Black Lives Matter brainwashes peoples' minds to make them hate whites.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
To achieve these goals they focus only on cases of black men killed by the police.
61% of them are white men. 32% are black males.
Black men are not killed out of proportion when you consider they’re much more likely to interact with police.
People are killed by police about as often as they’re struck by lightning but I don’t see many protests about storms.
- "Black on black crime and white on white crime." Irrelevant
- "Black men committing 52% of all the murders." - Irrelevant
- "Black children raised without fathers" - Irrelevant
Black Lives Matter tries to turn young men like Michael Brown and Jamar Clark into martyrs but these guys aren’t angels.
Incited riots, inspired shootings of police, and correlated with an astounding and deadly increase in violent crime in America’s major cities?
Does the BLM make the black people aware that 90% of black people killed are by the hands of other black people? No.
Does the BLM tell the black people that 74% of black children grow without fathers because they are born out of wedlock? Does it do anything to stop that?
Does the BLM tell the black people that black kids are not graduating out of high school and dropping out? Does the BLM do anything to change that?
Does the BLM tell the black people that blacks are 6.5% of the US population and yet commit 40% of the murders? No.
If the problem with blacks is because of their race and not their culture,then why did the single motherhood rate of the black community jump from 20% to 70%? Does the BLM do anything to stop that? No.
The BLM has a simple agenda: Ignoring the real problems of the black community and shifting the focus to hating white people. They blame all their problems on racism. The reason they can't get a job or education is not because they are a bunch of self-entitled babies who think everything should be handed to them on a silver platter,but because of racism. Everything wrong with them is racism. Nothing is their own fault.
If black people mattered to BLM, they would be trying to confront these issues, instead of making up a fantasy demon called "racism" and pitting the blacks against whites.
Does slavery exist anymore? No.
What are you trying to prove by posting definitions of BLM and "police brutality"? Just because you believe in something doesn't mean it exists. According to the FBI,there are less than 400 deaths a year through cop murder. 61% are whites,32% are blacks. I am failing to see the "brutality" here.
Loose characters and morals in the black community,more black children being born out of wedlock, 90% of blacks killed by blacks,blacks dropping out of high school,etc. These are issues that should be tackled and solved instead of focusing on a fantasy monster called "racism".
What's the brutality here? Where's the trigger happy people?
Loose morals and bad culture.
The BLM has brainwashed your mind by teaching you a word which doesn't mean anything: police brutality. The problem is not racism,but bad culture. 74% of black children are born out of wedlock and are raised without fathers. Don't you think that impacts their childhood at all? Don't you think that may be one of the reasons of their badupbringing? What does the BLM do to combat that? Nothing,because it's too busy to fight the imaginary monster called "police brutality".
Even black people themselves admit that black-on black crime is a bigger problem than racism. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
As the above link shows,white people are killed by police more or less the same as black people. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
The above link is the link which shows that 90% of blacks are killed by other blacks,not police. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
The BLM is brainwashing black people and teaching them not to focus on bettering their lives and improving their character,instead just blame it on the police and the white man.
Well....black people are being judged by the content of their character......
When they have children out of wedlock,drop out of schools,indulge in shootings and commit riots.
Well,if you dealt with black-on-black crime instead of being paranoid about what non-blacks would say,you would have dealt with that issue long ago. This actually has a lot to do with BLM because it claims to stand for black lives and yet never protects them from their biggest threats........black people themselves.
Also,of course,white on white crime exists. Nobody denies it,even though black-on-black crime is significantly higher than white-on-white crime. We don't ignore it and blame it on "racism". We find out ways to defend ourselves. We buy guns,train using them and then use them for our defense. The problem with BLM is that they don't do anything to combat black-on-black crime. They instead blame the white man for everything,which proves that Black Lives don't matter to Black Lives Matter.
2. "DADDY ISSUES"
So,as I expected,you spew out rhetoric without any facts. Almost every sentence in your 1st argument is a lie. Let's start:
Black kids growing up without fathers has not been happening for a very long time. You'll be shocked to know that under the Jim Crow laws and the 1960s,the number of black children growing up without fathers was 22%. Still high,but microscopic compared to the 59% in 1980 and the 57.6% now. Only a loss in character and morals can explain that. (Popenoe, David. Life Without Father (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996), 23.)
The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites. As of today,the rate of black fathers leaving their kids is 48.5%,those of Hispanics 26.3% and those of whites 18.3%. (US Census Bureau, “Living Arrangements of Children Under 18”: Tables –CH-2, CH-3, CH-4. 1960 – Present. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.)
"BLM has nothing to do with this." Oh,that's right,I forgot. Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
3. "SCHOOL IS FOR THE BIRDS"
Another lie. A noble lie,but a lie all the same.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-mar-24-me-graduate24-story.html
The above link show studies conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute which shows nearly half of the Latino and African American students who should have graduated from California high schools in 2002 failed to complete their education. Just 57% of African Americans and 60% of Latinos graduated in 2002, compared with 78% of whites and 84% of Asians. Now,this is just for only one state. One can only imagine about the rest of the country. People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.
"BLM has nothing to do with this." Oh,that's right,I forgot once again. Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
4. "MURDER? I'M BLACK,YOU RACIST!"
Again,as expected,you labeled proven facts of the FBI about blacks committing the most amount of murders as "racism agenda and stereotypes". The dropping out of high school and born out of wedlock are actually true,as I proved above with FACTS. It's very relevant as it shows how the BLM cares SO MUCH about the black lives lost in those cases,and how it is doing SO MUCH to help them. Also,according to the same WASHINGTON POST whose sources you posted,mass shootings account for a tiny amount of deaths in the USA.
How about riots? Be it Rodney King,Ferguson,Milwaukee,Chicago riots,every major riot in this country has been instigated by BLM,who believe violence is the answer when it should not even be a question.
5. "YOU'RE RACIST IF YOU CRITICIZE BLACKS,BUT YOU'RE EMPOWERING IF YOU CRITICIZE WHITES"
You just now admitted that there is hatred of white people among BLM. You literally wrote that in your 4th point. So,because some people used to keep slaves in the past,then that means that their sons and daughters should undergo the hate and revenge? Glad you cleared that up. Of course,it matters that America is not as racist as it was in the 1960s. It shows that the civil rights movement has reached so high to stop racism without the BLM's frantic efforts to revive it.
I already proved that blacks are dropping out of high school in higher rates than whites above with FACTS,which some BLM activists call "STEREOTYPE".
The idea that black people in the United States are disproportionately poor because America is racist; that’s just not true, at least not in terms of America’s racism today keeping black people down. It’s just not the case. If that were the case then you’d have to look at group income, and decide based on group income who’s been victimized the most, and who the country was built for. By that standard, the country was built by Asians, because the racial group with the highest median income in the United States is Asians. The Constitution was not written by a bunch of people who speak Korean. Because the Constitution is a document of freedom, not a document of ethnicity.
So here are the three rules. You want to be rich in America; you want to do well in America? Put aside the whining about the system.
According to the Brookings Institute, 2% of Americans who followed these rules are in poverty. 75% have joined the middle class. What about racism? 71% of poor families with children are unmarried. The poverty rate among non-married white families was 22% in 2008; that same year the poverty rate among black married couples was less than 7%.
But what happened to racism? Why weren’t those black married couples poorer than the single white moms? Because it doesn’t have to do with color; it has to do with life decisions.
Well,shouldn't the BLM be concerned about the single motherhood rate? Couldn't the BLM decide solutions about that? Couldn't BLM make black people aware of that?
Oh,that's right,I forgot once again. WHAT IN GOD'S NAME IS THE MATTER WITH ME? Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
6. "IT MUST BE THE WHITE SUPREMACY"
Nobody denies it,even though black-on-black crime is significantly higher than white-on-white crime. We don't ignore it and blame it on "racism"
The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites.
People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.
The dropping out of high school and born out of wedlock are actually true,as I proved above with FACTS.
It shows that the civil rights movement has reached so high to stop racism without the BLM's frantic efforts to revive it.
Well,shouldn't the BLM be concerned about the single motherhood rate? Couldn't the BLM decide solutions about that? Couldn't BLM make black people aware of that?
You automatically assume someone to be privileged because he has a particular skin color. THAT is racist.
Also,I would like to point out that this is the intellectual capacity of the Left. If you ask them for proof of institutionalized racism,their answer would be,"FUCK TRUMP,RACISM EXISTS. I DON'T HAVE TO POST EVIDENCE."
Blacks are not TARGETED as much as whites are TARGETED.
The BLM invents those words to corrupt your minds and make you hate whites.
The amount of whites born out of wedlock,or dropping out of high schools,or growing up without fathers is significantly lower than blacks.
The BLM doesn't care about black lives,only those BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION. They brainwash you and other blacks that the other problems are not problems,only BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION are problems,and for all of that,the white man is to blame. No facts. No evidence. Just the fault of the white man.
And since, Martin Luther King was the one who said that,he was a racist,was he?
Forty-three-year-old Willie Smith Ward was convicted and sentenced on robbery charges Wednesday, May 29. The Waco Tribune-Herald reports that Ward also threatened a grocery store employee who tried to stop him from stealing the rack of pork ribs in 2011.
The jury recommended Ward be sentenced as a habitual criminal. Ward has previous felony convictions for burglary, attempted robbery, aggravated assault, leaving the scene of an accident and possession of cocaine, and four misdemeanor convictions, including two thefts.
I have grouped Pros arguments
1.Black Lives Matter doesn’t address main black issues
I have grouped Cons arguments
1.BLM’s true purpose is as he explains:”it's a pro black movement. We aren't saying that black lives are more meaningful than everyone else's, we are saying black lives are just as meaningful as everyone else's. The BLM movement isn't about separation, segregation or disengagement. The BLM movement is about a positive resolution.”
Both sides made strong claims with facts and evidence. The deciding factor will be the rebuttals.
Case 1: Black issues in communities-King claims-”"dropping out of high school" and "growing up without a father" are stereotypes and simply irrelevant. Has nothing to do with BLM..”
Where Pro responds-”Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES.” Pro is able to back it up with facts and sources like-”The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites. As of today,the rate of black fathers leaving their kids is 48.5%,those of Hispanics 26.3% and those of whites 18.3%. (US Census Bureau, “Living Arrangements of Children Under 18”: Tables –CH-2, CH-3, CH-4. 1960 – Present. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.)”and “The above link show studies conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute which shows nearly half of the Latino and African American students who should have graduated from California high schools in 2002 failed to complete their education. Just 57% of African Americans and 60% of Latinos graduated in 2002, compared with 78% of whites and 84% of Asians. Now,this is just for only one state. One can only imagine about the rest of the country. People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.”
Next round rebuttals were the same shit.Con responds-”Can't be helped. Parental issues has nothing to do with BLM. I think your white privilege card declined.”
Doesn’t address the facts nor backs up claims of white privilege. Another problem with Con is that he tries to paint Pro as using his “white privilege” but only uses on incident to back up his claim.
Pro responds:”I posted a study conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute that showed nearly half of the black students drop out whereas only 7 to 8% of whites do so. Is that personal choice or white privilege? If it is white privilege,explain how. Oh,sorry,sorry,as you said in the comments,it's because the sky is blue. I get it. My bad.” Facts and Logic
Con also cherry-picked situations, such as the two cases and what-if situations.
Arguments-Pro
Sources-Tie
S&P-Tie
Conduct-Pro wins, Con used poor conduct
" Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
""you're a racist cunt"
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
"fuck you bitch"
Con said a number of things that had poor conduct. Arguments are tied because both sides made good points, I was leaning towards pro, but decided his points were not enough to give him the arugements, as both sides in this debate were sort of a mess.
"bitch"
"fuck you bitch"
"classic case of white supremacy"
"classic case of white privilege"----pro's not even white lmao
"The police are the trigger happy people"
"Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
"you're a racist cunt"---which doesn't even make sense since Pro is not even white lmao
"MLK is racist"
So, the resolution here seems pretty clear; pro needs to show that BLM is systemically dishonest, and promotes a narrative of white hating.
Pros ENTIRE case here, is to throw an unending list of statistics, then assert that as a result of these; that BLM is brainwashing people to hate whites.
Even if I buy every specific thing pro says, he presents no evidence BLM brainwashes people to hate whites. At the very best, pros case is that BLM protesting police brutality and systemic racism is misguided, which falls way short of the rhetorical bar he set for himself.
Con correctly points out that the majority of these statistics raised are irrelevant; I side with him, though I think he could have elaborated on why better than he did.
It seems illogical to object to the validity of BLM protesting one particular type of injustice simply because there are more substantial matters at stake - this is prima facia absurd: For example, if I was punched in the face, and lost my job: it would be valid for me to be angry about both: as just because I object in public about one doesn’t mean I am disinterested about the other. Without pro doing more here, I cannot accept these branches of arguments.
Even were I to lower the bar pro sets for himself, to be whether BLM is justified or not, in terms of whether the issues of police brutality exist or are justified.
Con throws out multiple examples of clearly outrageous police killings of unarmed black people. That there are multiple explained police murders; and pros stats also show black individuals are killed disproportionally to their population: this puts me firmly down on cons side on this one.
The remaining issue I have with pros case is touched upon by con.
Pros entire case is implying correlation is causation. He argues that there is a lack of male role models due to single parenthood, that blacks commit more murders.
Why?
I have two options.
First that there is some systemic racism that drove these trends which may or may not now be self fulfilling, which con hints at on a couple of occasions reviewing the historical trends after Jim Crow.
Second , that it’s all solely black peoples fault, that they’re more likely to be murders, criminals and delinquent fathers because they’re black. Pro doesn’t come right out and say this, he blames “black culture”. But the insinuation appears there throughout the whole debate. Not only is there a clear value judgement being made, but the implication being made appears to be as con states “villainizing black people.”
The default position here is CLEARLY not to pressupose that black people are now criminal solely down to themselves given some of the history and issues. On points out, so even in this case pro doesn’t meet his burden, and quite frankly, renders his entire case particularly odious.
In terms of cons case: the main aspect that won it was very much on his demonstration that unarmed blacks are killed frequently. For me, in combination with pros lack of overall warrant wins this. His points 7,8 and 9 were particularly well reasoned.
The remaining points surrounding issues that blacks have to deal with but whites are not are particularly reasonable, and lends themselves well to calls of systemic racism. Pro doesn’t appear to address any of them.
From this position, the debate rapidly degenerated, with tropes and insults from both sides.
In general, pro loses on overall resolution and warrant as covered above: there was much more focus on rhetoric and odious insinuation from statistics than there was a legitimate attempt to engage in the points. The information con added in relation to specific cases was enough to show the basic premises of BLM are valid, and the issues he raised does imply systemic Racism.
I feel con could very much have obliterated pros case from round 1, had taken a step back and dealt head on with the points raised: but given the above, he does enough to win the resolution.
Arguments to con.
Conduct: I’m tying this, as there was clearly instigation and insults being hurled from both sides.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate
POOR CONDUCT:
Con had the worst debate conduct I've ever seen on this website in a long time. Throughout the entire debate, Con insulted and had a condescending attitude with pro, CUE THE MONTAGE.
" You just want to pull out your white privilege card. "
" No, MLK was not a racist, but you are. "
" Again with the "what-if" scenarios. Nobody has time for that crap."
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
" Oh shut up you are the one with loose morals and loss of character "
And my personal FAVORITE!
" Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
This obnoxious behavior has cost Con their conduct point.
I ask for other voters to consider this as well when voting
Neither convinced me of their side as neither exactly had good sources nor analysis to back up their claims. And both had good spelling and grammar.
>>Shut the fuck up
Thanks for proving my point which will remain true until you contend it..."Yet you have no evidence to prove it...typical libtard cant back up anything with facts"
>>That is not what I am saying.
You literally said "Most white people are racist. That's like explaining why the sky is blue and why the grass is green."
I responded by saying the exact opposite..."Well according to you I can just say a group is racist w/out any evidence and its a universal fact like green grass."
I am white.
How is Trump racist? Why would he give a 1 million dollar prize to a black? Why would he appoint multiple blacks do his cabinet? Why are his policies continuing to make black unemployment go down to record lows? Why has he made so many blacks off food stamps? Why do so many blacks support him? Because they know he isn't racist and Trump is helping, not hurting them.
Your continued lack of any evidence and resorting to insults prove my profile picture about many liberals..."Facts don't care about your feelings."
"Yet you have no evidence to prove it...typical libtard cant back up anything with facts"
Shut the fuck up
"Well according to you I can just say a group is racist w/out any evidence and its a universal fact like green grass."
That is not what I am saying.
So are you black or white? You said "You are actually being racist towards me by assuming I am privileged just by the melanin in my skin" which assumes that you are black and before that you said "Me nor any white person" assuming you are white
>>They are racist though
Yet you have no evidence to prove it...typical libtard cant back up anything with facts
>>Funniest thing I've ever heard.
Well according to you I can just say a group is racist w/out any evidence and its a universal fact like green grass.
"If he did, it was in the 1960's! Where the civil rights act had just been passed and there was a culture of that."
Not an excuse
"Then you can't prove most white people are racist."
They are racist though
"a very small minority though."
bullshit
I assumed you were white from when you said "Me nor any white person I know"
When I said "or being called "dirty" because of your melanin." I just used it as an example for in general, I wasn't specifically targeting you. I'm saying white people like you don't have to worry about being called dirty because of your melanin (that you don't have)
"You are actually being racist towards me by assuming I am privileged just by the melanin in my skin." I guess you are black then? Oops. I wasn't trying to be racist. I am black. I was saying there was no privilege of having melanin since it gets made fun by white people.
"By the way there is systemic racism towards whites because most black people are racist" Funniest thing I've ever heard. Yes, white lives do matter. Black lives matter too. BLM movement means black lives matter too, not black lives matter only.
If he did, it was in the 1960's! Where the civil rights act had just been passed and there was a culture of that.
>>I don't need evidence.
Then you can't prove most white people are racist.
>> Stop living in delusion and stop acting innocent. Typical white privilege. You talk as if there is no racist white person. I've come across a lot of racist white people online and in real life. Absurd accusation? Oh please. You don't have to worry about being called monkeys or being called "dirty" because of your melanin.
Of course there are racist white people, a very small minority though. If you claim systemic racist you have to point to a specific institution that systemically oppresses blacks. You claimed most white people are racist, which you literally can't back up with any evidence whatsoever. You are actually being racist towards me by assuming I am privileged just by the melanin in my skin.
By the way there is systemic racism towards whites because most black people are racist. White lives matter!
I feel like using Speedrace cause he made a good argument. "Trump racially discriminated against black people in his apartment building."
I don't need evidence. Stop living in delusion and stop acting innocent. Typical white privilege. You talk as if there is no racist white person. I've come across a lot of racist white people online and in real life. Absurd accusation? Oh please. You don't have to worry about being called monkeys or being called "dirty" because of your melanin.
"We are passed the civil rights and slavery."
You don't have to get told to get over slavery. Classic case of white privilege.
Don't use another person's argument, think for yourself. Tell me something he did that's racist.
"It's quite obvious. But I won't entertain your nonsense. That's like explaining why the sky is blue and why the grass is green."
So you have no evidence of an institution that is racist and arbitrarily decide what is racist. Typical left, I'm not surprised. Me nor any white person I know is racist, and that is such an absurd accusation that you throw around. We are passed the civil rights and slavery.
"How is Trump racist?"
https://www.debateart.com/debates/951
Look at Speedrace argument. Proof. I cuss, deal with it.
"How can you prove most white people are racist?"
It's quite obvious. But I won't entertain your nonsense. That's like explaining why the sky is blue and why the grass is green.
How is Trump racist? Why would he give a 1 million dollar prize to a black? Why would he appoint multiple blacks do his cabinet? Why are his policies continuing to make black unemployment go down to record lows? Why has he made so many blacks off food stamps? Why do so many blacks support him? Because they know he isn't racist and Trump is helping, not hurting them.
>>Fuck Trump, there is proof of him being racist to blacks. Look it up.
I see no evidence. Prove it. Cussing is not an argument.
>>Most white people.
Again this is not institutional racism. How can you prove most white people are racist?
Thank you, she is a bright woman and I thank you that you respect consverative blacks. A lot of times that doesn't happen. happy we could come on good terms.
I watched the video. She's a bright woman.
Interesting
Also, democrats called Kanye a token negro
Because Democrats do not motivate blacks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a3-Z73gIHY
Why not
You should NOT.
Interesting. By the way I'm on the democratic side
Lets apply your logic
Fuck democrats, there are proof of them being racist.Look it up
See, if huge parties can change, I think ONE person can
There are countless of examples in my R2 in this debate. Check it out.
"Which white people? All white people? Systemic racism is institutional. What institution is racist?" Most white people.
Fuck Trump, there is proof of him being racist to blacks. Look it up.
Give me an example
>>White people. Did you not pay attention to the debate? The proof is in the pudding.
Which white people? All white people? Systemic racism is institutional. What institution is racist?
>>I do listen to my people, but I'm not sure if I can look into someone who supports Trump who is racist towards black people.
Trump's approval rating is 4 points higher than his election among blacks at 12%. It was higher than Romney's. So you only listen to people who agree with you. Can't say I'm surprised.
How is Trump racist? Why would he give a 1 million dollar prize to a black? Why would he appoint multiple blacks do his cabinet? Why are his policies continuing to make black unemployment go down to record lows? Why has he made so many blacks off food stamps? Why do so many blacks support him? Because they know he isn't racist and Trump is helping, not hurting them.
Because he/she generalized black people.
Why
"Don't generalize a race"
Try telling Pro that.
"White people"
Nope, democrats. Not white people because Lincoln was white and republicans who were not the racist ones. Don't generalize a race.
Interesting.
I'm not playing the victim, this is definitely not a minute problem and I know exactly what to do for myself.
"Give me one example of a large group that systemically oppresses blacks."
White people. Did you not pay attention to the debate? The proof is in the pudding.
I don't need evidence for racism when it's still here today. If you want to live in delusion and claim racism is "not a big deal" then alright.
I do listen to my people, but I'm not sure if I can look into someone who supports Trump who is racist towards black people.
"Why are so many blacks for trump"
First off, it shouldn't be "so many" and if so, then that's sad. If they are somehow for him then, I don't know why, beats me.
>>1. Blacks are in fact victims.
You are playing the victim card and not thinking of what you can do for yourself rather than take the easy way out in an extremely minute problem.
>>2. There is no systematic racism? Haha....what planet are you from?
Give me one example of a large group that systemically oppresses blacks.
>>3. Racism is a tiny problem? Lmfao
Yes, America is barely a racist country. You have no evidence. Compared to all the black community problems, you choose to focus on a couple black on white shootings and use it for an example that blacks are SOOO oppressed.
>>4. Candace Owens....she's for Trump...she is against BLM...and is against Democratic Party...you're telling me to listen to someone like that? What a joke.
She was a democratic until she thought for herself a BLACK WOMEN instead of falling into the black victim cult. A black women highly against playing the victim, and provides much insight for blacks. Shouldn't you listen to your people? Why are so many blacks for Trump?
Well you should listen to Candace Owens, it was Democrats who had black unemployment at all-time high, but it was Republicans who had black unemployment at an all-time low.
Interesting.
1. Blacks are in fact victims.
2. There is no systematic racism? Haha....what planet are you from?
3. Racism is a tiny problem? Lmfao
4. Candace Owens....she's for Trump...she is against BLM...and is against Democratic Party...you're telling me to listen to someone like that? What a joke.
Was a national emergency declared at any republican-based group riot?
Typical leftists always claiming blacks are victims. There is no systemic racism. Stop playing the victim and figure you black problems out. Racism is such a tiny problem and you don't focus on the bigger problems within the black communities. Listen to Candace Owens.
>>Do you? You call 4 riots that took place anecdotes?
How many BLM protests have taken place? Find that number out then compare it to 4.
>>That shows your position. People murdered by blacks in revenge in mass numbers are anecdotes. But if a black man gets killed,it's somehow "police brutality".
Don't know what to call this. I'll go with an attack but more importantly added really nothing.
Do you? You call 4 riots that took place anecdotes? That shows your position. People murdered by blacks in revenge in mass numbers are anecdotes. But if a black man gets killed,it's somehow "police brutality".
>>If its a minority, WHY is that EVERYWHERE BLM goes, violence follows. It's not hard. Why is it not the same for other parties?
Evidence?
Do you have a source where they have analysed every single BLM protest and have found this to be the case or is this your opinion?
You must be Franklin from DDO. Interesting.
>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter#cite_note-263
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter#cite_note-comey-269
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter#cite_note-271
The Ferguson riots,Milwaukee riots,Chicago shootings were all peaceful? Yeah,right.
I am getting 4 anecdotes from this. Do you have actual evidence or is this it?
" But with the constant killings of blacks, a limit will be reached again and again. "
But why should it be like that? The entire history of black lynchings is six MONTHS of black on black crime. It hurts YOUR OWN PEOPLE. You guys are done because only 37% of blacks support BLM now.
I know, if the tea party was like this, oh boy get ready for the MSM storm. But no, because BLM is for a good cause. Get out of here. Enemy of the People
This Shaun King guy who is one of their leaders, isn't even black.
As I said If Black Lives Matter were conservative, it would already be one of the most discredited and despised movements in American history. Can you imagine the elite Left’s reaction to a conservative movement built on a founding lie that has incited riots, inspired shootings of police, and correlated with an astounding and deadly increase in violent crime in America’s major cities?
If its a minority, WHY is that EVERYWHERE BLM goes, violence follows. It's not hard. Why is it not the same for other parties?
I AGREE SO MUCH, it's not even funny. BLM is a hate organization. One of the founders is on the FBI's MOST WANTED terrorist LIST.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter#cite_note-263
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter#cite_note-comey-269
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter#cite_note-271
The Ferguson riots,Milwaukee riots,Chicago shootings were all peaceful? Yeah,right.
Basically said BLM commit vandalism disregarding the majority of peaceful protests.
What does that even mean?
Pretty much conflated the BLM movement being a vandalism group. Representatives don't advocate for that and cherry picking a select few BLM supporters as a gross generalization is the bad thing to do because they are not the majority in the group. Didn't you say cherry picking was a liberal thing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOjbn4GwobE
Here you go.
Don't worry,I won't cherry-pick. I am not a liberal.