Instigator / Pro
28
1500
rating
3
debates
33.33%
won
Topic
#5434

Islam vs Christianity: Trinity is illogical (Untrue) vs Allah (one and only is real)

Status
Voting

The participant that receives the most points from the voters is declared a winner.

Voting will end in:

00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
10
1500
rating
0
debates
0.0%
won
Description

Embark on a compelling debate between Islam and Christianity as we scrutinize the theological concepts of the Trinity and the oneness of Allah. Representing the Islamic viewpoint, we contend that the doctrine of the Trinity is inherently illogical and untrue, contrasting it with the unequivocal monotheism upheld in Islam.

In this intellectually stimulating discourse, we will unpack the logical inconsistencies perceived within the Trinity, arguing that the notion of three distinct persons in one Godhead defies rational comprehension and violates the principle of divine unity. Drawing from Islamic theology and philosophical reasoning, we will present a robust case for the absolute oneness of Allah, emphasizing the transcendence and indivisibility of the divine.

Conversely, our Christian counterparts may defend the Triune Godhead, affirming the mystery and sacredness of the Trinity as central to their faith tradition. They may appeal to scripture, theological doctrines, and historical interpretations to elucidate the disconnectedness of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit within the divine essence.

Throughout this dialogue, participants will critically examine the implications of these theological positions on understanding the nature of God, salvation, and human existence. By fostering respectful discourse and thoughtful engagement, we aim to deepen our appreciation for the complexities of religious belief while affirming the core tenets of Islam in the face of theological divergence.
Debate Rules:

Burden of Proof Shared:
Both sides are responsible for presenting evidence and arguments to support their respective positions.
Use of Bible and Quran:
Both sides can reference the Bible and Quran to support their arguments.
No Heretical Beliefs:
Arguments must adhere to orthodox interpretations of Islam and Christianity.
Respect for Religion:
Debaters must refrain from disrespectful language or derogatory remarks towards religious beliefs.
No Vote Bombing:
Participants cannot engage in false or biased voting practices.
No Forfeiting:
Participants can only forfeit in unavoidable circumstances and if both parties agree.
Final Round for Conclusions:
The final round is reserved for concluding remarks rather than presenting new arguments.

These rules aim to ensure a fair and respectful exchange of ideas while maintaining the integrity of the debate.

Plz vote

Plz vote

Underdog
I can do debate with atheist. No problem at all.
Any one wants, come forward.

How would the government stealing everything help Christians to give everything to charity?

@wylted

The globalists try to get us to believe in God; and I (as a conspiracy theorist) think the concept of God is all an excuse to get the sheep (the peseants) to sell all they have and give to the poor to make the socialist dream of George Soros a reality.

I'm not a fan of the new world order; I stand for the flag; I don't kneel for the cross; that's part of the socialist world takeover!

It's all an excuse to try and get us to drink Judeo-Christian blood (by that; I mean the blood of christ; aka communion)!

-->
@TheUnderdog

I certainly am not Islamic but Muslims are not arguing the Quran itself is proof of God. God is quite obviously real, the rest is up for debate.

-->
@tigerlord

What is your response to Islam vs Atheism?

Saying Allah is real because the Quran says so is like saying Posiden and Hades are real because this book says so:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/176457190299?chn=ps&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-213727-13078-0&mkcid=2&itemid=176457190299&targetid=4580909053911840&device=c&mktype=&googleloc=&poi=&campaignid=603247654&mkgroupid=1236951625700523&rlsatarget=pla-4580909053911840&abcId=9316139&merchantid=51291&msclkid=201baeb050ae1f998fe9c81e9bf1770f.

-->
@MAV99

Now wana debate?

-->
@TheUnderdog

Its matter of fact people do not know about Islam much.
In my debate there are three elements.
1 debating
2 education
3 preaching
That is why I formulate arguments like that.
Thank you all

These doctrines are internally consistent, though they rely on elements of mystery and faith that transcend purely logical analysis, meaning that the trinity is rather more complex and it is established through faith. I assure you, Christ is the truth and the way.

-->
@FrancisWarren

Yeah, iirc a majority of accounts that are created on this site never complete a debate.

-->
@tigerlord

It's a shame that there was no real debate and TigerLord ended up debating himself. This seems to happen a lot. No one wants to commit.

It's a shame that there was no real debate and TigerLord ended up debating himself. This seems to happen a lot. No one wants to commit.

-->
@tigerlord

Tomorrow one of the 2 things will happen:

1. There will be hundreds of iterations of text in the sky saying, "Islam is real", "Christianity is real" or whichever religion happens to be correct.
2. No such iterations will happen in the sky (so either god is fake or god doesn't care if he is worshipped).

Whichever happens tomorrow is the religion I will subscribe to. All other forms of evidence can be argued to be mere coincidences. Like, "If the flying spaghetti monster wasn't real, then how come DNA is shaped like Pasta?"

There are 2 types of debators; the one who can make a really good argument with over 10 pages of text (you) and the one who can be much more to the point and condense their arguments. The 2nd will be more successful in changing other people's minds because normal people (even most DARTers) won't just read 10 pages of text for fun.

If you want to convert consenting individuals to Islam, then find out a way to condense all of your points into something simpler for people to understand, because very few people have a reading SAT score of 800 regardless of their religious beliefs.

-->
@MAV99

Ok on Saturday I will instigate it.

-->
@tigerlord

Sure. But make sure that is clear in the description.

-->
@MAV99

Debates are suppose to be difficult and my faith is important and necessary for me.
We can go like this I will pose the argument and do rebuttals for your arguments though I will compare both stances for people not for the sake of debate but for information while you can just talk and deal about trinity.
Ok? And voting would be based on trinity and arguments related to it.
What you say?

-->
@tigerlord

A comparitive debate of The Trinity versus Allah to see "which one makes more sense" is useless. That is not a debate. It is a comparitive study.
If you want to promote Islam, fine, use Muslim sources. But why does it have to be comparitive? That is adding way to much to a debate which really should be focused on the veracity of ONE proposition, and it is a totally unnecessary overload on voters and both opponents alike and definitely lends itself to irrelevent points being made throughout the debate making it unecessaryly difficult.

-->
@MAV99

For every debate I must put my stand point and i am here to promote islam not christianity so i will add comparison as well not only trinity 30000 words should be no problem for you to present your case and discuss another topic which is correlated. Also I want voting which of the theology make more sense and is true.
You cannot take this debate i guess. But we can have a new one.

-->
@tigerlord

But, You need to make it clear that we are debating the Trinity.

The oneness of Allah isa totally different topic.

-->
@tigerlord

If you want I will take this debate.

That guy ff the debate any Christian on site want to continue?

-->
@Casey_Risk

yup, that is true, but it is better to make things clear to those who may not have gone through those references, believe me in my first debate I did not do that, but most of the time people are lazy to go through the references and start blabbing nonsense.
I could make it short, but as I said before, it was a draft and I could not refine it because I was busy with stuff.

-->
@tigerlord

Just looking over your R1 arguments, you spend a lot of time on definitions, full explanations of basic doctrines of both Christianity and Islam, and whole quotes directly from the Bible (as opposed to just citing the relevant scripture). In my personal opinion, there is lot of wasted space here that could be better spent on actual logic and rhetoric.

-->
@Casey_Risk

it's not that, actually about this topic there is so much detail and arguments, no matter how concise I become still there is a lot to talk about. After all this debate about God and everything related to it.

-->
@tigerlord

Honestly, if even 30,000 characters isn't enough for you, you need to find a way to make your arguments more concise. There's no reason you should need that much space in your opening arguments.

-->
@tigerlord

"Last online 14 days ago."

I suggest you debate some debaters who are consistently on the site. Just get them to agree to 5 rounds and 30,000 characters. You need someone who wont forfeit, not someone who wont even show up to a debate.

-->
@Best.Korea

he is not answering on discord, seems he is going to forfeit.

-->
@Best.Korea

by the way i wanted to put more words but the limit expired. i think if they make it 50k it would be great. i do not leave things for 2nd time.

-->
@Best.Korea

you know its kind of draft, i could not organize and make better and fine it because i was occupied with stuff. in the last hour i just arranged little bit and posted. next round is going to be the real deal. you know starting a debate and making first case is most difficult task, when the discussion starts then its easy.
i will tell him come to post his argument.

-->
@tigerlord

I think people are afraid to debate you with 30,000 characters and 5 rounds.

I dont know anyone except you who can come up with 150,000 characters of arguments.

At best, I come up with like 80,000, and even that is when I put lots of effort.

-->
@tigerlord

Are you sure he will post? He wasnt online for the past 10 days. I think he will forfeit.

-->
@Best.Korea

He is consistent, can use different tools perfectly. And it look like the debate would be good lets see, i am going to try to never leave anything to counter in the first round, as 3k words are a lot though mostly not for me lol.

-->
@tigerlord

I hope he puts up a fight, as it will be boring if he just forfeits.

-->
@Best.Korea

see who want to debate with me.