The right wing is inherently more racist than the left.

"The terms right and left refer to political affiliations originating early in the French Revolutionary era of 1789–1799 and referred originally to the seating arrangements in the various legislative bodies of France.[1] As seen from the Speaker's seat at the front of the Assembly, the aristocracy sat on the right (traditionally the seat of honor) and the commoners sat on the left, hence the terms right-wing politics and left-wing politics.[1]

Originally, the defining point on the ideological spectrum was the Ancien Régime ("old order"). "The Right" thus implied support for aristocratic or royal interests and the church, while "The Left" implied support for republicanism, secularism and civil liberties.[1] Because the political franchise at the start of the revolution was relatively narrow, the original "Left" represented mainly the interests of the bourgeoisie, the rising capitalist class (with notable exceptions such as the proto-communist Gracchus Babeuf). Support for laissez-faire commerce and free markets were expressed by politicians sitting on the left because these represented policies favorable to capitalists rather than to the aristocracy, but outside parliamentary politics these views are often characterized as being on the Right.
The reason for this apparent contradiction lies in the fact that those "to the left" of the parliamentary left, outside official parliamentary structures (such as the sans-culottes of the French Revolution), typically represent much of the working class, poor peasantry and the unemployed. Their political interests in the French Revolution lay with opposition to the aristocracy and so they found themselves allied with the early capitalists. However, this did not mean that their economic interests lay with the laissez-faire policies of those representing them politically.
As capitalist economies developed, the aristocracy became less relevant and were mostly replaced by capitalist representatives. The size of the working class increased as capitalism expanded and began to find expression partly through trade unionist, socialist, anarchist and communist politics rather than being confined to the capitalist policies expressed by the original "left". This evolution has often pulled parliamentary politicians away from laissez-faire economic policies, although this has happened to different degrees in different countries, especially those with a history of issues with more authoritarian-left countries, such as the Soviet Unionor China under Mao Zedong.
Thus the word "Left" in American political parlance may refer to "liberalism" and be identified with the Democratic Party, whereas in a country such as France these positions would be regarded as relatively more right-wing, or centrist overall, and "left" is more likely to refer to "socialist" or "social-democratic" positions rather than "liberal" ones."

The BoP is either solely on you or is shared.  In case it is shared, I'm willing to provide my end of the BoP below.  You have yet to provide proof.

Here's a basic argument on how the Left are the undoubtedly the racist ones in terms of policy.

They allow for race based abortions to exist within the US. 

it is important to understand that the left supports equality by definition whereas the right is generally about preserving or enforcing social hierarchies and cultural values.

Being pro abortion is generally considered left wing but there is actually no basis for that. What about it makes it inherently left wing?

Racism is literally impossible for a far-leftist and literally mandatory for a far-rightist

Pro-life is considered right wing because of the Judeo-Christian values

Furthermore, Hitler, who was an extreme far right winger, was pro-abortion as long as the aborted fetus wasn't Aryan.

Abortion is an exception to this rule.  

Another exception is the one child policy, which is far left.  Communist China which was far left, embraced the one child policy with the exception for ethnic minorities.

 While you are right that the right generally wants to keep things the way they are, the key word is generally and such exceptions exist.  Abortion and Immigration are 2 examples.  Trump wanting the wall is not keeping things the way they are. 

You cited Wiki, which I don't think is the most reliable source for political content you can get.

Because abortions benefit women.

I would consider myself far right and most far righters like Ted Cruz (who is Hispanic) don't believe in treating whites superior on the basis of race.

The far left on the other hand, supports Affirmative Action, which despite the good sounding title, makes it harder for people to get into college if they are of European or Asian decent.

While some politicians like to point out the bible, many political commentators like Ben Shapiro have cited the science on the issue(1), ignoring all religious influence.  Hunter avellone, an atheist conservative has done the same thing(2).  Me as a non Christian conservative have done the same thing.

He had both right wing and left wing beliefs(3).  He was a nationalist, but he also was against citizens owning guns.

The left is more racist then the right because the left supports Affirmative Action whereas the right supports the MLK quote, "I have a dream that one day people will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character".

Super far-right Hitler not only supported racially selective abortion but he even aborted fully grown adults.

so how exactly is it far left?

Lol, thanks for admitting the right is inherently sexist too

Hunter Avellone is an atheist but also espouses a largely christianity based value structure and comes from a christian background.

a lot of soc-dems and liberals support affirmative action, that does not mean the whole left supports it.