A Resource Based Economy is the system adopted by all civilisations
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 1 vote and with 2 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- One day
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Humans, as I see it, are not fully civilised. We are a type zero civilisation, this implies that we have not learned to use or manage the resources of our planet fully or even wisely and thus all of our currently active socioeconomic systems are primitive and inherently flawed.
The RBE is not 'resource' based, nor is it an 'economy'.
At the age of 5, he developed a fantasy and obsession with being God, believing he had the ability and authority to control people like puppets.
As a teenager, he began his long involvement with Satanic cults, who eventually kicked him out. As a young adult
he joined the military. But he was deemed a serious threat to everyone around him, banned from having a gun, and locked up in a room for many years where he did nothing but draw weapons of mass destruction and mass murder.
While in the military, he sold model kits with toxic glue that killed 3,000 children. He continued to sell models with toxic glue and knowingly kill children until he was kicked out of the military over it.
He copied his model designs from the movie 'Logan's Run'.
e joined the KKK, and got kicked out of there too after trying to take over.
He then joined the Technocracy cult where he copied the idea of building a giant super computer to rule over mankind, with a secret team of 'engineers' who program the computer and control it from behind the curtains.
He then sold his scam to many people, ripped them off, built nothing and had them build him a home in Venus, Florida, which he called 'The Venus Project'. As his ignorant followers began to ask questions, they revealed many holes in his RBE and a great hidden evil behind it. He lost all his followers and disappeared with all the money he stole.
He became popular again after Eric and Peter Merola's 'Zeitgeist' movement.
The merging of the Merola's and Fresco didn't last, as their greed consumed them. I was the one who took them down after infiltrating them from within. It's part of what I do to protect the world, as the founder of Anonymous.
Wait a minute, you're that crackpot from DI
I can tell you are a troll at this point
the founder of anonymous, seriously?
You have a troll youtube channel where you make fake anonymous videos
pretend to be a prophet as well
It is an economic system based on real resources rather than social constructs.
Citation needed.
But above all, I just gave you 4 Youtube channels in my previous message with hundreds of videos of hidden camera recordings of these confessions and more. You ask for citations after I already gave you hundreds.
Cut the ass hat shinanegans buddy. Jacque was designing wing frames for aircraft and the like, he was never a soldier in the military or banned from having a gun. He was never shut up in a room drawing weapons, you literally just made that up.
You are already contradicting yourself you piece of shit troll. Was he shut up in a room or was he a glue salesman? And who the fuck sells models to children in the military? I know Jacque very well and I've never heard any of this shit.
Jacque Fresco was locked up in a store room for years, where he drew weapons of mass destruction killing people. He later started a business from his store room selling aircraft model kits of his weapons of mass destruction. Those kits had toxic glue that killed thousands of children. He continued selling them knowing very well that it was toxic and killing his customers, until he was kicked out of the military over it.
You know Jacque Fresco very well do you? You know him so well that you didn't even realise he's already dead and his RBE scam died with him? According to the RBE, only Jacque Fresco has the capacity to rule over it. When he dies, the RBE dies. In his final years, he made one last effort, asking for billions of dollars to produce a final movie than never happened, a movie he promised would change the world and bring about his RBE. He ran off with the money yet again, and eventually died of Parkinson's disease. You haven't heard any of this because they won't tell you any of it and they have gone to extremes to cover it all up. Review the links provided, question the holes in the RBE and see what happens. There are so many holes in the RBE that I wouldn't be able to fit them in this debate, so I will only respond to specific points you bring up. Deal with the points I have already provided. Don't jump from point to point with silly name calling. Deal with it, and be open to the possibility that you are catastrophically wrong.
No he didn't you cantankerous wanker biscuit.
He infiltrated the KKK, pretending to sympathize with their views, and then proceeded to try to change their perspective.
Or does your RBE overrule my right to preserve my race and heritage, my right to freedom of association, my right to even exist? Will you even answer that question? Do I have these rights in your RBE? What rights do I actually have?
Your understanding of Technocracy is ignoramically minimalistic.
Shut up.
I went down a bit of a rabbit hole here but I can't find anything conclusive. Zeitgeist was made by Peter Joseph and I have never heard "Merola" until now but upon googling it I found out that there is a documentary film maker (Similar to PJ) named Eric Merola and on a different site I saw there is an Eric Merola who lives in California (same state as Peter) who has multiple criminal charges and a relative named Peter Joseph Merola who is the exact same age as Peter Joseph.If they are really related and worked on the films together can you prove it?
Do you honestly think I'm going to believe that?
After watching your "refutation" of the RBE I have lost the motivation to reply to the rest.
I would still like to hear about the whole Merola thing though if you have any proof or additional information.
The cake is a lie.
I am not the one advocating Communism here
The fact that I can back up my argument with a list of links with extensive hidden camera footage of the people involved in your RBE
Indeed I am the founder of Anonymous. Review the thread about it and the 11 hour story here:
There is nothing economic about the RBE, outside of 'give me all your stuff or I will take it by force'.
Have you heard of what entertainment consists of in the RBE? Tennis and pool, that's it.
At the heart of the RBE is the idea that YOU are the rightful ruler of the world
than you can and must completely destroy human nature and heritage, and override it with your own will. That mankind are just empty puppets, clay to mold for your own amusement.
All of his confessions have been removed from false DMCA complaints and death threats, to cover it up. But you can still see hits of what he really thought and what the RBE looks like under the surface.
Jacque Fresco saying there is no purpose in life
(did you know he doesn't believe in morality?)
Tabula Rasa has been completely debunked for a long time. It's popular only among psychopaths with a power fetish
Jacque Fresco and his ties to Satanic cults
You are the one promoting this Satanic RBE cult, the burden of evidence falls on you. You have not produced a single shred of evidence, nor even an argument to support your RBE.
You know Jacque Fresco very well do you? You know him so well that you didn't even realise he's already dead
Or does your RBE overrule my right to preserve my race and heritage, my right to freedom of association, my right to even exist? Will you even answer that question? Do I have these rights in your RBE? What rights do I actually have?
I just want to say that your biggest give away is the humanity party video. That video is ridiculous, it doesn't address a single thing about the RBE. It's a long rant about how a stateless and moneyless society has a totalitarian state and a fractional reserve system, how Jacque wants to brainwash people with "healthy food" and how mixed races are prone to "ideological viruses". The video is incoherent, sloppily put together, and indicates total ignorance and trolling propensities.
Ironically, your somewhat racist ideas are actually disproven by Jacque himself.
He spoke at length about how environment and culture shape behaviour rather than race.
It's hilarious that you call him a racist with no proof meanwhile a giant part of everything he talked about was how humans are heavily subject to conditioning and if you take a child of any race and put it with any other race or culture
it will adapt to that conditioning and pick up language, ideas, values and mannerisms etc.from their environment.
The evil "mongrel races" you speak of are just as subject to this conditioning and if there is any truth to what you say at all, it is not because of their genes but because of their sense of cultural identity being poorly defined.
You are an imbecile racist hippopotamus fucking troglodyte ass nugget.
Tell me, in your own words what do you think "Communism" means?
I didn't see any hidden camera footage, just poorly edited audioclips and accusations.
You provide a single link that refutes you and proves what I say. You then provide a second link to the Venus Project website, proving what I said about Fresco's plan to harvest billions of dollars for a movie, where he ran off with the money as i said. As for phase 3, the experimental city, there is no such city in the RBE. According to the RBE, no such city is possible. According to the RBE, it can only work once the RBE has 100% control of all the world's resources. There has never been a single shred of effort to build an experimental city, nor was there any real plan to do so. The RBE is stuck on phase 2, harvesting money to make a movie. There never was a phase 3. It's all made up. It's a false promise to encourage people to give them money. They don't realise that the experimental city can only happen once the RBE has 100% control of the world first. But they intentionally omit that important fact.
As you provide only 2 links that only refute you and prove what I say, I provide about 30 links that refute you and prove what I say.
You lost me when you mentioned prophesy and started quoting the bible.
That's literally the fucking opposite of what it is. https://www.thevenusproject.com/the-venus-project/aims-and-proposals/
LOL. Fucking idiot.
Once again, that is the precise opposite of the truth. Jacque Fresco said that the earth's resources should be the common heritage of all people and that the concept of government and authority is primitive in the grand scheme of things.
This is how simpletons who are afraid of reality interpret what Jacque says. They assume he must be evil because he says that human nature and free will are bullshit and that humans are subject to the same cause and effect mechanics as everything else.
I don't see any proof, what the fuck am I even looking at right now?
There is no purpose in life. "Purpose" implies intention, intention is personal and subjective. There is no fucking objective purpose.
I don't believe in morality either, you know why?
Because it's a social fucking construct and it's completely fucking subjective.
You are a superstitious retard who believes in shit that other people made up to control you.
You know who the most "evil" people are 99% of the time? The fucking people who are the supposed arbiters of morality, law and order and the people who are considered "good" and "great".
Why are the nobility always insane psychopaths?
Why are the successful people in capitalism always fucking people over?
Why is government responsible for more unnecessary violence than any other type of institution?
Why does the catholic church protect pedophilia?
the institutions that give you your morality don't give a fuck and know that they are making it up as they go along, and they have enough money and power to get away with anything.
Tabula Rasa is not exactly accurate but it's close.
No proof, just "duuuuuuh Jacque is a commie cause' he don't like capitalism and he's a devil worshiper cause' he don't praise da lurd"
Why should I bother, you have already misunderstood enough on your own to make reasoning with you futile.
I know that he's dead.
If you need an institution to give you "rights" then you only have privileges.
Conduct to Con because Pro calls him a superstitious retard, a crackpot, a troll and says the following too:
"Cut the ass hat shinanegans buddy."
"No he didn't you cantankerous wanker biscuit."
"LOL. Fucking idiot."
Spelling and grammar is tied.
While Con used a lot more sources, neither side used a remotely reliable one. You cannot ask people to watch videos that are over an hour long at times and not even that, you can't use a video or even entire google search result page as your source. You need to quote, from the source, the part relevant to the debate and the source is how you avoid plagiarism concerns and how you increase reliability to what you are claiming... Nothing more, nothing less. Also the Venus Project is extremely biased in favour of Pro so I don't consider that a reliable source for this debate.
Both sides went into the arguments totally wrong. Pro wins because what Con did was try to prove that RBE is corrupt since it's founder is corrupt but the issue is that even if the founder is a racist shill, it doesn't mean that RBE isn't the system that all alien civilisations in the theory of 'type 1-4 civilisations' use. Pro explains that RBE is what these imaginary alien civilisations all use and Con decides to simply say it's a corrupt theory and that the founder is a shill. This is not what Con was supposed to do in this debate. Con's angle had to be either that the RBE is impossible to be a system and that civilisations are possible only without it (which would render the fact that the proponents for RBE preach it must be used in civilisations as liars OR that RBE is not the system that any one of the civilisation types use above type 0 which was negated in the debate as it's the uncivilised type. Con never does this, not one in my eyes. All Con does is say that RBE is not provably sustainable and that the founder is corrupt which doesn't mean that in the theory of type 1-4 civilisations the RBE isn't the system they rely on.
con won this hands down
e
e
e
e
As explained clearly already, no civilisation has, can or ever will be an RBE. It is a bullshit, Communist, anti-civilisation, anti-human, Trojan Horse scam of extremely evil people to exploit the vulnerable. Anyone who defends the RBE is either extremely evil or so ignorant and gullible that they are an imminent danger to everyone around them. There is no confusion over this, only toxic, psychopathic parasites trying to justify their dreams of world domination, make excuses for what they do and muddy the waters and hide as wolves among sheep. And you are one of them, self confessed in the provided forum thread. No tolerance. No excuses.
I could go into extensive further details about the RBE. But I don't need to. I have already completely destroyed my RBE opponents at every turn and they don't have a leg to stand on.
Remind me again, what rights do I have in your RBE? Does love and morality exist in your RBE? How exactly does the RBE gain control of all the world's resources and deal with those who resist? Who decides how to distribute the world's resources? What happens to people who reject the RBE? What evidence is there to support the RBE's claims about human behavior? Where is the history of the RBE debating educated people and winning? Will you dare to answer those questions?
look at the description of the debate from outside here:
https://www.debateart.com/debates
Look at the description, it says "In this context, a civilisation refers to a type one or higher on the Kardashev Scale, not the traditional definition. My position is that all civilisations are Resource Based Economies (as in technocratic socialism)"
No it wasn't. It's about whether Civilisations adopt the RBE. And they don't, past or present. None ever have in recorded history, since it's a new concept. And none ever can in the future. It is a self refuting paradox. This is why no-one has ever or will ever attempt it. The moment they attempt to install it, they die. It's as ridiculous as saying 'All civilisations have adopted the cyanide pill, because it promises you the powers of superman flight'. More importantly, this is a malignant and deceptive attempt at advertising the RBE and trolling for victims. I called it for what it is, and utterly refuted all claims made by my opponent to the point where he even admitted I was right (after calling me silly names like winkle picker). I won, and your single spiteful vote doesn't change that. Let viewers make up their own mind. They now have the information they need to take an informed position against the RBE, and avoid being scammed by it.
The debate wasn't if RBE is good or not but if the civilisations in the venus project all use RBE or not.
Funny how pro gets voted for the better argument. Yet he didn't make a single argument or provide a single shred of evidence to support his claim. He loses by default. To make it worse, his own 2 links refute him and prove what I say, as if the dozens of links and hundreds of videos therein don't make that clear enough. And he even confesses that after doing some research, he has confirmed evidence to what I say. I know more about the RBE than its founder and inner circle hierarchy. Votes don't win arguments. That's a fallacy called Ad Populum. I won this 'debate' in totality. Your RBE is a Trojan Horse that was never meant to work. Its purpose is to lead people astray with Communism/Marxism to disrupt and weaken Western civilisation, and syphon money from the ignorant. On the surface, the RBE is only appealing to the ignorant. Upon investigation, the RBE is only appealing to psychopaths who are so blinded by their obsession with power that they think they have a chance. The RBE is a parasitic ideological virus. Should that virus become an epidemic again, I will destroy it again. For now, it has no power or influence. Just a few minions who troll internet forums desperately looking for gullible prey to fund them. In the RBE, you have no rights or freedoms. Questioning the RBE costs you your life, for the 'sake of the system'. There is no evolution and no progress. And there is no coming back from it, it's a one way trip to oblivion. But it will never happen and you don't have a leg to stand on. I didn't completely destroy your cult when I could have. I left it alive to serve a temporary purpose.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ca6lYrutbkA
My mistake, I will fix this later via the admin.
I meant to give conduct to Con and arguments to Pro but I ended up clicking the button for Con that was arguments and not conduct which negated what I gave to Pro.
If that was his plan, explain to me exactly how you know that and show me the proof.
I'm not the one who follows a dead man's plan to become God.
Classifying your "proof" as religious proves that you are a meaningless troglodyte primitive.
Your motives are not what you think they are. Jacque Fresco was one of the most evil people in history.
If you want to know what Anonymous is, as opposed to fantasies and theories about the most mysterious organisation in history, then review the story in my thread about it in the religion section of the forum.
Calling people silly names isn't an argument. It's a confession of losing an argument.
The real anonymous is a loosely connected gaggle of hackers and activists with no central ideology or goals. It is not actually a group in the traditional sense, anyone can take up the mantle of anonymous, and there is a wide range of different types of anonymous members. Having no clear agenda or sense of direction, anonymous has accomplished little and will ultimately be inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. This man is either one of it's more delusional members or (more likely) a troll and a total loser.
Edit: Anonymous
Yeah, anonymously definitely won't do anything to defame you since you're not a public figure. Worst case scenario, they will fake your identity to get ahold of your bank account (personally experience: working as a bank teller).
My motives are to counteract the destructive path that humanity is taking. Instead of helping you would rather lie about one of the greatest people in history.
I am not here to hack you, threaten you or censor you. I am here to get the truth out and let people make up their own mind. The only reason you would ever need to fear me, is if your motives are wrong.
I actually believe he has real ties to Anonymous man, I wouldn't want to piss him off too much personally. I disagree with him but I also have my doubts about Jacques Fresco.
Oh bugger off you winkle picker. You don't know the first thing about RBE and you are just pulling 90% of what you say out of your dirty little hole. When you die do you want your entire legacy to be making shitty youtube videos where you claim you can see the future and that Jacque Fresco was a child murderer with dreams of world domination? I enjoy trolling as well, but I do not make it my life's work. You must be some kind of beorgiose clown who inherited enough money to be set for life, that is the only way you could afford to sit here defaming people and making shit up on the internet all day. You are a spoiled child at heart aren't you?
You are dealing with the man who took down your RBE cult. Deal with it. You chose to debate, own the consequences.
I guess you can challenge people, I suppose.
Maybe, but I don't think he should. It might create echo chambers. Something I would prefer however is if there was some form of objective process for determining the winner of a debate that doesn't involve opinions. A voting system is ineffective because you win by appealing to the majority rather than by being correct.
Maybe the dev can add restrictions on who can accept debates
Indeed.
Too bad someone real didn't get to it first.
An interesting debate
I've never heard his voice, if that's him it doesn't even prove anything. In fact, it indicates that he's not the true founder, because why would he make an appearance without hiding his identity? It's not very anonymous of him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMAh4JVn5_M
why does he have the exact same voice as the man in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMAh4JVn5_M&t=263s
This guy is not the founder of Anonymous, he is a man with high functioning troll disorder. He is a mega troll that apparently spends all his time trolling on debate sites and making fake anonymous videos on numerous obscure youtube channels. In reality he is probably similar to Bronto in regards to his views and is a very ignorant person parroting the opinions of various retards who know nothing about RBE. If you look at his "refutation" video of RBE it's clear he is a troll, because he literally gets every single thing wrong about how RBE works in deliberately stupid ways. I'll believe this guy is the founder of anonymous when pigs fly and you get laid.
I don't doubt that the founder of Anonymous is allied with trolls and knows the art of trolling in ways you and I are even not knowledgeable of. I wouldn't want to mess too hard with him though. If you think me and Bronto are dangerous you don't know real internet-threatening. Anonymous will literally ruin your life if you piss them off too much.
I am a person who hates both them and illuminati but I see Illuminati as the lesser evil as they actually do what they do for CONTROLLING the bad guys in humanity while Anonymous wants to never be controlled even if the bad guys are on their side.
Do you not see that this man is a troll?
You both hate Illuminati for the same reasons and use that as the reason you support and hate RBE. This is a hilarious debate to watch.
Yes, pro goes first. Thank you for accepting my debate.
I seem to need to wait for my opponents opening argument.
I accepted your debate. I don't see any way to respond. I can only respond in the comments here. This website doesn't appear to function. If necessary, I will make my case in the comments here. Anyone know how to respond in the debate itself?
Interesting, so you had similar ideas to Jacque before you even heard of him. Judging by your profile you are still young as well, so if what you say is true you are probably a relatively intelligent individual. Do you have any plans regarding the realisation of the system? (we can move this to pm if you prefer)
I suppose that by "Resource Based Economy," you are referring to the political-economic system described on this webpage: https://www.thevenusproject.com/resource-based-economy/
If so, then I am familiar with the concept in that I independently conceived it and have for some time now advocated it as the correct, and perhaps inevitable, system.
So you know of the RBE. How familiar are you with the concept?
For once, I agree with you.