Instigator / Pro
4
1500
rating
3
debates
33.33%
won
Topic
#4533

Islam Vs Anything2

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
4
4

After 6 votes and with the same amount of points on both sides...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
4
1587
rating
182
debates
55.77%
won
Description

Resolution: Marriage Between Prophet (SAW) and Aisha (RA) was normal.
My stance: Pro
Opponent's stance: Con
BOF: Shared.
Rule No 1: No insult to my religion which is Islam and no insult to any person discussed in Debate, especially Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and mother Aisha (RA).
Rule No 2: No trolling
Rule No 3: Anything in comment section is not part of debate unless something to be discussed and both parties accept, example., want to skip a round etc.
Rule No 4: No forfeit (if inevitable because of uncontrollable circumstances, then if both parties agree should not affect debate). Intentional forfeit will cause automatic loss.
Rule No 5: Evidence must be credible, broken links and resources which do not have citation must cause the loss of resources points. Wikipedia have citation in the bottom, so if a Wikipedia link is attached and there is citation within that page, then it should be as credible as any other external resource.
Rule No 6: Anyone can accept defeat in the middle of debate.
Rule No 7: No vote Bomb
Rule No 8: One shall read the full argument and must not ignore it. Both my contender and voters as well.
Rule No 9: No favoritism, Biased voting.
Rule No 10: We must assume Islamic historical references are correct, and can use any mean to prove our resolution, including scientific facts as well.
Rule No 11: No personal attacks, just keep everything related to topic.
Rule NO 12: Everything I am saying and doing, for the sake of debate, must not be called predator.
Rule No 13: Everything Being discuss, is for the sake of debate only, not imposing on any culture or society. Laws and regulation made for any country is for them and has nothing to do with the debate. And I am not opposing them.
Rule No 14: The whole debate is only about this specific debate, not for all and at large. I am not suggesting it for any place and person as well.
Rule No 15: Make the debate relevant to the topic and good and nice one.
Rule No 16: I ask my opponent to present his or her opening argument. I will keep the first round very simple with little information without arguments.
Thanks a lot
looking forward to a good debate in SHA Allah.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

.
Sir.Lancelot,

TIGERLORD, AKA, "PAPER TIGER’S" TOPIC: "Marriage Between Prophet (SAW) and Aisha (RA) was normal."

Narrated by Aisha: “that the Prophet married her when she was SIX YEARS OLD and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years. ( Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64)

Therefore, “Paper-Tiger” accepts that his stinking diaper-headed foul smelling and illiterate camel sweaty-assed Muhammad, that could not even write the language of Islam, and he lived in a cave outside of Medina, in marrying a SIX YEAR OLD INNOCENT CHILD was NORMAL and okay at this time period in history! WTF?!

Jesus and I can’t wait until this “Camel Jockey” pseudo-muslim “PAPER-TIGER" makes his second comment upon this topic, where the esteemed debater Sir.Lancelot in the debate, and myself in the “comment section” of said debate, are going to easily annihilate the pseudo-muslim “PAPER-TIGER" for taking this despicable view of Muhammad marrying a SIX YEAR OLD INNOCENT CHILD and the ramifications thereof in this dastardly act!!!

CHAIN UP "PAPER-TIGER!"

.

-->
@Barney

Again, this is not saying religions may not be insulted, it is however a reminder about the targeted harassment of singular site members and non-hypothetical family members.
This is what I am saying, there is a line for everything, even if the target is Muslim.

About argument, I put 2 weeks for a reason. I am a busy person I only have time on weekends, I tried to compile my argument last weekend, but my grandma died, so I could not.
I will do it this weekend.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

“ mentally and physically healthy.” is a great definition choice, as we can measure it without so much guesswork about society so very long ago.

-->
@BrotherD.Thomas

My apologies for misinterpreting your view on Muslims debating to be be favor of such, rather than a religious aversion to speaking up for their religion.

You’re welcome to start a debate on if mainstream Islam endorses those forms of child abuse, and use those historical pieces of evidence to support it. You can even argue something to the effect of any Muslim who does not support said abuses, is rejecting Muhammad and therefore not a true Muslim.

That said, an inferred accusation is still an accusation. If someone said “I hope I didn’t catch an STD while fucking so and sos mom last night” may argue they said they hoped they didn’t, but the context of implying they fucked said mother is still quite clear.

Again, this is not saying religions may not be insulted, it is however a reminder about the targeted harassment of singular site members and non-hypothetical family members.

Let’s hope he doesn’t forfeit on me and whine like a pathetic little bitch.

This fool really needs to hurry up and type his first argument already.

-->
@Barney

.
Barney,

YOUR QUOTE OF ME ALLEGEDLY CROSSING THE LINE RELATIVE TO THE GOAT-HERDER PAPER-TIGER AND HIS BABY: “ in future please do not accuse someone of being a danger to their children based solely upon membership in a large and varied organization.


MY SPECIFIC QUOTES RELATED TO “PAPER TIGER”:
“OMG!!! Tigerlord says he is holding his baby in his post #19, where in the ungodly Islamic world Muslim men can have SEX WITH BABIES as my following link reveals at their despicable expense: (https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/8016/posts/391549)………..I am praying to Jesus that tigerlord, aka, "Paper Tiger," will not degrade himself to the level of having sex with his own baby, for Christ's sake, (no pun intended).”

^ NO WHERE DID I SAY THAT “PAPER TIGER” WAS, OR SHOULD HAVE SEX WITH HIS BABY, but only hopefully THAT HE DOES NOT, even though Islam shows that Muslim men CAN HAVE SEX WITH BABIES in the true definition of the term.

Firstly, “Paper Tiger’s” membership, whether in a “varied organization” of the faith or not, is nonetheless IN THE NAME OF ISLAM at all times, and which “Paper Tiger” is a member at all costs as shown by him. Therefore, what else am I to think in being worried that “Paper Tiger” just might follow through with the ungodly acts shown below AND ACCEPTED by his stinking Islamic religion relative to having sex with babies!

.
IN THE NAME OF ISLAM,
Ayatollah Khomeini, IN THE NAME OF ISLAM, the founder of the Islamic republic of Iran, wrote of this practice regarding its practice with pre-pubescent children and babies:
ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ 12 : ﻻ ﻳﺠﻮﺯ ﻭﻁﺀ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺟﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺇﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺴﻊ ﺳﻨﻴﻦ ، ﺩﻭﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺎﺡ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻨﻘﻄﻌﺎ , ﻭ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺘﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻟﻠﻤﺲ ﺑﺸﻬﻮﺓ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻀﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺨﻴﺬ ﻓﻼ ﺑﺄﺱ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺿﻴﻌﺔ
Ruling # 12: It is not permission to have intercourse before (her) being 9 years old, be it in nikah (permanent marriage) or temporary marriage. And as for all other pleasures such as lustful touch, embracing, and thighing (ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺨﻴﺬ), there is no problem in it even with a suckling infant.
(Tahreer al-Waseelah, vol. 2, page 221-222)

Barney, did you read above that the hell bound Muslim man like “Paper Tiger” can “Lustful Touch,” aka, “FONDLING THE VAGINA, ANUS, ETC.,” embracing, and “THIGHING” a baby, aka, ejaculating between their legs upon their little vagina, EVEN WITH A SUCKLING INFANT which means a BABY?! Do you see where my specific syntactical sentence structuring was going in my post in question in being worried?!

Since the hell bound Ayatollah Khomeini is responsible for the above sex acts toward babies, I shudder in dismay in looking at this photograph of him herewith: https://www.imagebam.com/view/MELGHK7

.
In closing, why wouldn’t I expect to be worried in tigerlord “possibly” having sex with his baby AS DESCRIBED ABOVE, especially if he can accept that CHILD MARRIAGE OF 9 YEAR OLD GIRLS today in Islam IS ACCEPTED, and that wives of Muslim men can be BEATEN, and that a young girls CLITORIS is to be cut off so they cannot enjoy the sex act!

Therefore, when sex with babies is accepted by Islam, that is what I was worried about in my post #28 relating to Hell bound “Paper Tiger!”
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/53996

.

-->
@Barney

.
Barney, with all due respect to your position here on DEBATEART as a fair moderator, here is my followup to your post #62 relating to the goat-herder tigerlord.

YOUR QUOTE OF MISREPRESENTATION: “While you seem quite knowledgeable on Islam (particularly the apparent sacred need for them to argue),…”

First thing, the apparent need for the "carpet kisser" pseudo-muslim like tigerlord, aka, “Paper Tiger” is that HE IS NOT to argue or debate upon his sickening religion as the tigerlord ADMITTED TOO in the first place herewith: "Quran has forbid us to debate or argue .......” https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53713

When “Paper Tiger” ADMITS to not being able to debate or argue his despicable Muslim faith IN TOTALITY, then he is an outright HYPOCRITE when he does “try and debate his religion,” as seen in his last and current sorrowful and pitiful debates. Therefore, "Paper Tiger" should not even be upon this DEBATEART forum, period!

.
Furthermore, “Paper Tiger’s” heirarchy of his stinking Islamic faith say that he is NOT TO ARGUE OR DEBATE his camel humping religion as shown herewith:

1. أَنَا زَعِيمٌ بِبَيْتٍ فِي رَبَضِ الْجَنَّةِ لِمَنْ تَرَكَ الْمِرَاءَ وَإِنْ كَانَ مُحِقًّا
"I guarantee a house on the outskirts of Paradise for one who abandons arguments even if he is right."
Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4800, Grade: Sahih

2. الْمِرَاءُ فِي الْعِلْمِ يُقَسِّي الْقَلْبَ وَيُوَرِّثُ الضَّغائِنَ
"Arguing about sacred knowledge hardens the heart and produces resentment.”

Source: al-Madkhal ilá al-Sunan al-Kubrá 178
3. الْمِرَاءُ فِي الْعِلْمِ يُقَسِّي الْقَلْبَ وَيُؤَثِّرُ الضَّغْنَ
"Arguing about sacred knowledge causes the heart to harden and breeds hatred.”

4. Source: Jāmi’ al-‘Ulūm wal-Ḥikam 1/248
الْمِرَاءُ وَالْجِدَالُ فِي الْعِلْمِ يَذْهَبُ بِنُورِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ قَلْبِ الرَّجُلِ
Disputation and arguments about sacred knowledge cause the light of knowledge to extinguish in a man’s heart."
Malik ibn Anas, may Allah have mercy on him.

5. Haytam ibn Jamil reported: I said to Malik, “O servant of Allah, if a man has knowledge of the prophetic tradition (sunnah), should he argue to defend it?” Malik said: لَا وَلَكِنْ يُخْبِرُ بِالسُّنَّةِ فَإِنْ قُبِلَ مِنْهُ وَإِلَّا سَكَتَ
NO, rather he should convey the Sunnah if they might accept it from him, otherwise he should remain silent.
(Source: Jāmi’ al-‘Ulūm wal-Ḥikam 1/248)

.

-->
@Path2Paradise

“4:34 Husbands should take full care of their wives, with [the bounties] God has given to some more than others and with what they spend out of their own money. Righteous wives are devout and guard what God would have them guard in the husbands’ absence. If you fear high-handedness from your wives, remind them [of the teaching of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them. If they obey you, you have no right to act against them. God is most high and great.“

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

Continuing my previous comment,

Friends and allies of one other:
“The believing men and believing women are allies of one another. They enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong and establish prayer and give zakah and obey Allah and His Messenger. Those – Allah will have mercy upon them. Indeed, Allah is Exalted in Might and Wise.” – Quran 9:71 Sahih International)

The husband and wife are likened to clothing in the Quran (S. 2:187). They guard, respect and honour each other:
“They are clothing for you and you are clothing for them.” – Quran 2:187 (Sahih International)

In Quran 30:21 it says that God has placed “tranquality”, “affection” and “mercy”:,
“And of His signs is that He created for you from yourselves mates that you may find tranquillity in them; and He placed between you affection and mercy. Indeed in that are signs for a people who give thought.” – Quran 30:21 (Sahih International)

Ibn Kathir’s (1301 – 1373 AD) commentary on the above verse:
“Out of Allah’s perfect merscy He made their wives from their own kind, and CREATED LOVE AND KINDNESS BETWEEN THEM. For a MAN STAYS WITH A WOMAN BECAUSE HE LOVES HER, or because he feels compassion towards her if they have a child together, or because she needs him to take care of her, etc.” (Tafsir Ibn Kathir (Abridged) [Abridged by A Group of Scholars Under The Supervision Of Shaykh Safiur-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri. Maktaba Dar-us-Salam – Second Edition, 2003], volume 7, page 535)

Muhammad b. al-Sa’ib al-Kalbi (d. 763 AD) exegesis on S. 30:21,
“(And of His signs) of the signs of His divine Oneness and power (is this: He CREATED FOR YOU SPOUSES) human beings like yourselves (from yourselves that ye might find rest in them) so that the husband may find rest in his wife, (and He ordained between you) HUSBAND AND WIFE (LOVE) LOVE OF THE WIFE FOR HER HUSBAND (AND MERCY) of the husband towards his wife; it is also said that this means: love of the young ones of the old ones and mercy from the older ones towards the young ones. (Lo, herein) in that which I have mentioned (indeed are portents) signs and lessons (for folk who reflect) upon what Allah created.” – (Tanwir al-Miqbas min Tafsir Ibn Abbas on Surah 30:21 – online source http://altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=73&tSoraNo=30&tAyahNo=21&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2 )

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

"Islamic scripture encourages men to be misogynistic."
I would disagree

Heres what the Quran And Prophetic Statements say about wives:

Islamic scripture has strongly emphasized and taught to love your wife, to feed them, to treat them with kindness, as it is clearly shown in the following statements from Prophet Muhammad (p):
“I went to the Messenger of Allah and asked him: What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe yourself, and do not beat them, and do not revile them.” (Sunan Abi Dawud Book 11, Hadith 2139. Eng. Tran., Sahih Al-Albani, https://sunnah.com/abudawud/12/99 )
The above is a clear command from Prophet Muhammed (p) not to hit your wife.

The Prophet (p) used to treat women very tenderly. He said:
‘Whoever remains patient with regards to the misbehaviour of his wife, Allah will give him a reward as great as Ayub’s (Job) for his affliction. Likewise, if a woman keeps patient with regards to the misbehaviour of her husband, Allah will give her a reward as great as Aishah’s Bint Bint Muzahim, (the Pharaoh’s wife).’ (Al-Hakim in Al-Mustadrak – Transmitters of this Hadith are trustworthy) (Major Sins [translators: Abdul-Hamid A. Eliwa Ali M. As-Sawi, Wa’il A. Shehab, Mahmud AI-Qastawi] by Imam Shamsu ed-Deen Dhahabi, page 136, online source http://www.islamtomorrow.com/books/major_sins/majorSins.pdf )

The best husband is the one who is best to his wife :
“The Prophet said: ‘THE BEST OF YOU IS THE ONE WHO IS BEST TO HIS WIFE, and I am the best of you to my wives.’” (Sunan Ibn Majah volume 3, Book 9, Hadith 1977. Eng. Tran., Hasan, Darussalam https://sunnah.com/urn/1262960)

The most perfect faith are from the men who have the best bahviour towards their wives:
“Messenger of Allah said, ‘The believers who show the most perfect Faith are those who have the best behaviour, and the best of you are those who are the best to their wives.’” (Riyad as-Salihin Book 1, Hadith 278. Eng. Tran., https://sunnah.com/riyadussaliheen/1/278 )
A husband should not hate his wife because if he dislikes something in her, he will find something else he likes about her:
“Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger saying: A believing man should not hate a believing woman (wife); if he dislikes one of her characteristics, he will be pleased with another.” (Sahih Muslim Book 8, Hadith 3469. Eng. Tran., https://sunnah.com/muslim/17/81)

God loves kindness:
“’A’isha, the wife of Allah’s Apostle, reported that Allah’s Messenger said: ‘A’isha, verily Allah is kind and He loves kindness and confers upon kindness which he does not confer upon severity and does not confer upon anything else besides it (kindness).” (Sahih Muslim 2593 Book 32, Hadith 6273. Eng. Tran., https://sunnah.com/muslim/45/99 )

Abu Hamid al-Ghazali (1058 – 1111 AD) – Ihya Ulum-Id-Din:
“The Prophet of God said, “the most perfect of believers in faith are those who are the finest in manners and most gentle toward their wives.” He said, “The best among you are the most charitable toward their wives…” (Book On The Etiquette of Marriage – Being the Second Book of The Section on Customs In The Book: The Revival of the Religious Sciences (“Ihya Ulum al-Deen”) [Translated by Madelain Farah], by Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali, part 2 (II), page 96)

Buying gifts for your spouse, there will be love between one another:
“…that the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, “Give gifts and you will love one another.” (Al-Adab Al-Mufrad Book 30, Hadith 594. Eng. Tran., Hasan, Al-Albani https://sunnah.com/adab/30/57 )

Classical Scholar, Shaykh Abu Hamid al-Ghazali (1058 – 1111 AD) has put the above report in the section of “The Etiquette Of Marriage”:
“Exchanging gifts is desirable, and results in friendship.’ The Prophet said, “If you exchange gifts, you will love each other.” (Book On The Etiquette of Marriage – Being the Second Book of The Section on Customs In The Book: The Revival of the Religious Sciences (“Ihya Ulum al-Deen”) [Translated by Madelain Farah], by Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali, part 2 (II), page 89)

Sahih al-Bukhari:
“Whatever you spend (on your wife) will be considered a Sadaqa (charity) for you, even the mouthful of food you put in the mouth of your wife.” (Sahih al-Bukhari volume 7, Book 64, Hadith 266. Eng. Tran. https://sunnah.com/bukhari/69/4 )

Live with your wife in kindness (Quran 4:19):
“O you who have believed, it is not lawful for you to inherit women by compulsion. And do not make difficulties for them in order to take [back] part of what you gave them… And LIVE WITH THEM IN KINDNESS. For if you dislike them – perhaps you dislike a thing and Allah makes therein much good.” – Quran 4:19 (Sahih International)

I will continue with more in my next comment

-->
@tigerlord

Don’t apologize for being stupid. It’s not your fault you were born an inbred hick.

-->
@Barney
@Slainte

Barney Thanks a lot brother, and I apologize slainte as I did not know she is a girl.
Peace

-->
@BrotherD.Thomas

While you seem quite knowledgeable on Islam (particularly the apparent sacred need for them to argue), in future please do not accuse someone of being a danger to their children based solely upon membership in a large and varied organization. This crosses so damned far beyond the line, that it's unacceptable.

As an example, if someone says they believe in Odin I do not assume they're committed to animal sacrifice and committing murder/suicide or else going to Hel... I know at least one branch of that religion features such utter stupidity, but I should take it for granted that any one random person online is not in such an extra insane sub-sect.

-->
@tigerlord

Slainte IS a woman.
That’s why you insulted her.

Islamic scripture encourages men to be misogynistic.

-->
@Slainte

Who are you?
Man, I have done nothing wrong. You might be a celebrity among your friends. They all pampering you and exalting you. i do not know your history. You seem a normal person to me. My God, my Prophet, me being pious is nothing and targetable, but you are exalted?
I have never been bad with you un till you said bad about me, shall i post what you said?
If I am not wrong, you maybe a girl. If you are a girl. Then I apologize. Because I am never rude to women.
I wonder why you keep coming back? i have never said anything to you yesterday. And this message is a polite one.
if you think you are a good person, then keep away from this filth. I have shown I am no less in toxicity as well.
But onward, I will ignore garbage. Personally, I do not like toxicity. But if someone provokes me, then I am very impulsive.
if I keep ignoring you, then do not say I run away.
the thing is that, you do not deserve my attention.
And I really do not want you to change because of me. If you change because of me, then there is a chance you will change again. Your conversion shall be because of the truth. If Islam is good, then accept it. Do not look Muslim.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

I really hope you are wrong, yet I would not put a penny of a bet on you being wrong. It is very sad. My efforts are falling on the deaf and blind. That individual will not change me as a person. I hope they change.

-->
@Slainte

You’re too nice to this dumb fuck.

All you’ve done is show respect and this worthless prick decided to talk shit to you everytime. He’s not going to stop.

Give up on him. He’s hopeless.

-->
@tigerlord

2 things.

1. I do not know why you are hating on me, when I did nothing wrong. However it is what it is.

2. I agree with what you said in the comment. "Though, LGB campaign in your society will turn it into that, one day it will be compulsory for each of you to experience it to have knowledge of it or accept it."

I am not happy about how things are progressing, and the psychological implications to children. How can we have such perversion confuse the mind of a child? Why would we sexualize elements of life as normalizing behaviour, and corrupting children?

I told you I respected your views. I told you that I thought you were a better person than your comments. And you have shown it. I think a great debate topic for you is

"Islam does not endorse the victimization of children"

I wish you the best.

-->
@Best.Korea

Do not worry bro, they will see what they have not seen before, in sha Allah.
I have not said anything yet for my argument.
everything will be fine.

-->
@tigerlord

They are insulting you because you are basically making an argument for child marriages.

People from USA and Europe consider child marriage one of the worst crimes.

Of course, the education in USA and Europe is controlled to make them think that, but still you must consider that these people do get upset a lot when someone spreads such view.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

hahahahah, you think i want to go to US?
fcking bull shiii8t. My bro have nationality there. i can go anyway. But i do not want to go.
if even i married a girl from US, i will ask her to come live with me here. Who wants to leave heaven on earth.
man you need mental checkup, believe me. i am done with you. i am wasting my time with the looks of u. tard
tomarrow gonna post my argument for that bull shi8t argument you posted.
0.000000003-1 IQ

-->
@tigerlord

Your westerner wife will leave you for a black guy with a durag once she discovers you’re just using her for a VISA.

-->
@Bella3sp

I am upset from the saying of that bastard thomas, what she said about my little angel.
that thing i can aspect from the mannerless familyless dog licker pig eater western guy. Who can fck their own moms as they think they are descendant of monkeys. and everything is moral. And morality is subjective.
But they probably upset too. Because monkey facing a human, as most human do not give much intention toward monkeys, but i am kind man who think good of them.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

Keep pretending, I get at least 1 proposal every week. And most of them are filthy bitches who want to leave their husband from west. Right now I am considering one, but I have some standard. Would never lower it.
Delusion is a blessing in the face of ignorance.

-->
@tigerlord

I never said, I was talking about you. But, at least you guessed it yourself.

-->
@tigerlord

Don’t worry, I’d be angry too if my wife left me for a better man.

-->
@Bella3sp

well when they loose in argument, they become trash, because they are originally trash. When you are passing by trash can and filthy stinking trash, you become upset.

Well.. These comments sure are just wonderful. Seems like a little someone is upset.

this is what you got?
When you loose in arguments, you become like that, hahahhhaah
chicken shi8t

Imagine a western calling me cuck, hahahhahahahahahahahahah
this is the funniest joke I have ever seen.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

TBH, talking without is like throwing stones in poop, where the splashes will make me filthy.
You do not deserve my intentions. I am doing all that for thirsty souls who want salvation.
But garbage like you are a hurdle for reaching them.
but I will cross over from the garbage and focus on thirsty souls.
You are a copy and paste of thomas, so I am going to ignore you as well.
Gay and bastard, pedophile himself as well.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

your all brain cells are dead, that is why you can't read correct, otherwise you know whom i am talking with and about.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

i do not need permission from a person who do not know whom his father is, also who are well aware of what her mom's body count is.
about wife, she can't handle me, so I am looking forward to another.
a multi orgasmic guy, a MMA fighter and a body builder.
but you weakling who look like girls without beard and mustaches calling me cuck.
This thing is pretty common in your society.
Your mother and sisters go from one dick to another to measure them.
and they are wh0res and sluts.

-->
@tigerlord

I give you permission to call me and other atheists incestuous apes.

But only if I get to call you and all muslims kiddy diddlers, terrorists, wife-beaters, and camel-fuckers.

-->
@tigerlord

What’s pedophiliac about me saying you aren’t the father?

I’m calling you a cuck.

-->
@BrotherD.Thomas

bastard,
this is for among ourselves. not with others. and this is a general rule. But for people of knowledge, they are allowed to argue with someone in best manner. but if the person who is ignorant like you we must get away.
There are always exceptions.

TIGERLORD "IS NOT A MUSLIM" BECAUSE HE IS BLATANTLY GOING AGAINST HIS CAMEL HUMPING RELIGION OF ISLAM AND ALLAH GOD!!!!

Tigerlord, aka, "Paper Tiger" is pissing on his toilet paper Quran again because he specifically said that he is NOT, I repeat, is NOT to argue or debate his stinking Islam religion, as he specifically states herewith: "Quran has forbid us to debate or argue .......” https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394/comments/53713
.
The following Muslim "PRECEPTS" agree with tigerlord that the hell bound camel rider Muslim IS NOT TO BE UPON THIS RELIGION DEBATE FORUM in arguments and debates, period!

1. أَنَا زَعِيمٌ بِبَيْتٍ فِي رَبَضِ الْجَنَّةِ لِمَنْ تَرَكَ الْمِرَاءَ وَإِنْ كَانَ مُحِقًّا
"I guarantee a house on the outskirts of Paradise for one who abandons arguments even if he is right."
Source: Sunan Abī Dāwūd 4800, Grade: Sahih

2. الْمِرَاءُ فِي الْعِلْمِ يُقَسِّي الْقَلْبَ وَيُوَرِّثُ الضَّغائِنَ
"Arguing about sacred knowledge hardens the heart and produces resentment."
Source: al-Madkhal ilá al-Sunan al-Kubrá 178

3. الْمِرَاءُ فِي الْعِلْمِ يُقَسِّي الْقَلْبَ وَيُؤَثِّرُ الضَّغْنَ
"Arguing about sacred knowledge causes the heart to harden and breeds hatred."
Source: Jāmi’ al-‘Ulūm wal-Ḥikam 1/248

4. الْمِرَاءُ وَالْجِدَالُ فِي الْعِلْمِ يَذْهَبُ بِنُورِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ قَلْبِ الرَّجُلِ
Disputation and arguments about sacred knowledge cause the light of knowledge to extinguish in a man’s heart."
Malik ibn Anas, may Allah have mercy on him.

.
Furthermore, if tigerlord goes through with this debate that he is going to LOSE anyway, then he is a HYPOCRITE in not only his admittance is saying the Quran does does not want him or Muslims to debate Islam, but also the "PRECEPTS" shown above also say this fact, therefore the "Carpet Kisser" tigerlord doesn't really care about going to the Muslim Hell upon his earthly demise, because their camel humper god Allah says that HYPOCRITES to his word will be Hell bound!

1. A well-known Hadith says, “Among the signs of a HYPOCRITE are three, even if he fasts and prays and claims to be a Muslim: WHEN HE SPEAKS, HE LIES; when he gives a promise, he breaks it; and when he is trusted with an amana, he betrays” (Sahih al-Bukhari 33, Sahih Muslim 59)

2. “The HYPOCRITES, they are in the lowest pit of Hellfire”. The lower is the hell fire, the tougher is gets. Allah (swt) has reserved the lower pits of hell fire for hypocrites [In Surah Al-Munafiqoon, Allah (SWT)].

3. An-Nifaq Al-Akbar:
"It is when the external appearance of the person is having full belief on Allah, His book, His messengers and His angels as well as the day of judgement. But this person conceals within his real thoughts that negates all or some of these facts. Out Prophet (PBUH) was confronted with HYPOCRITES which are referred by Allah as the ones that are in the lowest depths of the hell-fire. “

4. حَسْبُهُمْ ۚ وَلَعَنَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ ۖ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌۭ مُّقِيمٌۭ ٦٨
"Allah has promised the HYPOCRITES, both men and women, and the disbelievers an everlasting stay in the Fire of Hell—it is sufficient for them. Allah has condemned them, and they will suffer a never-ending punishment." (Quran 9:68.)
Besides the above FACTS that explicitly show that “Paper Tiger” IS NOT TO DEBATE ANYMORE UPON THIS FORUM, because he turns into a HYPOCRITE if he does, then Jesus and I will have to correct him once again relating to the ramifications of his sickening Islamic faith, praise Jesus!

.
CAN THE "AHAB THE ARAB TIGERLORD" GET ANY MORE EMBARRASSED IN TRYING TO DEBATE UPON THIS RELIGION FORUM AGAIN, NO HE CANNOT!!!

.

After this debate, you are in my block list. I am looking forward to intellectual people, honorable people. There must be a way on this website site to avoid these kinds of things. If there is no way, then I am going to leave it.

-->
@Barney

Do i need to have debate with those bastards? This shows their level. Indeed, they are worse than animals. I pray to Allah, let them have countable days of life. There is no hope left for them.
This is you call high intellect? Which intellectual person will speak like that?
I did not think that they will lower their level lower to that level?
Where they are talking about a child like that.
When you can not debate, you become worst the pigs.
You know that you can not beat me in debate and you are using the cheap tactics. I have not offended anyone. Yet you call it class and level?
People like you belong to sewers and garbage dump.
You have no value, there is no standard like yours. You are lowly life, whom have no status and moral. Furthermore, you are the worst of creatures.

-->
@Barney

I am praying to Jesus that tigerlord, aka, "Paper Tiger," will not degrade himself to the level of having sex with his own baby, for Christ's sake, (no pun intended).
Do you not think this bastard son of bit8ch has gone too far here?
I swear if you allow it then you are the worst of creature, and despicable on the face of earth.

-->
@BrotherD.Thomas
@Sir.Lancelot

What is your mama's body count? ;)

My daughter really looks like me, so I do not need to get her tested for me bing her father. If you say anything bad about a 1 and half year old baby, then you are a real pedophile.
Most of you are victim of child abuse. I can understand your frustrations.
The word bastard is not in your dictionary because there is no moral standard. Everything is legitimate you can produce with your mother even because it's an animal kingdom. You consider human to be animals as well.

Sir.Lancelot
tell me, do you love your mother? ;) be honest what Richard dunking and other atheist says?
They say being intimate with siblings and inces is no problem.
monkeys do that, and for you being gay is also normal. That everyone has tasted it once in a while.

This shows how bastards you are.
slainte these sluts breed is what with whom you want me to be respectful?
Do you know what is a bastard percentage in your society?
When two friends overlap with each other in piggish manner. 3 sum 4 sum and many things like that.
In his bed in that's bed in those bed then against in his bed. Then there comes live shows where they test women for finding the real father for a child and after 16 test still father is not found.
And then the debates come up abortion is not immoral.
Abortion is not bad.
You can do with siblings and ancestors and nobody thinks it's bad. You can do with animals. And this is not hidden. There are millions of video over internet with the tag of porn.
That could be your mother or sister or aunt, and she could be a porn star, and you could not do anything about it. Finding father is not necessary for you because, you already know you can not find him because you are raised by single mother, and your mother do not know who is father. Because her body count is over 100. hahhahahahhahahahahaha

-->
@tigerlord

Gonna cry?

hahahahaha, this is your argument?
I was expecting more, so immature.

-->
@BrotherD.Thomas

I hope he doesn’t beat his wife when he discovers he isn’t the father.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

.
Sir.Lancelot, ,

OMG!!! Tigerlord says he is holding his baby in his post #19, where in the ungodly Islamic world Muslim men can have SEX WITH BABIES as my following link reveals at their despicable expense!
https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/8016/posts/391549

I am praying to Jesus that tigerlord, aka, "Paper Tiger," will not degrade himself to the level of having sex with his own baby, for Christ's sake, (no pun intended).

Seriously, you just have to "shudder" all the time when speaking about the worlds most deplorable religion known to man, which is the camel humping faith of Islam!

.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

.
Sir.Lancelot,

YOUR QUOTE TO THE D-MAN: What’s your opinion on this subject, BrotherD.?

The subject has been done before, as embarrassingly shown by tigerlord in LOSING this topics debate already! Duh!
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4394-islam-vs-anything1

With your expertise in subject matter, and your superior ability in debating, therefore, to make it "somewhat fair" for the goat-herder pseudo-muslim tigerlord, aka, "Paper Tiger," then you should enter the debate with your hands tied behind you, blindfolded, and type with your feet! In this way, your "Ahab the Arab" opponent just may have at least a 2 to 4 percent chance in winning this debate.

.

Rule #6 says you can still concede the debate with your pride intact!