Black Lives Matter brainwashes peoples' minds to make them hate whites.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
To achieve these goals they focus only on cases of black men killed by the police.
61% of them are white men. 32% are black males.
Black men are not killed out of proportion when you consider they’re much more likely to interact with police.
People are killed by police about as often as they’re struck by lightning but I don’t see many protests about storms.
- "Black on black crime and white on white crime." Irrelevant
- "Black men committing 52% of all the murders." - Irrelevant
- "Black children raised without fathers" - Irrelevant
Black Lives Matter tries to turn young men like Michael Brown and Jamar Clark into martyrs but these guys aren’t angels.
Incited riots, inspired shootings of police, and correlated with an astounding and deadly increase in violent crime in America’s major cities?
Does the BLM make the black people aware that 90% of black people killed are by the hands of other black people? No.
Does the BLM tell the black people that 74% of black children grow without fathers because they are born out of wedlock? Does it do anything to stop that?
Does the BLM tell the black people that black kids are not graduating out of high school and dropping out? Does the BLM do anything to change that?
Does the BLM tell the black people that blacks are 6.5% of the US population and yet commit 40% of the murders? No.
If the problem with blacks is because of their race and not their culture,then why did the single motherhood rate of the black community jump from 20% to 70%? Does the BLM do anything to stop that? No.
The BLM has a simple agenda: Ignoring the real problems of the black community and shifting the focus to hating white people. They blame all their problems on racism. The reason they can't get a job or education is not because they are a bunch of self-entitled babies who think everything should be handed to them on a silver platter,but because of racism. Everything wrong with them is racism. Nothing is their own fault.
If black people mattered to BLM, they would be trying to confront these issues, instead of making up a fantasy demon called "racism" and pitting the blacks against whites.
Does slavery exist anymore? No.
What are you trying to prove by posting definitions of BLM and "police brutality"? Just because you believe in something doesn't mean it exists. According to the FBI,there are less than 400 deaths a year through cop murder. 61% are whites,32% are blacks. I am failing to see the "brutality" here.
Loose characters and morals in the black community,more black children being born out of wedlock, 90% of blacks killed by blacks,blacks dropping out of high school,etc. These are issues that should be tackled and solved instead of focusing on a fantasy monster called "racism".
What's the brutality here? Where's the trigger happy people?
Loose morals and bad culture.
The BLM has brainwashed your mind by teaching you a word which doesn't mean anything: police brutality. The problem is not racism,but bad culture. 74% of black children are born out of wedlock and are raised without fathers. Don't you think that impacts their childhood at all? Don't you think that may be one of the reasons of their badupbringing? What does the BLM do to combat that? Nothing,because it's too busy to fight the imaginary monster called "police brutality".
Even black people themselves admit that black-on black crime is a bigger problem than racism. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
As the above link shows,white people are killed by police more or less the same as black people. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
The above link is the link which shows that 90% of blacks are killed by other blacks,not police. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
The BLM is brainwashing black people and teaching them not to focus on bettering their lives and improving their character,instead just blame it on the police and the white man.
Well....black people are being judged by the content of their character......
When they have children out of wedlock,drop out of schools,indulge in shootings and commit riots.
Well,if you dealt with black-on-black crime instead of being paranoid about what non-blacks would say,you would have dealt with that issue long ago. This actually has a lot to do with BLM because it claims to stand for black lives and yet never protects them from their biggest threats........black people themselves.
Also,of course,white on white crime exists. Nobody denies it,even though black-on-black crime is significantly higher than white-on-white crime. We don't ignore it and blame it on "racism". We find out ways to defend ourselves. We buy guns,train using them and then use them for our defense. The problem with BLM is that they don't do anything to combat black-on-black crime. They instead blame the white man for everything,which proves that Black Lives don't matter to Black Lives Matter.
2. "DADDY ISSUES"
So,as I expected,you spew out rhetoric without any facts. Almost every sentence in your 1st argument is a lie. Let's start:
Black kids growing up without fathers has not been happening for a very long time. You'll be shocked to know that under the Jim Crow laws and the 1960s,the number of black children growing up without fathers was 22%. Still high,but microscopic compared to the 59% in 1980 and the 57.6% now. Only a loss in character and morals can explain that. (Popenoe, David. Life Without Father (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996), 23.)
The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites. As of today,the rate of black fathers leaving their kids is 48.5%,those of Hispanics 26.3% and those of whites 18.3%. (US Census Bureau, “Living Arrangements of Children Under 18”: Tables –CH-2, CH-3, CH-4. 1960 – Present. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.)
"BLM has nothing to do with this." Oh,that's right,I forgot. Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
3. "SCHOOL IS FOR THE BIRDS"
Another lie. A noble lie,but a lie all the same.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-mar-24-me-graduate24-story.html
The above link show studies conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute which shows nearly half of the Latino and African American students who should have graduated from California high schools in 2002 failed to complete their education. Just 57% of African Americans and 60% of Latinos graduated in 2002, compared with 78% of whites and 84% of Asians. Now,this is just for only one state. One can only imagine about the rest of the country. People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.
"BLM has nothing to do with this." Oh,that's right,I forgot once again. Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
4. "MURDER? I'M BLACK,YOU RACIST!"
Again,as expected,you labeled proven facts of the FBI about blacks committing the most amount of murders as "racism agenda and stereotypes". The dropping out of high school and born out of wedlock are actually true,as I proved above with FACTS. It's very relevant as it shows how the BLM cares SO MUCH about the black lives lost in those cases,and how it is doing SO MUCH to help them. Also,according to the same WASHINGTON POST whose sources you posted,mass shootings account for a tiny amount of deaths in the USA.
How about riots? Be it Rodney King,Ferguson,Milwaukee,Chicago riots,every major riot in this country has been instigated by BLM,who believe violence is the answer when it should not even be a question.
5. "YOU'RE RACIST IF YOU CRITICIZE BLACKS,BUT YOU'RE EMPOWERING IF YOU CRITICIZE WHITES"
You just now admitted that there is hatred of white people among BLM. You literally wrote that in your 4th point. So,because some people used to keep slaves in the past,then that means that their sons and daughters should undergo the hate and revenge? Glad you cleared that up. Of course,it matters that America is not as racist as it was in the 1960s. It shows that the civil rights movement has reached so high to stop racism without the BLM's frantic efforts to revive it.
I already proved that blacks are dropping out of high school in higher rates than whites above with FACTS,which some BLM activists call "STEREOTYPE".
The idea that black people in the United States are disproportionately poor because America is racist; that’s just not true, at least not in terms of America’s racism today keeping black people down. It’s just not the case. If that were the case then you’d have to look at group income, and decide based on group income who’s been victimized the most, and who the country was built for. By that standard, the country was built by Asians, because the racial group with the highest median income in the United States is Asians. The Constitution was not written by a bunch of people who speak Korean. Because the Constitution is a document of freedom, not a document of ethnicity.
So here are the three rules. You want to be rich in America; you want to do well in America? Put aside the whining about the system.
According to the Brookings Institute, 2% of Americans who followed these rules are in poverty. 75% have joined the middle class. What about racism? 71% of poor families with children are unmarried. The poverty rate among non-married white families was 22% in 2008; that same year the poverty rate among black married couples was less than 7%.
But what happened to racism? Why weren’t those black married couples poorer than the single white moms? Because it doesn’t have to do with color; it has to do with life decisions.
Well,shouldn't the BLM be concerned about the single motherhood rate? Couldn't the BLM decide solutions about that? Couldn't BLM make black people aware of that?
Oh,that's right,I forgot once again. WHAT IN GOD'S NAME IS THE MATTER WITH ME? Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
6. "IT MUST BE THE WHITE SUPREMACY"
Nobody denies it,even though black-on-black crime is significantly higher than white-on-white crime. We don't ignore it and blame it on "racism"
The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites.
People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.
The dropping out of high school and born out of wedlock are actually true,as I proved above with FACTS.
It shows that the civil rights movement has reached so high to stop racism without the BLM's frantic efforts to revive it.
Well,shouldn't the BLM be concerned about the single motherhood rate? Couldn't the BLM decide solutions about that? Couldn't BLM make black people aware of that?
You automatically assume someone to be privileged because he has a particular skin color. THAT is racist.
Also,I would like to point out that this is the intellectual capacity of the Left. If you ask them for proof of institutionalized racism,their answer would be,"FUCK TRUMP,RACISM EXISTS. I DON'T HAVE TO POST EVIDENCE."
Blacks are not TARGETED as much as whites are TARGETED.
The BLM invents those words to corrupt your minds and make you hate whites.
The amount of whites born out of wedlock,or dropping out of high schools,or growing up without fathers is significantly lower than blacks.
The BLM doesn't care about black lives,only those BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION. They brainwash you and other blacks that the other problems are not problems,only BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION are problems,and for all of that,the white man is to blame. No facts. No evidence. Just the fault of the white man.
And since, Martin Luther King was the one who said that,he was a racist,was he?
Forty-three-year-old Willie Smith Ward was convicted and sentenced on robbery charges Wednesday, May 29. The Waco Tribune-Herald reports that Ward also threatened a grocery store employee who tried to stop him from stealing the rack of pork ribs in 2011.
The jury recommended Ward be sentenced as a habitual criminal. Ward has previous felony convictions for burglary, attempted robbery, aggravated assault, leaving the scene of an accident and possession of cocaine, and four misdemeanor convictions, including two thefts.
I have grouped Pros arguments
1.Black Lives Matter doesn’t address main black issues
I have grouped Cons arguments
1.BLM’s true purpose is as he explains:”it's a pro black movement. We aren't saying that black lives are more meaningful than everyone else's, we are saying black lives are just as meaningful as everyone else's. The BLM movement isn't about separation, segregation or disengagement. The BLM movement is about a positive resolution.”
Both sides made strong claims with facts and evidence. The deciding factor will be the rebuttals.
Case 1: Black issues in communities-King claims-”"dropping out of high school" and "growing up without a father" are stereotypes and simply irrelevant. Has nothing to do with BLM..”
Where Pro responds-”Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES.” Pro is able to back it up with facts and sources like-”The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites. As of today,the rate of black fathers leaving their kids is 48.5%,those of Hispanics 26.3% and those of whites 18.3%. (US Census Bureau, “Living Arrangements of Children Under 18”: Tables –CH-2, CH-3, CH-4. 1960 – Present. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.)”and “The above link show studies conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute which shows nearly half of the Latino and African American students who should have graduated from California high schools in 2002 failed to complete their education. Just 57% of African Americans and 60% of Latinos graduated in 2002, compared with 78% of whites and 84% of Asians. Now,this is just for only one state. One can only imagine about the rest of the country. People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.”
Next round rebuttals were the same shit.Con responds-”Can't be helped. Parental issues has nothing to do with BLM. I think your white privilege card declined.”
Doesn’t address the facts nor backs up claims of white privilege. Another problem with Con is that he tries to paint Pro as using his “white privilege” but only uses on incident to back up his claim.
Pro responds:”I posted a study conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute that showed nearly half of the black students drop out whereas only 7 to 8% of whites do so. Is that personal choice or white privilege? If it is white privilege,explain how. Oh,sorry,sorry,as you said in the comments,it's because the sky is blue. I get it. My bad.” Facts and Logic
Con also cherry-picked situations, such as the two cases and what-if situations.
Arguments-Pro
Sources-Tie
S&P-Tie
Conduct-Pro wins, Con used poor conduct
" Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
""you're a racist cunt"
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
"fuck you bitch"
Con said a number of things that had poor conduct. Arguments are tied because both sides made good points, I was leaning towards pro, but decided his points were not enough to give him the arugements, as both sides in this debate were sort of a mess.
"bitch"
"fuck you bitch"
"classic case of white supremacy"
"classic case of white privilege"----pro's not even white lmao
"The police are the trigger happy people"
"Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
"you're a racist cunt"---which doesn't even make sense since Pro is not even white lmao
"MLK is racist"
So, the resolution here seems pretty clear; pro needs to show that BLM is systemically dishonest, and promotes a narrative of white hating.
Pros ENTIRE case here, is to throw an unending list of statistics, then assert that as a result of these; that BLM is brainwashing people to hate whites.
Even if I buy every specific thing pro says, he presents no evidence BLM brainwashes people to hate whites. At the very best, pros case is that BLM protesting police brutality and systemic racism is misguided, which falls way short of the rhetorical bar he set for himself.
Con correctly points out that the majority of these statistics raised are irrelevant; I side with him, though I think he could have elaborated on why better than he did.
It seems illogical to object to the validity of BLM protesting one particular type of injustice simply because there are more substantial matters at stake - this is prima facia absurd: For example, if I was punched in the face, and lost my job: it would be valid for me to be angry about both: as just because I object in public about one doesn’t mean I am disinterested about the other. Without pro doing more here, I cannot accept these branches of arguments.
Even were I to lower the bar pro sets for himself, to be whether BLM is justified or not, in terms of whether the issues of police brutality exist or are justified.
Con throws out multiple examples of clearly outrageous police killings of unarmed black people. That there are multiple explained police murders; and pros stats also show black individuals are killed disproportionally to their population: this puts me firmly down on cons side on this one.
The remaining issue I have with pros case is touched upon by con.
Pros entire case is implying correlation is causation. He argues that there is a lack of male role models due to single parenthood, that blacks commit more murders.
Why?
I have two options.
First that there is some systemic racism that drove these trends which may or may not now be self fulfilling, which con hints at on a couple of occasions reviewing the historical trends after Jim Crow.
Second , that it’s all solely black peoples fault, that they’re more likely to be murders, criminals and delinquent fathers because they’re black. Pro doesn’t come right out and say this, he blames “black culture”. But the insinuation appears there throughout the whole debate. Not only is there a clear value judgement being made, but the implication being made appears to be as con states “villainizing black people.”
The default position here is CLEARLY not to pressupose that black people are now criminal solely down to themselves given some of the history and issues. On points out, so even in this case pro doesn’t meet his burden, and quite frankly, renders his entire case particularly odious.
In terms of cons case: the main aspect that won it was very much on his demonstration that unarmed blacks are killed frequently. For me, in combination with pros lack of overall warrant wins this. His points 7,8 and 9 were particularly well reasoned.
The remaining points surrounding issues that blacks have to deal with but whites are not are particularly reasonable, and lends themselves well to calls of systemic racism. Pro doesn’t appear to address any of them.
From this position, the debate rapidly degenerated, with tropes and insults from both sides.
In general, pro loses on overall resolution and warrant as covered above: there was much more focus on rhetoric and odious insinuation from statistics than there was a legitimate attempt to engage in the points. The information con added in relation to specific cases was enough to show the basic premises of BLM are valid, and the issues he raised does imply systemic Racism.
I feel con could very much have obliterated pros case from round 1, had taken a step back and dealt head on with the points raised: but given the above, he does enough to win the resolution.
Arguments to con.
Conduct: I’m tying this, as there was clearly instigation and insults being hurled from both sides.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate
POOR CONDUCT:
Con had the worst debate conduct I've ever seen on this website in a long time. Throughout the entire debate, Con insulted and had a condescending attitude with pro, CUE THE MONTAGE.
" You just want to pull out your white privilege card. "
" No, MLK was not a racist, but you are. "
" Again with the "what-if" scenarios. Nobody has time for that crap."
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
" Oh shut up you are the one with loose morals and loss of character "
And my personal FAVORITE!
" Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
This obnoxious behavior has cost Con their conduct point.
I ask for other voters to consider this as well when voting
Neither convinced me of their side as neither exactly had good sources nor analysis to back up their claims. And both had good spelling and grammar.
Lol, sorry I'm new to this site. I didn't know that there were rules I had to read first and other stuff I had to do.
*******************************************************************
Vote Reported: Christen // Mod Action: Removed
Points awarded: 3 points to pro for arguments, 1 point to con for spelling and grammar.
RFD: I agree that Black Lives Matter is a black supremacist group that makes black people look bad.
Reason for mod action: First, this user is ineligible to vote. In order to be eligible to vote, accounts must have read the site's COC AND completed at least 2 non-troll debates without any forfeits OR posted 100 forum posts
To award argument points, the voter must (1) survey the main arguments and counterarguments in the debate, (2) weigh those arguments and counterarguments against each other, and (3) explain, based on the weighing process, how they reached their decision.
To award S/G points, the voter must (1) give specific examples of S/G errors, (2) explain how these errors were excessive, and (3) compare each debaters' S/G. S&G errors are considered excessive when they render arguments incoherent or incomprehensible.
The voter should review the COC here: https://www.debateart.com/rules
The voter should also review this: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/346?page=1&post_number=4
*******************************************************************
Most blacks are racist towards whites.
You are using an argument from power that is compltely irrevelant. You have no evidence to back up your rediculous claims, so stop touting them to be true.
Thx.. no whites I know are racist
Yep, ya got it right. Good job!
No, racist to blacks, AH DUH
Of course. That explains it all "In my experience not most white people has not been all racist" of course you're gonna say that since you're white. Highly doubt any white person would be racist to you, another white person.
200th comment. Yay...
Yes i'm white.
Yes I can
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDfsD6G8E_g
So you can't back up your claims. Great to know.
Boat - Nothing else to say
Darth - I suppose
The sky is blue,man. The biggest proof of racism.
You didn't respond to anything I said except civil rights. "From my experience, most white people are racist. "
Sure...what do you constitute as racist? Since you are liberal, you are way more likely to get offended and claim racism even if in reality it isn't racist. From my experience, no white people are racist. That's like 5,000 people. Of course there is not evidence for my side, because if there are no racist people that literally means I have no evidence because there just isn't. The BoP is on you to prove most people are racist. We are past the civil rights. Stop living in your delusion that most white people are racist.
What if I say most black people are racist? How can you discredit this? I have no evidence but according to you I don't need evidence to prove my claim. So most black people are racist, and if you don't think so then I will say lmfao
racist - prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
You keep mentioning civil rights. We are passed the civil rights but that doesnt mean shit
That's the one thing BLM can do successfully: play the victim card.
Thank you for proving my point for me. BLM doesn't care about black lives.
So you don't have evidence. Nice.
"From my experience, most white people are racist. "
Sure...what do you constitute as racist? Since you are liberal, you are way more likely to get offended and claim racism even if in reality it isn't racist. From my experience, no white people are racist. That's like 5,000 people. Of course there is not evidence for my side, because if there are no racist people that literally means I have no evidence because there just isn't. The BoP is on you to prove most people are racist. We are past the civil rights. Stop living in your delusion that most white people are racist.
What if I say most black people are racist? How can you discredit this? I have no evidence but according to you I don't need evidence to prove my claim. So most black people are racist, and if you don't think so then I will say lmfao
Are you white?
In my experience not most white people has not been all racist, but go ahead and tell me Im from a different planet
Again I bring up this point , if black lives matter care about Black lives they would address these issues
You failed to rebuttal these points.
Dr.Franklin - Haha funny. Nice vote. No where in the BLM definition does it involve dropping out of school/single mothers or fathers leaving. BLM is basically violence/police brutality. BLM has nothing to do with people not having fathers. There are other organizations and professionals who help others in those fields. Nice bias
Like I told Darth:
Let's say the definition of BLM again and analyze: "Black Lives Matter is an international activist movement, originating in the African-American community, that campaigns against violence and systemic racism towards black people. "
Note: violence AND systematic racism.
This has nothing to do with dropping out of school, single mothers, or growing up with no fathers. For the people who never had both parents growing up or is going through some things like that in life, then the proper step would be to go to counseling. BLM (an activist movement) has no say in things like that because that is not the purpose of BLM. Like I said what you are doing is pushing stereotypes, making black people look bad unnecessarily while at the same time making white people like yourself look good by lowering your numbers and statistics, which is not right because this shows the type of person you are
Our Boat - No thanks. Too lazy :) "most white people are not racist" lmfao we must completely be from different sides of the world from eachother. From my experience, most white people are racist. You cant just throw out that only a small percentage is racist. You arent even providing evidence for that, yet trying to milk evidence from me.
Give me the evidence then! Prove your claims instead of this empty jibber jabber. Of course some whites are racist. i never said they were not. I just said it was a very small percentage and most white people are not racist, and you have no evidence to back that up. I'm the one who debated speedrace lol, get evidence for yourself. I rebutted all his claims. Think for yourself. If you give me evidence that most whites are racist and trump is racist then I will change my mind. Just give the evidence and I will change my mind. Simple. I'm open-minded.
Awww, how cute looks like the liberal is gonna pussy out.
Even if I give you evidence, nothing will change. You are white so of course u will be bias towards your race as if they are never racist lol. Trump is obviously racist. Check speedrace debate. He gave proof and links
"Done commenting on here, you people love to gang up on others."
All we are doing is pressing for any evidence because you have none. You have shown no evidence of Trump being racist, most white people being racist, or white privilege existing. If you provided evidence we could at least have an intellectual discussion and not roast you for your points being completely invalid and acting like a typical leftist.
What do I see. NO EVIDENCE
Dr.Franklin - Lol no race privilege exists? White privilege definitely exists. Are you that delusional? White privilege - inherent advantages possessed by a white person on the basis of their race in a society characterized by racial inequality and injustice.
Pink - Save that for the birds. Blocked you because you put an invalid vote for me one time on this site. Nevertheless.
Done commenting on here, you people love to gang up on others. (Ganging up on me and omar) sad.
Both sides had pretty good arguments however Cons's rebuttals were not so sharp.
Case 1.Pro claims:The amount of whites born out of wedlock,or dropping out of high schools,or growing up without fathers is significantly lower than blacks.
Con response:And?,Your white privilege card swiped again.
This was not a rebuttal. He also did not prove Why it was white privilege.
Case 2:Pro claims that BLM loses good morals in the black community-"Loose morals and bad culture."
Con response-"Bad culture now? Wow, I wonder what's next. Keep the stereotypes coming."
Con did not rebuttal with good points or facts. Instead claimed it was a stereotype
Sources-tie
S&P-Tie
Conduct-Poor conduct by con. As Pinkfreud08 politely outlined in his vote Con said this:
" You just want to pull out your white privilege card. "
" No, MLK was not a racist, but you are. "
" Again with the "what-if" scenarios. Nobody has time for that crap."
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
" Oh shut up you are the one with loose morals and loss of character "
He was also very rude in the comments to commentators such as myself, Boat, and Pinkfreud08.
*******************************************************************
Vote Reported: Dr.Franklin // Mod Action: Removed
Points awarded: 4 points to pro for arguments and conduct
RFD: See above
Reason for mod action: To award argument points, the voter must (1) survey the main arguments and counterarguments in the debate, (2) weigh those arguments and counterarguments against each other, and (3) explain, based on the weighing process, how they reached their decision. There is not enough discussion on these points in this RFD. Finally, and most significantly, one is not allowed to rely on other votes in order to make a decision. The voter must assess the content of the debate and only the debate, any reasoning based on arguments made or information given outside of the debate rounds is unacceptable. This includes reasoning that stems from already-placed votes, comment sections, and separate forums. Votes that impermissibly factor in outside content and which are reported will be removed.
The voter should review the COC here: https://www.debateart.com/rules
The voter should also review this: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/346?page=1&post_number=4
*******************************************************************
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate
POOR CONDUCT:
Con had the worst debate conduct I've ever seen on this website in a long time. Throughout the entire debate, Con insulted and had a condescending attitude with pro, CUE THE MONTAGE.
" You just want to pull out your white privilege card. "
" No, MLK was not a racist, but you are. "
" Again with the "what-if" scenarios. Nobody has time for that crap."
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
" Oh shut up you are the one with loose morals and loss of character "
And my personal FAVORITE!
" Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
This obnoxious behavior has cost Con their conduct point.
I ask for other voters to consider this as well when voting
*******************************************************************
Vote Reported: Pinkfreud08 // Mod Action: Removed
Points awarded: 1 point to pro for conduct
RFD: See above
Reason for mod action: While the conduct point is sufficient, there still needs to be a RFD on why the argument point is left as a tie. Reminder: The only time when you can vote solely for conduct is when a debater forfeits more than 1/2 the rounds.
The voter should review the COC here: https://www.debateart.com/rules
The voter should also review this: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/346?page=1&post_number=4
*******************************************************************
ok omar, apparently 60 million americans need empathy. Thx your the decider
I feel sorry for you both of you.
1) Trump supports. That in itself pretty much need empathy.
2) Don't understand how to make a coherent point. Did both of you fail English or something?
3) On top of all that you name-call. Really does go to show who the intolerable ones are.
This will be the last comment here because you guys are actually boring. It would be entertaining if you can provide a substantial point but guess you can't even fathom that. I can't help the helpless. That is what both of you are.
He probably posted his last comment and then had to go do personal stuff or something.
I know,but he ran away at the exact moment I asked for proof....The timing is really suspicious.
Omar hasn't been online for hours he didn't " run away "
I know right, he is so stupid. He's lie oh give me evidence when I gave him so much evidence like how one of the founders is on a terrorist watchlist.
Lol...this Omar guy said to me give me proof that BLM doesn't protest black on black crime. I said I can't give that proof because it has never protested against it,how can I give proof? And when I asked him to give proof because he said BLM protests black on black crime,he ran away like a true liberal does.
What, did you not see the evidence in my comment. Are you blind?
"One of the founders is on a terrorist list."
Did you just skip through that.
I called you a typical liberal because from my experience liberals who are not well-informed on issues tend to act like that.
No race privilege exists
Wow this debate escalated
What's even funnier about this " bias " accusation is firstly I've voted for you in several debates and countered a vote bomb made against you.
Secondly, I actually AGREE with your position in the debate, the only problem I have is that you are being a coward by blocking me and were exhibiting very poor debate conduct.
Your petty attempts to " insult " me have only highlighted that you have no real argument against my vote aside from ONE taken out of context quote. THe rest of my vote still stands.
Maybe he didn't vote against you because of bias. If it was bias,he would not have given you a single point. Maybe he voted against you because he realized that you're talking nonsense.
Obviously not. I said those mean nothing in the way of conclusive proof that cops are racist and kill more blacks. They kill more whites,and 90% of blacks are killed by other blacks. But the BLM lies about that.
Pink - Of course. Bias.
Darth - No, your negativity will kill you. Of course all deaths mean something but you act as if black lives being taken away from the cops dont mean anything. You literally said "Those mean nothing." lol
Be careful,buddy. You are providing proper facts. You might be a Trump cocksucker like this guy I'm debating with says.
All this hate is gonna kill you,man. You could go sign up for the Black Panthers to vent out your anger,but I'm afraid they don't exist anymore. Deaths obviously mean something. All deaths. Not just deaths by cops as BLM says.
Typical BLM behavior again. When you can't debate properly because you're defending something that can't be defended,blame your opponent.