The argument put forth by my opponent is that feminism is essential because women deserve to be represented and because they stand to defend preexisting rights. I inquire about Con's truthfulness, though. The liberty of speech is, after all, a well-known and cherished right. Still, feminists were very much in favor of the "Ban the word Bossy campaign." In 2014.
Ban Bossy - Wikipedia
I fail to see how Iranian women’s rights are relevant to whether American feminism is needed. Just because it could be worse, doesn't mean it cannot be better. Whether the movement should focus on other countries has little impact on it's existence in the United States.
Con doesn't seem to get what I'm saying. I used the Iran women's source to illustrate the argument that American women enjoy the same freedoms as any other citizen, unlike women in Iran, for whom feminism purports to advocate. If feminism is genuinely about supporting the preservation of gender rights, then it ought to exist wherever such initiatives are required, which is obviously not the case in America.
To address Con's abortion-related issue and pay grape. I think Con's argument is totally demolished by two excellent points. The first is that the Constitution does not grant women the right to an abortion. Although that would initially appear to be a concession made to my opponent, it isn't. Although abortion is not a right, states and municipal governments nonetheless have the authority to decide whether or not it is permitted. Therefore, even if it might not be a right, women are often not denied the ability to have an abortion. Women can actually determine whether or not abortion is morally acceptable for them by participating in local elections and voting. Feminism is, therefore, unnecessary. In actuality, feminism is detrimental to the right to an abortion since it would legalize it for all women while denying other women who disagree with it the ability to express their opposition as citizens of the United States.
The second fantastic refutation of Con's claim is that the compensation disparity he mentions is only based on statistics. Saying that women are paid less than males for the same work is not accurate nor compliant with the law. Since 1963, women have been entitled to get equal pay in the United States. While it is true that women make 30% less than males, this difference can be explained by age, education, employment history, industry, vocation, or work hours.
WB_Brief_Equal_Pay_Salary_History_Bans_03072023.pdf (dol.gov)
Now that it's been shown, feminism is useless and damaging in America. Con, please prove that feminism is necessary in America. because the arguments regarding salary disparities and abortion rights are insufficient.
Honestly, with abortion rights under siege, the rise of "influencers" like Andrew Tate, and the growing presence of Christian nationalism in our government, I feel like feminism is *more* necessary in the US now than it has been in quite some time.
feminism should always exist but in more friendly ways like women actually advocating and discussing instead of shouting at people and only for logical purposes