Rafael Nadal Is Better Than Roger Federer
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 6 votes and with 24 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- Two weeks
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
No information
Conduct for forfeiture
Full Forfeit
Pro offered 4 assertions without evidence, Con offered one decent reply but conceded all of Pro's points, followed by double forfeit.
Pro provided four reasons why Nadal is better (youth, superior serve, training & ball direction), Con conceded all of these points "Now, what you've said is quite true." but argued that because Federer gets injured less often, he is better. Pro rebutted this by pointing out that this debate is about who has superior skill and is therefore better, and not about who would win in a match. No further arguments followed so Pro's arguments stand unrefuted/conceded while Con's was rebutted. Arguments to Pro
Con ff'd 2/3 rounds, therefore conduct to Pro as well.
No S&G issues.
No relevant sources.
...................................................................
Full forfeit. Joshua didn’t do much better, but at least had one more round
Ooh. Nadal being better than Federer is a tough case to make. Props to pro for trying this. Sad to see the opponent forfeited.
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: RationalMadman // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 1 point to Pro for conduct
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit debate. Per the site's voting policy, full-forfeit debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the forfeiting side.
************************************************************************
*******************************************************************
>Reported Vote: Ramshutu // Mod action: Not Removed
>Points Awarded: 7 points to Pro
>Reason for Mod Action: This debate is a full forfeit debate. Per the site's voting policy, full-forfeit debates are not moderated unless the voter voted for the forfeiting side.
************************************************************************
I am not voting on this debate. This is a joke and the more I try to explain my vote on this the more I am confused about what the hell is going on in this debate.