Instigator / Con

Mall

1420

rating

398

debates

44.1%

won

Topic

#5040

There's justification for teaching homosexuality in academic schools.

Status

Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics

Better arguments

Better sources

Better legibility

Better conduct

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

Best.Korea

Tags

Homosexuals

Cancel Culture

gay pride

transgender

gay

Parameters

Publication date: 10.27.2023 09:24AM
Last updated date: 11.30.2023 01:11PM
Type: Rated
Number of rounds: 5
Time for argument: Two days
Max argument characters: 30,000
Voting period: One month
Point system: Multiple criterions
Voting system: Open
Minimal rating: None

Contender / Pro

Best.Korea

1264

rating

363

debates

39.81%

won

Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Questions on topic, drop a comment.

Round 1

Mall

10.28.2023 12:36PM

Con

Greetings.

I'm going to step aside be it that the opposing side is the affirmative and present their case for justification.

I will follow up with applicable questions of course.

Now as far as justification so we're on the same page, justification is what is necessary correction.

It is an answer to address an issue or problem. A correct answer of course.

For instance, killing someone in justification is not murder by law . Someone trying to murder someone is unjustified is a problem for that someone's life being tried to be taken away.

To solve the problem, the necessary answer or justification is to self defend one's life. No more, no less.

What is the problem? Identify it and solve it with the appropriate, necessary, correct application accordingly.

With this in mind, the opposing side may present their case of why academic schools of all places have a necessity to educate about homosexuality.

These are your middle schools, elementary schools in particular.

Alright, take it away .

Best.Korea

10.28.2023 12:46PM

Pro

Homosexuality is kind, so it should be taught. The more gays, the better. Its the straight who are the problem.

Round 2

Mall

10.29.2023 04:26PM

Con

Can you give us a justification for homosexuality to be taught in academic schools?

Best.Korea

10.29.2023 05:15PM

Pro

Justification: It will reduce violence towards homosexuals.

Round 3

Mall

10.30.2023 12:35PM

Con

It's like you're not catching on here.

Let me put the question this way.

Can homosexuality be taught aside from academic schools doing so ?

Best.Korea

10.30.2023 12:47PM

Pro

Can homosexuality be taught aside from academic schools doing so ?

Yes.

Round 4

Mall

10.30.2023 06:39PM

Con

Then there's no justification in schools as homosexuality can be taught outside of schools leaving teaching it in schools as unnecessary.

Do you follow all that?

Best.Korea

10.30.2023 07:03PM

Pro

A little more teaching = even better

So yeah, I am afraid that its still pretty much justified.

Round 5

Mall

10.31.2023 01:07PM

Con

"A little more teaching = even better

So yeah, I am afraid that its still pretty much justified."

A little more teaching outside of academic schools yes. There's is no necessity for academic schools on this. Absolutely none. You haven't built any argument that is exclusive or special to academic schools. You're definitely not even close to trying to argue in this topic.

Any point you've broached can just be applied outside or aside from academic schools.

I would like these debates to last longer comrade. Somethings are enjoyable long lasting.

Best.Korea

10.31.2023 01:11PM

Pro

#10

Well, I think gay should be everywhere, no?

Barney

10.29.2023 08:59PM

That R2 was brutal!

Barney

11.01.2023 01:09AM

Criterion

Con

Tie

Pro

Points

Better arguments

3 point(s)

Better sources

2 point(s)

Better legibility

1 point(s)

Better conduct

1 point(s)

Reason:

I expect con to win this, due to pros answers being so short as to fairly dismiss his case as a foregone conclusion.

…

Fob makes the case that an example of justification is to prevent greater violence (kill a murderer before they can kill you and/or others), but should there be another option than it is not justified.

Pro argues for decreased violence, which con counters that there are unnamed other places kids could be thought to get the same effect; pro is able to flip this with the logic that more decreased violence is better. Without anything to at least imply a better path, I have to give this to pro.

If debating this again I advise focusing a bit on the reliability of most the population being thought subjects at school. Some statistics on low rates of violence against gays in school would be a good counterpoint, and/or references to better uses of their time while at school.