters' sources impacted the debate, (2) directly assess the strength/utility of at least one source in particular cited in the debate, and (3) explain how and why one debater's use of sources overall was superior to the other's.
To award conduct points, the voter must (1) identify specific instances of misconduct, (2) explain how this misconduct was excessive, unfair, or in breach of the debate's rules, and (3) compare each debater's conduct.
*******************************************************************
I can't stand fake people
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Club // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 3 points to pro for sources and conduct.
>Reason for Decision: Lol
So, Dr.Franklin had better sources because he used multiple unlike Mr, BRoThERd Thomas
BrotherDThomas also stated that DF was "Satanic" in some way.
>Reason for Mod Action: The does not sufficiently explaining any of the key points awarded.
To award sources points, the voter must (1) explain how the debaters' sources impacted the debate, (2) directly assess the strength/utility of at least one source in particular cited in the debate, and (3) explain how and why one debater's use of sources overall was superior to the other's.
To award conduct points, the voter must (1) identify specific instances of misconduct, (2) explain how this misconduct was excessive, unfair, or in breach of the debate's rules, and (3) compare each debater's conduct.
*******************************************************************
No im asking people to vote
.
Dr. Franklin,
LOOK AT YOU!!! You are crying like a little baby and pleading with others in a prejudiced manner, “Please vote for me,” CAN SOMEONE VOTE PLEASE!” How utterly embarrassing for you in front of the members of DebateArt! The members that you are pleading with seemingly have your back in voting for you in a totally biased way, which therefore makes them as ignorant as you are because they don’t care as well about BIBLE FACTS, and the HISTORICITY of our Christianity. Laughable!
You based your entire debate upon Wishful Thinking, Opinions, not using Strong’s Concordance with your bible passages, especially where you used the wrong word for “circle,” that comically fell flat upon its face. Then if the above disconcertments weren’t embarrassing enough for you, your deceiving anachronistic ways prevented you from actually knowing the TRUE historicity of our faith in the Bronze, Iron, and MIddle Ages, that believed in a FLAT EARTH, along with a PTOLEMAIC GEOCENTRIC PLANETARY SYSTEM UP UNTIL 1600AD, and as explicitly shown within the bible, makes you the continued fool, period!
Whether you like it or not, or accept it, the following link is what our biblical Hebrews believed regarding earth in the aforementioned periods of time.
https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-ded83b54de63777d8481fd176670a9e9
Dr. Franklin, you are guilty of so many inspired passages by Jesus, that I can hardly keep count of them! Nonetheless, here are a few of the standouts that you will have to answer upon your Judgment Day:
“Every word of God proves true; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, lest he rebuke you and you be found a liar.” (Proverbs 30: 5-6)
“EVERY word of God is flawless; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him.“ (Proverbs 30:5)
A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.” (Proverbs 18:2)
.
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Virtuoso// Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 1 points to pro for conduct.
>Reason for Decision: See vote.
>Reason for Mod Action: The vote was found to be sufficient as per thesite policy.
*******************************************************************
It is on my Radar, don’t worry.
I gotchu
vote plz
CAN SOMEONE VOTE!!!PLEASE
.
Virtuoso,
YOUR QUOTE: "All of Con's argument was insulting the Pro and saying how he's "lying about Jesus".
You are correct! The TRUTH hurts sometimes, and in the case of the Satanic Dr. Franklin, I have shown him to call Jesus a LIAR throughout the debate with his ever so weak arguments of "well, it could mean this or that" instead of actual peered reviewed FACTS and biblical precepts through Strongs Concordance.
Dr. Franklin anachronistically puts todays Satanic science back into the Bible where it does NOT belong! Therefore he will pay upon Judgment Day; "I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book" (Revelation 22:18-19)
.
Virtuoso,
YOUR QUOTE: "Con's argument is self-contradictory, stating both that the earth is a circle and that it has four corners, which is geometrically impossible. Arguments to Pro"
I am the messenger of the Judeo-Christian bible in what it proposes, and in this case as YOU being a member of Judaism, "YOUR" god, Yahweh, and "MY" God Jesus, stated that our earth has 4 corners and is FLAT, and at the same time, it is a FLAT circle, as I have shown correctly from the Strongs Concordance, whereas Mr. Satan, Dr. Franklin, used erroneous words of a circle to try and save face again.
Therefore, our Gods are CONTRADICTORY, not me when I bring forth the historicity of our faiths.
.
the Bible states that the earth has 4 corners, AND, it states that it is a FLAT earth. "YOUR" god, Yahweh, and "MY" God