Black Lives Matter brainwashes peoples' minds to make them hate whites.
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 4 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
To achieve these goals they focus only on cases of black men killed by the police.
61% of them are white men. 32% are black males.
Black men are not killed out of proportion when you consider they’re much more likely to interact with police.
People are killed by police about as often as they’re struck by lightning but I don’t see many protests about storms.
- "Black on black crime and white on white crime." Irrelevant
- "Black men committing 52% of all the murders." - Irrelevant
- "Black children raised without fathers" - Irrelevant
Black Lives Matter tries to turn young men like Michael Brown and Jamar Clark into martyrs but these guys aren’t angels.
Incited riots, inspired shootings of police, and correlated with an astounding and deadly increase in violent crime in America’s major cities?
Does the BLM make the black people aware that 90% of black people killed are by the hands of other black people? No.
Does the BLM tell the black people that 74% of black children grow without fathers because they are born out of wedlock? Does it do anything to stop that?
Does the BLM tell the black people that black kids are not graduating out of high school and dropping out? Does the BLM do anything to change that?
Does the BLM tell the black people that blacks are 6.5% of the US population and yet commit 40% of the murders? No.
If the problem with blacks is because of their race and not their culture,then why did the single motherhood rate of the black community jump from 20% to 70%? Does the BLM do anything to stop that? No.
The BLM has a simple agenda: Ignoring the real problems of the black community and shifting the focus to hating white people. They blame all their problems on racism. The reason they can't get a job or education is not because they are a bunch of self-entitled babies who think everything should be handed to them on a silver platter,but because of racism. Everything wrong with them is racism. Nothing is their own fault.
If black people mattered to BLM, they would be trying to confront these issues, instead of making up a fantasy demon called "racism" and pitting the blacks against whites.
Does slavery exist anymore? No.
What are you trying to prove by posting definitions of BLM and "police brutality"? Just because you believe in something doesn't mean it exists. According to the FBI,there are less than 400 deaths a year through cop murder. 61% are whites,32% are blacks. I am failing to see the "brutality" here.
Loose characters and morals in the black community,more black children being born out of wedlock, 90% of blacks killed by blacks,blacks dropping out of high school,etc. These are issues that should be tackled and solved instead of focusing on a fantasy monster called "racism".
What's the brutality here? Where's the trigger happy people?
Loose morals and bad culture.
The BLM has brainwashed your mind by teaching you a word which doesn't mean anything: police brutality. The problem is not racism,but bad culture. 74% of black children are born out of wedlock and are raised without fathers. Don't you think that impacts their childhood at all? Don't you think that may be one of the reasons of their badupbringing? What does the BLM do to combat that? Nothing,because it's too busy to fight the imaginary monster called "police brutality".
Even black people themselves admit that black-on black crime is a bigger problem than racism. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
As the above link shows,white people are killed by police more or less the same as black people. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
The above link is the link which shows that 90% of blacks are killed by other blacks,not police. Does the BLM speak about this? No.
The BLM is brainwashing black people and teaching them not to focus on bettering their lives and improving their character,instead just blame it on the police and the white man.
Well....black people are being judged by the content of their character......
When they have children out of wedlock,drop out of schools,indulge in shootings and commit riots.
Well,if you dealt with black-on-black crime instead of being paranoid about what non-blacks would say,you would have dealt with that issue long ago. This actually has a lot to do with BLM because it claims to stand for black lives and yet never protects them from their biggest threats........black people themselves.
Also,of course,white on white crime exists. Nobody denies it,even though black-on-black crime is significantly higher than white-on-white crime. We don't ignore it and blame it on "racism". We find out ways to defend ourselves. We buy guns,train using them and then use them for our defense. The problem with BLM is that they don't do anything to combat black-on-black crime. They instead blame the white man for everything,which proves that Black Lives don't matter to Black Lives Matter.
2. "DADDY ISSUES"
So,as I expected,you spew out rhetoric without any facts. Almost every sentence in your 1st argument is a lie. Let's start:
Black kids growing up without fathers has not been happening for a very long time. You'll be shocked to know that under the Jim Crow laws and the 1960s,the number of black children growing up without fathers was 22%. Still high,but microscopic compared to the 59% in 1980 and the 57.6% now. Only a loss in character and morals can explain that. (Popenoe, David. Life Without Father (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996), 23.)
The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites. As of today,the rate of black fathers leaving their kids is 48.5%,those of Hispanics 26.3% and those of whites 18.3%. (US Census Bureau, “Living Arrangements of Children Under 18”: Tables –CH-2, CH-3, CH-4. 1960 – Present. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.)
"BLM has nothing to do with this." Oh,that's right,I forgot. Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
3. "SCHOOL IS FOR THE BIRDS"
Another lie. A noble lie,but a lie all the same.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-mar-24-me-graduate24-story.html
The above link show studies conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute which shows nearly half of the Latino and African American students who should have graduated from California high schools in 2002 failed to complete their education. Just 57% of African Americans and 60% of Latinos graduated in 2002, compared with 78% of whites and 84% of Asians. Now,this is just for only one state. One can only imagine about the rest of the country. People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.
"BLM has nothing to do with this." Oh,that's right,I forgot once again. Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
4. "MURDER? I'M BLACK,YOU RACIST!"
Again,as expected,you labeled proven facts of the FBI about blacks committing the most amount of murders as "racism agenda and stereotypes". The dropping out of high school and born out of wedlock are actually true,as I proved above with FACTS. It's very relevant as it shows how the BLM cares SO MUCH about the black lives lost in those cases,and how it is doing SO MUCH to help them. Also,according to the same WASHINGTON POST whose sources you posted,mass shootings account for a tiny amount of deaths in the USA.
How about riots? Be it Rodney King,Ferguson,Milwaukee,Chicago riots,every major riot in this country has been instigated by BLM,who believe violence is the answer when it should not even be a question.
5. "YOU'RE RACIST IF YOU CRITICIZE BLACKS,BUT YOU'RE EMPOWERING IF YOU CRITICIZE WHITES"
You just now admitted that there is hatred of white people among BLM. You literally wrote that in your 4th point. So,because some people used to keep slaves in the past,then that means that their sons and daughters should undergo the hate and revenge? Glad you cleared that up. Of course,it matters that America is not as racist as it was in the 1960s. It shows that the civil rights movement has reached so high to stop racism without the BLM's frantic efforts to revive it.
I already proved that blacks are dropping out of high school in higher rates than whites above with FACTS,which some BLM activists call "STEREOTYPE".
The idea that black people in the United States are disproportionately poor because America is racist; that’s just not true, at least not in terms of America’s racism today keeping black people down. It’s just not the case. If that were the case then you’d have to look at group income, and decide based on group income who’s been victimized the most, and who the country was built for. By that standard, the country was built by Asians, because the racial group with the highest median income in the United States is Asians. The Constitution was not written by a bunch of people who speak Korean. Because the Constitution is a document of freedom, not a document of ethnicity.
So here are the three rules. You want to be rich in America; you want to do well in America? Put aside the whining about the system.
According to the Brookings Institute, 2% of Americans who followed these rules are in poverty. 75% have joined the middle class. What about racism? 71% of poor families with children are unmarried. The poverty rate among non-married white families was 22% in 2008; that same year the poverty rate among black married couples was less than 7%.
But what happened to racism? Why weren’t those black married couples poorer than the single white moms? Because it doesn’t have to do with color; it has to do with life decisions.
Well,shouldn't the BLM be concerned about the single motherhood rate? Couldn't the BLM decide solutions about that? Couldn't BLM make black people aware of that?
Oh,that's right,I forgot once again. WHAT IN GOD'S NAME IS THE MATTER WITH ME? Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES. I'm sorry. My bad.My bad.
6. "IT MUST BE THE WHITE SUPREMACY"
Nobody denies it,even though black-on-black crime is significantly higher than white-on-white crime. We don't ignore it and blame it on "racism"
The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites.
People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.
The dropping out of high school and born out of wedlock are actually true,as I proved above with FACTS.
It shows that the civil rights movement has reached so high to stop racism without the BLM's frantic efforts to revive it.
Well,shouldn't the BLM be concerned about the single motherhood rate? Couldn't the BLM decide solutions about that? Couldn't BLM make black people aware of that?
You automatically assume someone to be privileged because he has a particular skin color. THAT is racist.
Also,I would like to point out that this is the intellectual capacity of the Left. If you ask them for proof of institutionalized racism,their answer would be,"FUCK TRUMP,RACISM EXISTS. I DON'T HAVE TO POST EVIDENCE."
Blacks are not TARGETED as much as whites are TARGETED.
The BLM invents those words to corrupt your minds and make you hate whites.
The amount of whites born out of wedlock,or dropping out of high schools,or growing up without fathers is significantly lower than blacks.
The BLM doesn't care about black lives,only those BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION. They brainwash you and other blacks that the other problems are not problems,only BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION are problems,and for all of that,the white man is to blame. No facts. No evidence. Just the fault of the white man.
And since, Martin Luther King was the one who said that,he was a racist,was he?
Forty-three-year-old Willie Smith Ward was convicted and sentenced on robbery charges Wednesday, May 29. The Waco Tribune-Herald reports that Ward also threatened a grocery store employee who tried to stop him from stealing the rack of pork ribs in 2011.
The jury recommended Ward be sentenced as a habitual criminal. Ward has previous felony convictions for burglary, attempted robbery, aggravated assault, leaving the scene of an accident and possession of cocaine, and four misdemeanor convictions, including two thefts.
I have grouped Pros arguments
1.Black Lives Matter doesn’t address main black issues
I have grouped Cons arguments
1.BLM’s true purpose is as he explains:”it's a pro black movement. We aren't saying that black lives are more meaningful than everyone else's, we are saying black lives are just as meaningful as everyone else's. The BLM movement isn't about separation, segregation or disengagement. The BLM movement is about a positive resolution.”
Both sides made strong claims with facts and evidence. The deciding factor will be the rebuttals.
Case 1: Black issues in communities-King claims-”"dropping out of high school" and "growing up without a father" are stereotypes and simply irrelevant. Has nothing to do with BLM..”
Where Pro responds-”Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES.” Pro is able to back it up with facts and sources like-”The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites. As of today,the rate of black fathers leaving their kids is 48.5%,those of Hispanics 26.3% and those of whites 18.3%. (US Census Bureau, “Living Arrangements of Children Under 18”: Tables –CH-2, CH-3, CH-4. 1960 – Present. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.)”and “The above link show studies conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute which shows nearly half of the Latino and African American students who should have graduated from California high schools in 2002 failed to complete their education. Just 57% of African Americans and 60% of Latinos graduated in 2002, compared with 78% of whites and 84% of Asians. Now,this is just for only one state. One can only imagine about the rest of the country. People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.”
Next round rebuttals were the same shit.Con responds-”Can't be helped. Parental issues has nothing to do with BLM. I think your white privilege card declined.”
Doesn’t address the facts nor backs up claims of white privilege. Another problem with Con is that he tries to paint Pro as using his “white privilege” but only uses on incident to back up his claim.
Pro responds:”I posted a study conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute that showed nearly half of the black students drop out whereas only 7 to 8% of whites do so. Is that personal choice or white privilege? If it is white privilege,explain how. Oh,sorry,sorry,as you said in the comments,it's because the sky is blue. I get it. My bad.” Facts and Logic
Con also cherry-picked situations, such as the two cases and what-if situations.
Arguments-Pro
Sources-Tie
S&P-Tie
Conduct-Pro wins, Con used poor conduct
" Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
""you're a racist cunt"
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
"fuck you bitch"
Con said a number of things that had poor conduct. Arguments are tied because both sides made good points, I was leaning towards pro, but decided his points were not enough to give him the arugements, as both sides in this debate were sort of a mess.
"bitch"
"fuck you bitch"
"classic case of white supremacy"
"classic case of white privilege"----pro's not even white lmao
"The police are the trigger happy people"
"Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
"you're a racist cunt"---which doesn't even make sense since Pro is not even white lmao
"MLK is racist"
So, the resolution here seems pretty clear; pro needs to show that BLM is systemically dishonest, and promotes a narrative of white hating.
Pros ENTIRE case here, is to throw an unending list of statistics, then assert that as a result of these; that BLM is brainwashing people to hate whites.
Even if I buy every specific thing pro says, he presents no evidence BLM brainwashes people to hate whites. At the very best, pros case is that BLM protesting police brutality and systemic racism is misguided, which falls way short of the rhetorical bar he set for himself.
Con correctly points out that the majority of these statistics raised are irrelevant; I side with him, though I think he could have elaborated on why better than he did.
It seems illogical to object to the validity of BLM protesting one particular type of injustice simply because there are more substantial matters at stake - this is prima facia absurd: For example, if I was punched in the face, and lost my job: it would be valid for me to be angry about both: as just because I object in public about one doesn’t mean I am disinterested about the other. Without pro doing more here, I cannot accept these branches of arguments.
Even were I to lower the bar pro sets for himself, to be whether BLM is justified or not, in terms of whether the issues of police brutality exist or are justified.
Con throws out multiple examples of clearly outrageous police killings of unarmed black people. That there are multiple explained police murders; and pros stats also show black individuals are killed disproportionally to their population: this puts me firmly down on cons side on this one.
The remaining issue I have with pros case is touched upon by con.
Pros entire case is implying correlation is causation. He argues that there is a lack of male role models due to single parenthood, that blacks commit more murders.
Why?
I have two options.
First that there is some systemic racism that drove these trends which may or may not now be self fulfilling, which con hints at on a couple of occasions reviewing the historical trends after Jim Crow.
Second , that it’s all solely black peoples fault, that they’re more likely to be murders, criminals and delinquent fathers because they’re black. Pro doesn’t come right out and say this, he blames “black culture”. But the insinuation appears there throughout the whole debate. Not only is there a clear value judgement being made, but the implication being made appears to be as con states “villainizing black people.”
The default position here is CLEARLY not to pressupose that black people are now criminal solely down to themselves given some of the history and issues. On points out, so even in this case pro doesn’t meet his burden, and quite frankly, renders his entire case particularly odious.
In terms of cons case: the main aspect that won it was very much on his demonstration that unarmed blacks are killed frequently. For me, in combination with pros lack of overall warrant wins this. His points 7,8 and 9 were particularly well reasoned.
The remaining points surrounding issues that blacks have to deal with but whites are not are particularly reasonable, and lends themselves well to calls of systemic racism. Pro doesn’t appear to address any of them.
From this position, the debate rapidly degenerated, with tropes and insults from both sides.
In general, pro loses on overall resolution and warrant as covered above: there was much more focus on rhetoric and odious insinuation from statistics than there was a legitimate attempt to engage in the points. The information con added in relation to specific cases was enough to show the basic premises of BLM are valid, and the issues he raised does imply systemic Racism.
I feel con could very much have obliterated pros case from round 1, had taken a step back and dealt head on with the points raised: but given the above, he does enough to win the resolution.
Arguments to con.
Conduct: I’m tying this, as there was clearly instigation and insults being hurled from both sides.
I would like to thank both opponents for this debate
POOR CONDUCT:
Con had the worst debate conduct I've ever seen on this website in a long time. Throughout the entire debate, Con insulted and had a condescending attitude with pro, CUE THE MONTAGE.
" You just want to pull out your white privilege card. "
" No, MLK was not a racist, but you are. "
" Again with the "what-if" scenarios. Nobody has time for that crap."
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
" Oh shut up you are the one with loose morals and loss of character "
And my personal FAVORITE!
" Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
This obnoxious behavior has cost Con their conduct point.
I ask for other voters to consider this as well when voting
Neither convinced me of their side as neither exactly had good sources nor analysis to back up their claims. And both had good spelling and grammar.
I apologize if it looks like I'm spamming or something, but I just had to break my response down into three parts, because it wouldn't let me fit it all into one comment.
You say that "It seems illogical to object to the validity of BLM protesting one particular type of injustice simply because there are more substantial matters at stake" and I agree with this. However, that is not what pro was doing. Pro was not objecting to the validity of Black Lives Matter protesting one particular type of injustice. Pro was mainly arguing that (1) In addition to Black Lives Matter protesting against police brutality, Black Lives Matter should also be protesting against others kinds of violence and poverty, like blacks killing other blacks, as well as black children growing up without a father that they can look up to, and (2) The fact that Black Lives Matter is only focusing on white police killing black people really does make them come across as just another black supremacist group that wants to make blacks dislike whites.
Pro was never arguing that Black Lives Matter should outright ignore police brutality in favor of other issues, nor was he trying to deny that police brutality exists. Pro was arguing only that Black Lives Matter should focus on all of those issues, not just a few, and concluded that they are doing far too little, and ignoring many other issues that blacks face, for a group that seems to care so much about black lives.
Fnally, you say that "the insinuation appears there throughout the whole debate." even though pro wasn't really saying that outright. I really think you should have just asked pro what he meant if you wanted more clarification instead of just assuming that this was "the implication being made". That is what the comment section is for.
Your entire RFD (Reason For Decision) incorrectly assumes that pro is (1) Trying to "villainize" blacks, which he isn't and instead just wants whites to stop being villainized, and (2) Claiming that it's all blacks fault. Pro isn't denying that racism exists, he just wants them to focus on all those black issues instead of just a small amount.
You say pro is just throwing "an unending list of statistics" but then say that "he presents no evidence BLM brainwashes people to hate whites." Whether or not this is true depends on exactly what kind of evidence you are looking for, and whether or not we can find that connection that pro makes between the statistics that he shows and the Black Lives Matter group brainwashing blacks into hating whites.
https://i-sight.com/resources/15-types-of-evidence-and-how-to-use-them-in-investigation/
This article shows that there are at least 15 difference types of evidence, but I want to focus on just 3 of them: Analogical, Direct, and Statistical Evidence.
"Analogical evidence uses a comparison of things that are similar to draw an analogy." "The most powerful type of evidence, direct evidence requires no inference." "Evidence that uses numbers (or statistics) to support a position is called statistical evidence."
I think pro did a great job at presenting both analogical and statistical evidence. He utilized analogical evidence to compare the issues with police brutality that Black Lives Matter seems to stand for with the issues of black killing other blacks, and then, using statistical evidence, showed how Black Lives Matter was focusing too much on only a small part of the problem, instead of the whole problem.
The kind of evidence you seem to be looking for is the direct one, which is going to be much harder, if not outright impossible, for pro to provide. Are you sure that that will be the only kind of evidence that can possibly convince you of Black Lives Matter's true intentions?
I disagree with your vote.
You claim that "pro needs to show that BLM is systemically dishonest, and promotes a narrative of white hating." Yeah, pro did do that. Pro specifically said that "90% of blacks that die of murder die at the hands of other black people, and that’s from the FBI homicide report." Pro also said that the Black Lives Matter group focuses "only on cases of black men killed by the police." So, mathematically, Black Lives Matter is only focusing on, at most, 10% of the problem, which is the police brutality towards black people, while ignoring the other 90% of that problem, which is blacks killing other blacks. Pro has, in fact, shown that Black Lives Matter is being dishonest to a certain degree because they should be focusing on 100% of the problem. Not 90%. Not 10%. Not any small percent, or half, or a quarter or whatever. They should focus on 100% of the problem, which is a combination of blacks killing other blacks, police brutality, and other issues like black children growing up without fathers. That was the point that pro was trying to make.
*******************************************************************
Vote Reported: Ramshutu // Mod Action: Not Removed
Reason: The vote was found to be sufficient per the site voting policy standards.
*******************************************************************
Also technically I'm actually not supposed to be asking that. Virtuoso messaged me and politely told me it's against the rules so from now on I won't be stating that.
I asked for you to CONSIDER the idea's illustrated in the vote. Perhaps you could use some of the quotes but provide more which I didn't reference. All you did was pretty much just copy and paste my quotes which is plagiarism.
I don't care if you credited me, plagiarism is still against the rules even if I was ok with it. ( and I'm not by the way )
UTTER BULLSHIT. Why did the vote say "I ask for other voters to consider this as well when voting" if I can't reference it. WTF
I didn't copy I said in in my vote, "as politely outlined". I CREDDITED you on my vote. Which is you want because you said "I ask for other voters to consider this as well when voting"
I was going to give arguments to darth, but I didn't. I'm helping king_8.
How can I justify a tie? They literally just tied. wdym
First Dr.Franklin,now your vote too? I don't know what's going on here.......or maybe I do.
*******************************************************************
Vote Reported: Our_Boat_is_Right // Mod Action: Removed
Points awarded: 1 point to pro for conduct
RFD: Con said a number of things that had poor conduct. I was going to give arguments to pro, but out of smypathy and not wanting to embarass con, I will not adress arguments.
"bitch"
"fuck you bitch"
"classic case of white supremacy"
"classic case of white privilege"----pro's not even white lmao
"The police are the trigger happy people"
"Have fun continuing to suck Trump's dick. "
"you're a racist cunt"---which doesn't even make sense since Pro is not even white lmao
"MLK is racist"
Reason for mod action: While the conduct vote is fine, the voter needs to justify the tied argument vote.
The voter should review the COC here: https://www.debateart.com/rules
The voter should also review this: https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/346?page=1&post_number=4
*******************************************************************
Stop copying my vote
It's so convenient how only your vote keeps getting removed,isn't it?
RFD PT2.
Next round rebuttals were the same shit.Con responds-”Can't be helped. Parental issues has nothing to do with BLM. I think your white privilege card declined.”
Doesn’t address the facts nor backs up claims of white privilege. Another problem with Con is that he tries to paint Pro as using his “white privilege” but only uses on incident to back up his claim.
Pro responds:”I posted a study conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute that showed nearly half of the black students drop out whereas only 7 to 8% of whites do so. Is that personal choice or white privilege? If it is white privilege,explain how. Oh,sorry,sorry,as you said in the comments,it's because the sky is blue. I get it. My bad.” Facts and Logic
Con also cherry-picked situations, such as the two cases and what-if situations.
Arguments-Pro
Sources-Tie
S&P-Tie
Conduct-Pro wins, Con used poor conduct as politely outlined by his vote,including
" You just want to pull out your white privilege card. "
" No, MLK was not a racist, but you are. "
" Again with the "what-if" scenarios. Nobody has time for that crap."
" Stop acting like you've never ever cussed in your life, bitch"
" Oh shut up you are the one with loose morals and loss of character "
RFD 1:
I have grouped Pros arguments
1.Black Lives Matter doesn’t address main black issues
I have grouped Cons arguments
1.BLM’s true purpose is as he explains:”it's a pro black movement. We aren't saying that black lives are more meaningful than everyone else's, we are saying black lives are just as meaningful as everyone else's. The BLM movement isn't about separation, segregation or disengagement. The BLM movement is about a positive resolution.”
Both sides made strong claims with facts and evidence. The deciding factor will be the rebuttals.
Case 1: Black issues in communities-King claims-”"dropping out of high school" and "growing up without a father" are stereotypes and simply irrelevant. Has nothing to do with BLM..”
Where Pro responds-”Black Lives Matter only cares BLACK LIVES LOST BY COP ACTION,NOT OTHER BLACK LIVES.” Pro is able to back it up with facts and sources like-”The issue of white fathers leaving their parents is unaddressed because it happens the least out of Blacks,Hispanics and whites. As of today,the rate of black fathers leaving their kids is 48.5%,those of Hispanics 26.3% and those of whites 18.3%. (US Census Bureau, “Living Arrangements of Children Under 18”: Tables –CH-2, CH-3, CH-4. 1960 – Present. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.)”and “The above link show studies conducted by Harvard University and Urban Institute which shows nearly half of the Latino and African American students who should have graduated from California high schools in 2002 failed to complete their education. Just 57% of African Americans and 60% of Latinos graduated in 2002, compared with 78% of whites and 84% of Asians. Now,this is just for only one state. One can only imagine about the rest of the country. People don't talk about whites on this issue,because of "white privilege". They don't because whites don't drop out of schools at the abysmal rate as blacks.”
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Dr.Franklin // Mod action: Removed
>Points Awarded: 4 points to pro for conduct and arguments
>Reason for Decision: See above
>Reason for Mod Action: Arguments are sufficient.
Voters may not reasoning based on arguments made or information given outside of the debate rounds. This includes reasoning that stems from already-placed votes. The voter appears to reference an existing vote for conduct points instead of placing an independent justification for conduct.
************************************************************************
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: PinkFreud08 // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 1 points to pro for conduct
>Reason for Decision: See vote
>Reason for Mod Action: The Conduct award is judged to be border line; borderline votes are considered sufficient.
************************************************************************
Most commented debate!
Your the one claiming this is nonsense? You are the one who literally can't prove any of your claims. If anything, I'm done rebutting your nonsense.
Mhm whatever, nice one. Done rebutting this nonsense. Goodnight. Way too many comments on this page now
I truly believe black privelege exists. You can't call me stupid because it is literally a fact even if I have no evidence to prove it. It's like saying the grass is green.
My bad, i will edit the comment! deuces.
Are you kidding me..I fucking HATE Omar.
Boat - Are you using that as a point just bc I said the sky is blue or do you seriously think Black privilege exists? I really hope you aren't that stupid.
Frank - Leborn James point was minute. :D
lol
How dare you contest there is no black privelege!! Ofc there is lmao...I dont need evidence lol the sky is blue
Omar, surprisingly had good points..-Isn't Lebron James one of the richest people alive? Yes so maybe it is not far fetched to say he is priveleged. Priveleged in being tall, Realising basketball can make him a lot of money and is really good at making money.
Now black privilege oh here we go lmfao you're starting to sound just like omar. Me and him actually had a black privilege debate on DDO. Check it out for info and your enlightenment. No longer entertaining your bullshit. Funniest shit I've ever read. Pretending white privilege doesn't exist and got the nerve to say black privilege does. You are very ignorant. You saying that made me lose all respect for you. Can't believe how delusional people are as if black people have it easy and that ALL white people are not racist and that racism doesn't exist. White privilege is very real. Black privilege is NOT real. Done with this conversation for real now. If you got something to say, message me and we can block eachother afterwards. Have the nerve to say Black privilege is a fact. That is all the way wrong. If black privilege is a fact then how the hell did slavery happen lol. Done.
https://www.debate.org/debates/Black-Privilege-Is-Real/1/
Lol, stupid liberals, SaY HapPy HoLliDayS!!
If divorce were restricted, then black fathers couldn't just leave. They would have to take care of the kids they made. In order for a family to legally divorce, there would have to be a new husband for the kids so they have a good male role model.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3P_uNXGPwk
"lol good one, seen that one coming. racism is a fact and white privilege is a fact. MLK is not racist bye. u mistook what i said."
It is not a fact if you have no evidence to prove it. Then what did you mean to say? That's literally your exact words.
Blacks being racist towards Asians is a fact and Black privlege is a fact.
No, do you brain? I said saying the n word creates more backlash then saying a white slur
Boat - "yeah...I can tell you use feelings over facts"
lol good one, seen that one coming. racism is a fact and white privilege is a fact. MLK is not racist bye. u mistook what i said.
Frank - "Today you can say redneck to anyone with no consequences. The N word is very frowned upon today,'
" - you proved my point lol n word is said more and is more serious bye
Its not about what slurs are more effective or not or whether one race has more slurs. Today you can say redneck to anyone with no consequences. The N word is very frowned upon today, also racist history was made by the Democrats.
yeah...I can tell you use feelings over facts
"you mistook what i said, you are the one who took it in wrong. I never said MLK is racist it never came out my mouth bye"
You literally said in response to Darth saying "you judge people by the content of their character"
Then you said "Why? Because racism"
Since MLK judged people on content of character, you are literally saying he is racist because he judged people by the content of their character.
Yes, of course they exist against white people. But the n word is much more serious. Each ethnic group carries its own list of racially appointed slurs, but black people have by far the longest, including Ape, Buck, Colored, Coon, Crow, Jigaboo, Mammy, (Porch) Monkey, Pickaninny, and Spook, to list a few. Each of these words denote what white people believed to be specific “characteristics” of black people. “Nigger,” however, was the holy mother of them all, because it expressed white people’s all-encompassing repugnance for black people. According to the African American Registry, the hateful slur implies laziness, ignorance, and inferiority, and was used frequently to modify nouns, verbs, and other adjectives.
Source: Aliah Luckman - "Who can use the N-word?"
smacking me in future debates yea sure. when it comes to racism i tend to let me emotions get in the way but other topics i am very good in hoe.
you mistook what i said, you are the one who took it in wrong. I never said MLK is racist it never came out my mouth bye
You know slurs against white people exist too,right?
Thanks for conceding you have no evidence. I look forward to smacking you in future debates.
You said it was racist to judge someone by the content of their character. So then you are saying MLK is racist.
term used more lightly than ever before lmfao..... im done here bye. nothing else to rebut and i never called MLK racist he was a noble man and he stood up for what be believed in
Who are you to say blacks are not racist towards Asians?
"I'm sure you haven't talked to every single white person on earth. That would be a looooot of people man. Yet you are preaching to me about big claims."
Yet you see 3 racists and say most whites are racist LOL
"Whites dont have to worry about being called niggers, a deragatory term towards black. Saying someone is racist is not deragatory."
You're claims of people being racist is not accurate because they are probably not racist. Saying the n-word doesn't automatically make you racist. It is a term used more lightly than ever before. Give me an example of what a White said or did to you that makes him racist.
"Laws dont mean shit because racism still exists."
No evidence. If most whites are racist, then why isn't there a huge uprising to make racist laws? Why aren't any racist laws being made? If they were racist, they would try to make racist laws.
I could be a kangaroo typing. I might not be a human though. By your logic you need proof of me being a human. I
" They are racist because the grass is green. Its just true."
LOL you're funny
"Not a single white I've talked to is racist."
I'm sure you haven't talked to every single white person on earth. That would be a looooot of people man. Yet you are preaching to me about big claims.
"Your claims that most whites are racist is quite frankly a deragotory comment towards whites"
Whites dont have to worry about being called niggers, a deragatory term towards black. Saying someone is racist is not deragatory.
Laws dont mean shit because racism still exists. "Because people are not racist" "Cuz they're not racist" lmfao you're very delusional acting as if racism doesnt exist
"How are blacks racist towards Asians if anything whites are racist towards Asians"
Well according to you, I can make up claims and tout them as true with no evidence. They are racist because the grass is green. Its just true.
"I am a human. I have no evidence to prove to you that I am a human. Am I not telling the truth?"
There actually is. Humans are scientifically defined. You have to have evidence that most whites are racist. Not a single white I've talked to is racist. Your claims that most whites are racist is quite frankly a deragotory comment towards whites. Racism is a big accusation. Why are there so many laws passed against racism after the civil rights? Because people are not racist duhhhh. Why aren't people trying to make racist laws? Cuz there not racist duhhhh
I am a human. I have no evidence to prove to you that I am a human. Am I not telling the truth?
Blacks were racist towards whites first? How? Look at slavery and white supremacy
How are blacks racist towards Asians if anything whites are racist towards Asians
Your claims are true...because you said so? Or because the sky is blue? You have no evidence therefore your claims can not be true.
Blacks were racist towards whites first.
Most Blacks are also racist towards Asians.
"Most blacks are racist towards whites."
Do you know why? Because most whites are racist towards blacks (first)
Done with this convo. My claims are true, bye.
It's not a problem. I'm going to PM you in a few minutes. Welcome to the site!