1479
rating
3
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#4010
There MUST be a minimum AND a maximum voting age
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 5 votes and with 5 points ahead, the winner is...
Intelligence_06
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Open
1737
rating
172
debates
73.26%
won
Description
No information
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Dang Nabbit, I'm not too old to vote!
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Without a doubt.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Forfeiture.
Con also had a run kritik that cryogenics could invalidate any set maximum.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
"by the choice of one side to miss at least 40% of the debate, the requirement [to consider arguments] ceases."
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
ff whatever
It's to give the other person an extended round to respond.
Yeah. Why not have conditions placed on rights. Sounds like a greeeeeeat plan...
I'm kind of new here.
Why were you saying "extend" in the arguments?
Now to reveal the answer: The "must" can mean that "There has to be a maximum and minimum in voting age". The existence of at least one voter guarantees that the voting age has a maximum value and a minimum value, which means the topic can be interpreted as true.
Sadly my opponent didn't see it.
I see a way Pro can absolute crush my argument by seeing something I have seen but have not used because it would kill my side absolutely. Try to find it.
No, it is not going to. The title, the entirety of it, will.
That all caps MUST is most likely going to decide this debate.