Black Lives Matter brainwashes peoples' minds to make them hate whites.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
To achieve these goals they focus only on cases of black men killed by the police.
61% of them are white men. 32% are black males.
Black men are not killed out of proportion when you consider they’re much more likely to interact with police.
People are killed by police about as often as they’re struck by lightning but I don’t see many protests about storms.
- "Black on black crime and white on white crime." Irrelevant
- "Black men committing 52% of all the murders." - Irrelevant
- "Black children raised without fathers" - Irrelevant
Black Lives Matter tries to turn young men like Michael Brown and Jamar Clark into martyrs but these guys aren’t angels.
Incited riots, inspired shootings of police, and correlated with an astounding and deadly increase in violent crime in America’s major cities?
Does the BLM make the black people aware that 90% of black people killed are by the hands of other black people? No.
Does the BLM tell the black people that 74% of black children grow without fathers because they are born out of wedlock? Does it do anything to stop that?
Does the BLM tell the black people that black kids are not graduating out of high school and dropping out? Does the BLM do anything to change that?
Does the BLM tell the black people that blacks are 6.5% of the US population and yet commit 40% of the murders? No.
If the problem with blacks is because of their race and not their culture,then why did the single motherhood rate of the black community jump from 20% to 70%? Does the BLM do anything to stop that? No.
The BLM has a simple agenda: Ignoring the real problems of the black community and shifting the focus to hating white people. They blame all their problems on racism. The reason they can't get a job or education is not because they are a bunch of self-entitled babies who think everything should be handed to them on a silver platter,but because of racism. Everything wrong with them is racism. Nothing is their own fault.
If black people mattered to BLM, they would be trying to confront these issues, instead of making up a fantasy demon called "racism" and pitting the blacks against whites.
Does slavery exist anymore? No.
What are you trying to prove by posting definitions of BLM and "police brutality"? Just because you believe in something doesn't mean it exists. According to the FBI,there are less than 400 deaths a year through cop murder. 61% are whites,32% are blacks. I am failing to see the "brutality" here.
Loose characters and morals in the black community,more black children being born out of wedlock, 90% of blacks killed by blacks,blacks dropping out of high school,etc. These are issues that should be tackled and solved instead of focusing on a fantasy monster called "racism".
What's the brutality here? Where's the trigger happy people?
Loose morals and bad culture.
The BLM has brainwashed your mind by teaching you a word which doesn't mean anything: police brutality. The problem is not racism,but bad culture. 74% of black children are born out of wedlock and are raised without fathers. Don't you think that impacts their childhood at all? Don't you think that may be one of the reasons of their badupbringing? What does the BLM do to combat that? Nothing,because it's too busy to fight the imaginary monster called "police brutality".
Even black people themselves admit that black-on black crime is a bigger problem than racism. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
As the above link shows,white people are killed by police more or less the same as black people. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
The above link is the link which shows that 90% of blacks are killed by other blacks,not police. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
The BLM is brainwashing black people and teaching them not to focus on bettering their lives and improving their character,instead just blame it on the police and the white man.
Well....black people are being judged by the content of their character......
When they have children out of wedlock,drop out of schools,indulge in shootings and commit riots.
Well,if you dealt with black-on-black crime instead of being paranoid about what non-blacks would say,you would have dealt with that issue long ago. This actually has a lot to do with BLM because it claims to stand for black lives and yet never protects them from their biggest threats........black people themselves.
Also,of course,white on white crime exists. Nobody denies it,even though black-on-black crime is significantly higher than white-on-white crime. We don't ignore it and blame it on "racism". We find out ways to defend ourselves. We buy guns,train using them and then use them for our defense. The problem with BLM is that they don't do anything to combat black-on-black crime. They instead blame the white man for everything,which proves that Black Lives don't matter to Black Lives Matter.
2. "DADDY ISSUES"
So,as I expected,you spew out rhetoric without any facts. Almost every sentence in your 1st argument is a lie. Let's start:
Black kids growing up without fathers has not been happening for a very long time. You'll be shocked to know that under the Jim Crow laws and the 1960s,the number of black children growing up without fathers was 22%. Still high,but microscopic compared to the 59% in 1980 and the 57.6% now. Only a loss in character and morals can explain that. (Popenoe, David. Life Without Father (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996), 23.)
The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites. As of today,the rate of black fathers leaving their kids is 48.5%,those of Hispanics 26.3% and those of whites 18.3%. (US Census Bureau, “Living Arrangements of Children Under 18”: Tables –CH-2, CH-3, CH-4. 1960 – Present. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.)
"BLM has nothing to do with this." Oh,that's right,I forgot. Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
3. "SCHOOL IS FOR THE BIRDS"
Another lie. A noble lie,but a lie all the same.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-mar-24-me-graduate24-story.html
The above link show studies conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute which shows nearly half of the Latino and African American students who should have graduated from California high schools in 2002 failed to complete their education. Just 57% of African Americans and 60% of Latinos graduated in 2002, compared with 78% of whites and 84% of Asians. Now,this is just for only one state. One can only imagine about the rest of the country. People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.
"BLM has nothing to do with this." Oh,that's right,I forgot once again. Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
4. "MURDER? I'M BLACK,YOU RACIST!"
Again,as expected,you labeled proven facts of the FBI about blacks committing the most amount of murders as "racism agenda and stereotypes". The dropping out of high school and born out of wedlock are actually true,as I proved above with FACTS. It's very relevant as it shows how the BLM cares SO MUCH about the black lives lost in those cases,and how it is doing SO MUCH to help them. Also,according to the same WASHINGTON POST whose sources you posted,mass shootings account for a tiny amount of deaths in the USA.
How about riots? Be it Rodney King,Ferguson,Milwaukee,Chicago riots,every major riot in this country has been instigated by BLM,who believe violence is the answer when it should not even be a question.
5. "YOU'RE RACIST IF YOU CRITICIZE BLACKS,BUT YOU'RE EMPOWERING IF YOU CRITICIZE WHITES"
You just now admitted that there is hatred of white people among BLM. You literally wrote that in your 4th point. So,because some people used to keep slaves in the past,then that means that their sons and daughters should undergo the hate and revenge? Glad you cleared that up. Of course,it matters that America is not as racist as it was in the 1960s. It shows that the civil rights movement has reached so high to stop racism without the BLM's frantic efforts to revive it.
I already proved that blacks are dropping out of high school in higher rates than whites above with FACTS,which some BLM activists call "STEREOTYPE".
The idea that black people in the United States are disproportionately poor because America is racist; that’s just not true, at least not in terms of America’s racism today keeping black people down. It’s just not the case. If that were the case then you’d have to look at group income, and decide based on group income who’s been victimized the most, and who the country was built for. By that standard, the country was built by Asians, because the racial group with the highest median income in the United States is Asians. The Constitution was not written by a bunch of people who speak Korean. Because the Constitution is a document of freedom, not a document of ethnicity.
So here are the three rules. You want to be rich in America; you want to do well in America? Put aside the whining about the system.
According to the Brookings Institute, 2% of Americans who followed these rules are in poverty. 75% have joined the middle class. What about racism? 71% of poor families with children are unmarried. The poverty rate among non-married white families was 22% in 2008; that same year the poverty rate among black married couples was less than 7%.
But what happened to racism? Why weren’t those black married couples poorer than the single white moms? Because it doesn’t have to do with color; it has to do with life decisions.
Well,shouldn't the BLM be concerned about the single motherhood rate? Couldn't the BLM decide solutions about that? Couldn't BLM make black people aware of that?
Oh,that's right,I forgot once again. WHAT IN GOD'S NAME IS THE MATTER WITH ME? Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
6. "IT MUST BE THE WHITE SUPREMACY"
Nobody denies it,even though black-on-black crime is significantly higher than white-on-white crime. We don't ignore it and blame it on "racism"
The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites.
People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.
The dropping out of high school and born out of wedlock are actually true,as I proved above with FACTS.
It shows that the civil rights movement has reached so high to stop racism without the BLM's frantic efforts to revive it.
Well,shouldn't the BLM be concerned about the single motherhood rate? Couldn't the BLM decide solutions about that? Couldn't BLM make black people aware of that?
You automatically assume someone to be privileged because he has a particular skin color. THAT is racist.
Also,I would like to point out that this is the intellectual capacity of the Left. If you ask them for proof of institutionalized racism,their answer would be,"FUCK TRUMP,RACISM EXISTS. I DON'T HAVE TO POST EVIDENCE."
Blacks are not TARGETED as much as whites are TARGETED.
The BLM invents those words to corrupt your minds and make you hate whites.
The amount of whites born out of wedlock,or dropping out of high schools,or growing up without fathers is significantly lower than blacks.
The BLM doesn't care about black lives,only those BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION. They brainwash you and other blacks that the other problems are not problems,only BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION are problems,and for all of that,the white man is to blame. No facts. No evidence. Just the fault of the white man.
And since, Martin Luther King was the one who said that,he was a racist,was he?
Forty-three-year-old Willie Smith Ward was convicted and sentenced on robbery charges Wednesday, May 29. The Waco Tribune-Herald reports that Ward also threatened a grocery store employee who tried to stop him from stealing the rack of pork ribs in 2011.
The jury recommended Ward be sentenced as a habitual criminal. Ward has previous felony convictions for burglary, attempted robbery, aggravated assault, leaving the scene of an accident and possession of cocaine, and four misdemeanor convictions, including two thefts.
I have grouped Pros arguments
1.Black Lives Matter doesn’t address main black issues
I have grouped Cons arguments
1.BLM’s true purpose is as he explains:”it's a pro black movement. We aren't saying that black lives are more meaningful than everyone else's, we are saying black lives are just as meaningful as everyone else's. The BLM movement isn't about separation, segregation or disengagement. The BLM movement is about a positive resolution.”
Both sides made strong claims with facts and evidence. The deciding factor will be the rebuttals.
Case 1: Black issues in communities-King claims-”"dropping out of high school" and "growing up without a father" are stereotypes and simply irrelevant. Has nothing to do with BLM..”
Where Pro responds-”Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES.” Pro is able to back it up with facts and sources like-”The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites. As of today,the rate of black fathers leaving their kids is 48.5%,those of Hispanics 26.3% and those of whites 18.3%. (US Census Bureau, “Living Arrangements of Children Under 18”: Tables –CH-2, CH-3, CH-4. 1960 – Present. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.)”and “The above link show studies conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute which shows nearly half of the Latino and African American students who should have graduated from California high schools in 2002 failed to complete their education. Just 57% of African Americans and 60% of Latinos graduated in 2002, compared with 78% of whites and 84% of Asians. Now,this is just for only one state. One can only imagine about the rest of the country. People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.”
Next round rebuttals were the same shit.Con responds-”Can't be helped. Parental issues has nothing to do with BLM. I think your white privilege card declined.”
Doesn’t address the facts nor backs up claims of white privilege. Another problem with Con is that he tries to paint Pro as using his “white privilege” but only uses on incident to back up his claim.
Pro responds:”I posted a study conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute that showed nearly half of the black students drop out whereas only 7 to 8% of whites do so. Is that personal choice or white privilege? If it is white privilege,explain how. Oh,sorry,sorry,as you said in the comments,it's because the sky is blue. I get it. My bad.” Facts and Logic
Con also cherry-picked situations, such as the two cases and what-if situations.
Arguments-Pro
Sources-Tie
S&P-Tie
Conduct-Pro wins, Con used poor conduct
" Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
""you're a racist cunt"
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
"fuck you bitch"
Con said a number of things that had poor conduct. Arguments are tied because both sides made good points, I was leaning towards pro, but decided his points were not enough to give him the arugements, as both sides in this debate were sort of a mess.
"bitch"
"fuck you bitch"
"classic case of white supremacy"
"classic case of white privilege"----pro's not even white lmao
"The police are the trigger happy people"
"Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
"you're a racist cunt"---which doesn't even make sense since Pro is not even white lmao
"MLK is racist"
So, the resolution here seems pretty clear; pro needs to show that BLM is systemically dishonest, and promotes a narrative of white hating.
Pros ENTIRE case here, is to throw an unending list of statistics, then assert that as a result of these; that BLM is brainwashing people to hate whites.
Even if I buy every specific thing pro says, he presents no evidence BLM brainwashes people to hate whites. At the very best, pros case is that BLM protesting police brutality and systemic racism is misguided, which falls way short of the rhetorical bar he set for himself.
Con correctly points out that the majority of these statistics raised are irrelevant; I side with him, though I think he could have elaborated on why better than he did.
It seems illogical to object to the validity of BLM protesting one particular type of injustice simply because there are more substantial matters at stake - this is prima facia absurd: For example, if I was punched in the face, and lost my job: it would be valid for me to be angry about both: as just because I object in public about one doesn’t mean I am disinterested about the other. Without pro doing more here, I cannot accept these branches of arguments.
Even were I to lower the bar pro sets for himself, to be whether BLM is justified or not, in terms of whether the issues of police brutality exist or are justified.
Con throws out multiple examples of clearly outrageous police killings of unarmed black people. That there are multiple explained police murders; and pros stats also show black individuals are killed disproportionally to their population: this puts me firmly down on cons side on this one.
The remaining issue I have with pros case is touched upon by con.
Pros entire case is implying correlation is causation. He argues that there is a lack of male role models due to single parenthood, that blacks commit more murders.
Why?
I have two options.
First that there is some systemic racism that drove these trends which may or may not now be self fulfilling, which con hints at on a couple of occasions reviewing the historical trends after Jim Crow.
Second , that it’s all solely black peoples fault, that they’re more likely to be murders, criminals and delinquent fathers because they’re black. Pro doesn’t come right out and say this, he blames “black culture”. But the insinuation appears there throughout the whole debate. Not only is there a clear value judgement being made, but the implication being made appears to be as con states “villainizing black people.”
The default position here is CLEARLY not to pressupose that black people are now criminal solely down to themselves given some of the history and issues. On points out, so even in this case pro doesn’t meet his burden, and quite frankly, renders his entire case particularly odious.
In terms of cons case: the main aspect that won it was very much on his demonstration that unarmed blacks are killed frequently. For me, in combination with pros lack of overall warrant wins this. His points 7,8 and 9 were particularly well reasoned.
The remaining points surrounding issues that blacks have to deal with but whites are not are particularly reasonable, and lends themselves well to calls of systemic racism. Pro doesn’t appear to address any of them.
From this position, the debate rapidly degenerated, with tropes and insults from both sides.
In general, pro loses on overall resolution and warrant as covered above: there was much more focus on rhetoric and odious insinuation from statistics than there was a legitimate attempt to engage in the points. The information con added in relation to specific cases was enough to show the basic premises of BLM are valid, and the issues he raised does imply systemic Racism.
I feel con could very much have obliterated pros case from round 1, had taken a step back and dealt head on with the points raised: but given the above, he does enough to win the resolution.
Arguments to con.
Conduct: I’m tying this, as there was clearly instigation and insults being hurled from both sides.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate
POOR CONDUCT:
Con had the worst debate conduct I've ever seen on this website in a long time. Throughout the entire debate, Con insulted and had a condescending attitude with pro, CUE THE MONTAGE.
" You just want to pull out your white privilege card. "
" No, MLK was not a racist, but you are. "
" Again with the "what-if" scenarios. Nobody has time for that crap."
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
" Oh shut up you are the one with loose morals and loss of character "
And my personal FAVORITE!
" Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
This obnoxious behavior has cost Con their conduct point.
I ask for other voters to consider this as well when voting
Neither convinced me of their side as neither exactly had good sources nor analysis to back up their claims. And both had good spelling and grammar.
Yeah, it is really sad, what they have done.Cops are scared of doing their job now.
Also,he never talked about the Black Panthers when I mentioned them twice. Funny how the BLM brainwashes people.
Thats funny especially when he gets mad at you for "generalizing a race" but then turns around an says white people opress blacks. Even though it was white people who freed slaves
This guy I'm debating with tells me to "go and suck Trump's dick,you stupid bitch". And then he gets angry when I say that black people have lost their morals and destroying their character.
Those were the 4 major protests. You have to prove that a BLM protest was not violent. I have proved that the 4 major ones were.Your turn
>>You are white, so you are going to be bias for your race. I get it. You are gonna say there's NO racist white people. Ok I'm the liar!
I never said that. In fact, I did say there were some racist people, there are racist people of all races. However, it is a very small percentage and your claim of it being a majority without any evidence is absurd. You can't even back up your claim.
>>I have proved that Dallas, Ferguson, and Charlotte were violent.
There has only been 4 protests for the BLM? Is that your claim or do you actually realized you are painting an entire group based on 4 events?
>>So please try and name a major BLM protest where it wasn't violent
I am not playing along with shifting the burden of proof when I know the same courtesy is not shown to the person I am talking to. So are you actually going to prove me wrong and provide actual evidence for what you are claiming?
100th comment!, anyway Omar you are dumb. I have proved that Dallas, Ferguson, and Charlotte were violent. So please try and name a major BLM protest where it wasn't violent
You have provided anecdotes.
You have yet to provide how many BLM protests they were then said how many of them were violent then made an actual claim based on those findings. You have skipped the evidence and went straight to claiming things you have not provided evidence for.
One link about about one event and one state of emergency is not a representation of every BLM protest. Are you actually going to try to provide evidence?
I have presented evidence. All those events went violent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTmqbYNZ1t4
Still no evidence. You have made a claim and provided no evidence. Call upon your messenger or lord all you want. Doesn't change you haven't brought evidence. Do you actually have any or am I supposed to accept your second hand anecdotes?
Jesus Christ Omar, Dallas turned violent. Charlotte turned violentFerguson, Baltimore, Salt-Lake City, Dallas,Milwaukee,Detroit,etc,etc. It's not a coincidence. Whenever this stupid narrative is pushed by Obama and MSM, violence happens right after. BLM is a hateful movement at heart. We have never seen this out of the KKK or other groups that are claimed to be violent. Other groups do not see the level of riots seen at BLM protests. Feminists don't burn down cities. If there was violence at every tea Party event, then the MSM would be ALL OVER the Tea Party.
>>every single BLM protest somehow turns violent. I wonder why. Its also promotes violence
Evidence?
Meh, I like King. I think he wont listen to what you have to say because you come off as rude. Calling him a libtard Just take a step back and youc an come to good terms like me and King did
The only thing you destroyed is your dignity.
You are white, so you are going to be bias for your race. I get it. You are gonna say there's NO racist white people. Ok I'm the liar!
If you don't think racism exists then hey thats your opinion keep living in delusion
>>No Im not closed minded like you
You can't provide any evidence for your claims. Saying the grass is green won't change my mind about racism when you don't have evidence. The only one closed-minded is the one who obviously gets owned but refuses to change his mind because he has no facts or logic. Oh, like you.
About what? Me destroying you?
>>And you did not change my mind I dont listen to lies
What was a lie? The only one lying is you claiming most white people are racist without a smidgen of evidence.
No Im not closed minded like you
More like translation: I don't give a fuck
There's no point in talking to King. He literally just admitted he is closed-minded and even if you completely destroy him he will refuse to accept it.
lmaoooo what contradictory statements.
>>No I'm open minded I just refuse to respond to any of your dumb arguments because you just dont get it. Its like talking to a rock
Translation: I just got completely destroyed and have literally no evidence to back up my arguments so I will refuse to engage in any further discussion because this is what the left does when conservatives beat them.
I don't get it? So apparently if I dismantle your argument and ask for evidence "I don't get it"?
Police Officers can not do their job because BLM will hunt them down and doxx them, call for their head and their firing. What about the ferguson effect after the Protests In Ferguson caused by the shooting of Michael Brown that August, his officers had been hesitant to enforce the law due to fears of being charged, and that "the criminal element is feeling empowered" as a result.
No I'm open minded I just refuse to respond to any of your dumb arguments because you just dont get it. Its like talking to a rock. And you did not change my mind I dont listen to lies
So you are just closed-minded? I clearly changed your mind and you literally can't and won't respond to any of my arguments. Is this what the left has become? And people get triggered when we call them "libtards." We do it for good reason.
every single BLM protest somehow turns violent. I wonder why. Its also promotes violence
No
So do you concede your awful arguments?
if anyone should apologize it should be you for your demonic behavior
The definition of BLM already explains police brutality and lives being lost by cops.
White people commit crimes too, you stupid bitch
Exactly,that's why I said black lives matter should change their name to black lives matter when they are lost by cop action. Since you don't care about those blacks who are dropping out of schools and committing crimes,it's obvious that all black lives do not matter to you. So,change your name,please.
I never lowered my statistics and I resent the accusation. I dare you to prove any one or take back your words and apologize for lying.
None of your arguments breakdown the race of BLM supporters.
>>BLM doesn't do anything to help fatherless children or stop the single motherhood rate or help black people who drop out of schools. They only raise slogans against police officers like a bunch of hypocrites.
What is BLM to you?
@Boat
Lol ok
@Darth
Let's say the definition of BLM again and analyze: "Black Lives Matter is an international activist movement, originating in the African-American community, that campaigns against violence and systemic racism towards black people. "
Note: violence AND systematic racism.
This has nothing to do with dropping out of school, single mothers, or growing up with no fathers. For the people who never had both parents growing up or is going through some things like that in life, then the proper step would be to go to counseling. BLM (an activist movement) has no say in things like that because that is not the purpose of BLM. Like I said what you are doing is pushing stereotypes, making black people look bad unnecessarily while at the same time making white people like yourself look good by lowering your numbers and statistics, which is not right because this shows the type of person you are
Yeah,sure. Read my arguments. BLM doesn't do anything to help fatherless children or stop the single motherhood rate or help black people who drop out of schools. They only raise slogans against police officers like a bunch of hypocrites.
>>Black lives matter doesn't matter to black lives matter...only those lives lost by cop action.
Do you have evidence for this?
>>it does help my point that BLM sucks
Not an argument.
Do you have numbers of how many BLM protests have occured and have you found out how many are violent?
It is really boring listening to comments that don't really help your case.
Black lives matter doesn't matter to black lives matter...only those lives lost by cop action.
it does help my point that BLM sucks
>>Was a national emergency declared at any republican-based group riot?
Even if there was it still wouldn't help your point so basically a non-sequitur even if I answer it.
Darth said "Well....black people are being judged by the content of their character......"
To which King replied "And why do you think that? It's racism."
Those were his EXACT words. So yes, you are saying MLK is racist because he judged people on content of character and not color of skin.
Really? Well,you don't have any facts in the first place. The only fact you have is the sky is blue,so whites are racist.
Also,you said that judging people by the content of their character is racist in argument 13 of round 2. That was said by Martin Luther King. So,common sense dictates that you are calling MLK a racist.
>>I do have facts in my argument.
Yet you just choose not to say them? You haven't had a fact in any of your arguments and are not responding to my comment because you know I'm right. No shame in admitting it,.
@Boat
Stop spamming the same damn comment. Time for me to take your saying "Facts, don't care about your feelings"
I do have facts in my argument.
@DarthVader1
MLK is not racist do not twist my words
He actually said that judging people by the content of their character is racist......So,according to him,Martin Luther King was a racist.
ikr when u get to the core of these libtards they have no real argument and argue feelings over facts
BLM activist: White people are racist.
White man: How?
BLM activist: The sky is blue.
Is this the tolerant left? The "logical" ones? Ones without evidence and who resort to insults and giving up when their arguments lose grounds?
>>Shut the fuck up
Thanks for proving my point which will remain true until you contend it..."Yet you have no evidence to prove it...typical libtard cant back up anything with facts"
>>That is not what I am saying.
You literally said "Most white people are racist. That's like explaining why the sky is blue and why the grass is green."
I responded by saying the exact opposite..."Well according to you I can just say a group is racist w/out any evidence and its a universal fact like green grass."
I am white.
How is Trump racist? Why would he give a 1 million dollar prize to a black? Why would he appoint multiple blacks do his cabinet? Why are his policies continuing to make black unemployment go down to record lows? Why has he made so many blacks off food stamps? Why do so many blacks support him? Because they know he isn't racist and Trump is helping, not hurting them.
Your continued lack of any evidence and resorting to insults prove my profile picture about many liberals..."Facts don't care about your feelings."
Isn't it?
Interesting
Yeah,yeah,yeah.....everyone's a racist. Anyone who doesn't agree with BLM is a racist. Save your hypocritical speech for the next time the BLM starts a riot.
He supports the Democratic Party,which went to war in support of slavery and founded the KKK,and he says Trump is a racist,LOL.
Mhm you are white. I get it now. No wonder! And why would you said "You are actually being racist towards me by assuming I am privileged just by the melanin in my skin" if you are white?
Fuck Trump he's still racist.
Btw nice profile picture.